|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: RaymondRaymond Date: May 6, 2008 04:33
On Mon, 5 May 2008 22:38:20 -0700 (PDT), RichAsianKid
hotmail.com> wrote:
>On May 5, 7:57 am, Raymond nizuy.com> wrote:>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 02:23:50 -0700 (PDT), pg catholic.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>On May 5, 1:26 am,RichAsianKid hotmail.com...
|
| Show full article (5.38Kb) |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: pgpg Date: May 6, 2008 04:44
On May 6, 4:33 am, Raymond nizuy.com> wrote:> On Mon, 5 May 2008 22:38:20 -0700 (PDT), RichAsianKid
>
>
>
> hotmail.com> wrote:>>On May 5, 7:57 am, Raymond nizuy.com> wrote:>>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 02:23:50 -0700 (PDT), pg catholic.org>
>>> wrote:>
>>>>On May 5, 1:26 am,RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:>>>>> On May 4, 11:10 pm, PaPaPeng yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>> This post, this article, is almost disingenuous knowing where
>>>>> PaPaPeng's loyalties lie, but let's get some facts straight, if
>>>>>RichAsianKidwould take the bait (perhaps that's the real intent of
>>>>> this post?) ever so masochistically (shut up!) and repost old old old
>>>>> very old counter-evidence (never mind if PaPaPeng cunningly plays
>>>>> hidden dragon or whatever):
> ...
|
| Show full article (5.64Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: RichAsianKidRichAsianKid Date: May 7, 2008 09:12
On May 6, 2:23 am, pg catholic.org> wrote:> On May 5, 10:34 pm,RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Make sure you read the above **in total**.
>
> Sorry I had to cut of a large part of your message, because if I
> don't, you might not even locate my answer admist a sea of words.
>
> Enuf of my explanation ... but when I read that link you provided
> (thanks!) in verbatim, I also read the comments, all 53 of them.
>
> www.haloscan.com/comments/raldanash/112746833861738814?url=http://www...
>
> One of the commentor "pconroy" actually quoted a guy named "William
> Pfaff", in regarding the same issue.
>
> Please allow me to quote it below ...
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RichAsianKidRichAsianKid Date: May 7, 2008 09:19
On May 6, 2:39 am, pg catholic.org> wrote:> On May 5, 10:34 pm,RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hehehe ... among the links from you, there's something I like you to
> re-read ---www.vdare.com/sailer/india.htm
>
> Scroll down to where it mention the "meritocratic elite" ... and let
> me quote from the article ...
>
> " The top Indian colleges are by now probably the most selective in
> the world. And because they teach in English, their graduates are more
> of a competitive threat to American journalists and their spouses and
> friends than are the Chinese, who are merely hammering blue collar
> Americans. And who cares about them?"
>
> .... and ....
>
> "At the elite end of the journalism racket, I have more than a few
> Indian readers who could step in and write this column for me (Peter,
> please forget I said that!). But fewer Chinese readers could do the ...
|
| Show full article (3.99Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RichAsianKidRichAsianKid Date: May 7, 2008 09:28
On May 6, 7:33 am, Raymond nizuy.com> wrote:> On Mon, 5 May 2008 22:38:20 -0700 (PDT),RichAsianKid
>
>
>
> hotmail.com> wrote:>>On May 5, 7:57 am, Raymond nizuy.com> wrote:>>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 02:23:50 -0700 (PDT), pg catholic.org>
>>> wrote:>
>>>>On May 5, 1:26 am,RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:>>>>> On May 4, 11:10 pm, PaPaPeng yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>> This post, this article, is almost disingenuous knowing where
>>>>> PaPaPeng's loyalties lie, but let's get some facts straight, if
>>>>>RichAsianKidwould take the bait (perhaps that's the real intent of
>>>>> this post?) ever so masochistically (shut up!) and repost old old old
>>>>> very old counter-evidence (never mind if PaPaPeng cunningly plays
>>>>> hidden dragon or whatever):
> ...
|
| Show full article (6.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RichAsianKidRichAsianKid Date: May 7, 2008 09:38
On May 6, 2:56 am, pg catholic.org> wrote:> On May 5, 10:34 pm,RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> And it it's not enough, read this ---http://anglosphere.com/weblog/archives/000313.html
>
> Specifically these ....
>
> "What struck me about the relative situations of the two countries as
> described here is that most of the things holding India back are
> fixable in the near future; most of the problems with China are deep-
> seated and will require luck and a probably difficult transition
> period to work themselves through. This suggests that India will
> continue to accelerate, more slowly for a while and then faster as the
> effects of reform accumulate. China may continue to go forward
> smoothly, or it may hit a wall in the not too distant future."
I've answered this above, in reference to the Sailer article
immediately above. Besides, even in things that matter in business,
things that China is well known to fall down flat by international
standards:
|
| Show full article (1.21Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RichAsianKidRichAsianKid Date: May 7, 2008 09:46
On May 5, 11:37 pm, pg catholic.org> wrote:> On May 5, 8:17 pm, Wakalukong yahoo.com.sg> wrote:
>
>
>>> On May 5, 4:26 pm,RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:>
>>> On May 4, 11:10 pm, PaPaPeng yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>> It will be nice if India can catch up with China. We don't know the
>>>> full consequences but it is probably good. The key phrase is 'India
>>>> is on the cusp of something big' which is the position Indian had been
>>>> stuck at for the past 60 years.
>
>>>> Tiger economies are snapping at US heelsBut it's not clear whether
>>>> Beijing or New Delhi will catch up first
>
>>>> Richard Wachman
>>>> The Observer,
> ...
|
| Show full article (5.70Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RaymondRaymond Date: May 7, 2008 10:37
On Wed, 7 May 2008 09:28:25 -0700 (PDT), RichAsianKid
hotmail.com> wrote:
>On May 6, 7:33 am, Raymond nizuy.com> wrote:>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 22:38:20 -0700 (PDT),RichAsianKid
>>
>>
>>
>> hotmail.com> wrote:>>>On May 5, 7:57 am, Raymond nizuy.com...
|
| Show full article (6.83Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: pgpg Date: May 7, 2008 18:48
On May 7, 9:12 am, RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:> On May 6, 2:23 am, pg catholic.org> wrote:
>
>
>>> On May 5, 10:34 pm,RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:>
>
>>> Make sure you read the above **in total**.
>
>> Sorry I had to cut of a large part of your message, because if I
>> don't, you might not even locate my answer admist a sea of words.
>
>> Enuf of my explanation ... but when I read that link you provided
>> (thanks!) in verbatim, I also read the comments, all 53 of them.
>
>
>> One of the commentor "pconroy" actually quoted a guy named "William ...
|
| Show full article (4.69Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: pgpg Date: May 7, 2008 19:25
On May 7, 9:12 am, RichAsianKid hotmail.com> wrote:
Let's use common sense when we compare the chinks with the dots, okay?
Chinks are fakers and copiers. Chinks can not think out of the box. In
fact, Chinks prefer to box themselves in (look at chinatown all over
the world and you know what I mean)
Chinks can not innovate. Chinks have all the 5,000 years of burden to
carry, that "Confucius" burden alone has destroyed millions of Chinks'
outlook in life.
Dots, on the other hand, prefer to see beyond the horizon. Yes, you
can say that they are dreamers, but the Dots are more than MERE
DREAMING, they are working towards their dream.
Dots prefer to think OUT of the box. They innovate, they focus on
inventing things for the future.
While the Dots have also a long, long history, they refused to be
burdened by it. True, the Dots have a caste system. While others may
see it as a hindrance, I see it as a boost.
A caste system effectively preventing those low IQ people from getting
more than their fair share of what a society can give them.
|
| Show full article (6.86Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
