> Actually, experts in implosion demolition don't think the WTC 1&2
> collapses look anything like an implosion demolition. See
>
http://www.implosionworld.com/news.htm for a link to a pdf file
> discussing the subject. In any event, for such a grandiose scheme as
> implosion of the WTC towers to be taken seriously, you first have to ask
> the question WHY? WHY use implosion in addition to flying the airplanes
> into the towers? So far, I never seen a logical rationale for doing so and
> there are strong arguments for NOT doing so e.g. the risk of exposure with
> dozens of demolition workers having unfettered access to the WTC towers
> for probably weeks if not months prior to the attack. Have you any idea of
> how long it would take to prepare for explosive demolition of the twin
> towers? How many man-days of highly unusual activity to rig the columns
> with explosive charges? All it would take is one person not in on the plot
> to bring it all into the open.
>
