|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: Seon FergusonSeon Ferguson Date: Sep 4, 2007 10:19
> For all those who support the 911 Bomb theories:
>
> What is the strongest piece of evidence you believe you have that the
> WTC was destroyed using bombs or other forms of controlled destructive
> devices preplanted in the buildings? Provide it here and I'll see how
> it holds up.
>
I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do look
like a case of a building implosion.
Hopefully you can give me the logical explination I have been looking for
for a while.
|
| |
|
| | 153 Comments |
|
|
Author: BDKBDK Date: Sep 4, 2007 11:56
>> For all those who support the 911 Bomb theories:
>>
>> What is the strongest piece of evidence you believe you have that the
>> WTC was destroyed using bombs or other forms of controlled destructive
>> devices preplanted in the buildings? Provide it here and I'll see how
>> it holds up.
>>
> I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do look
> like a case of a building implosion.
No they dont! They don't look anything like them!!
BDK
|
| Show full article (0.80Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Seon FergusonSeon Ferguson Date: Sep 4, 2007 12:04
>>> For all those who support the 911 Bomb theories:
>>>
>>> What is the strongest piece of evidence you believe you have that the
>>> WTC was destroyed using bombs or other forms of controlled destructive
>>> devices preplanted in the buildings? Provide it here and I'll see how
>>> it holds up.
>>>
>> I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do
>> look
>> like a case of a building implosion.
>
> No they dont! They don't look anything like them!!
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Bryan OlsonBryan Olson Date: Sep 4, 2007 12:25
Seon Ferguson wrote:
> I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do look
> like a case of a building implosion.
> Hopefully you can give me the logical explination I have been looking for
> for a while.
Sure. People see unique events and try to relate them to what
they've seen before. No one had ever seen anything like the
deliberate plane crashes and consequent collapses of 9/11,
but we still try to relate thise to something, and building
implosion, while vastly different, is closer than anything
else in our experience. In the case of WTC 1 and 2, no one
can find a building implosion that looked anything like
that, but what else do we have with which to compare?
The truth is that no one knew what to expect. Unique events
have unexpected consequences. That's how the world works.
--
--Bryan
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Seon FergusonSeon Ferguson Date: Sep 4, 2007 13:18
> Seon Ferguson wrote:
>> I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do
>> look like a case of a building implosion.
>> Hopefully you can give me the logical explination I have been looking for
>> for a while.
>
> Sure. People see unique events and try to relate them to what
> they've seen before. No one had ever seen anything like the
> deliberate plane crashes and consequent collapses of 9/11,
> but we still try to relate thise to something, and building
> implosion, while vastly different, is closer than anything
> else in our experience. In the case of WTC 1 and 2, no one
> can find a building implosion that looked anything like
> that, but what else do we have with which to compare?
>
> The truth is that no one knew what to expect. Unique events
> have unexpected consequences. That's how the world works.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: John P.John P. Date: Sep 4, 2007 17:04
"Seon Ferguson" gmail.com> wrote in a message
> I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do
> look like a case of a building implosion.
> Hopefully you can give me the logical explination I have been looking for
> for a while.
You've seen top down collapses like the towers?
|
| |
| 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: iwsiws Date: Sep 4, 2007 18:20
>> For all those who support the 911 Bomb theories:
>>
>> What is the strongest piece of evidence you believe you have that the
>> WTC was destroyed using bombs or other forms of controlled destructive
>> devices preplanted in the buildings? Provide it here and I'll see how
>> it holds up.
>>
> I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do
> look like a case of a building implosion.
> Hopefully you can give me the logical explination I have been looking for
> for a while.
Actually, experts in implosion demolition don't think the WTC 1&2 collapses
look anything like an implosion demolition. See
http://www.implosionworld.com/news.htm for a link to a pdf file discussing
the subject. In any event, for such a grandiose scheme as implosion of the ...
|
| Show full article (1.70Kb) |
| 7 Comments |
|
|
Author: BDKBDK Date: Sep 4, 2007 18:48
>>>> For all those who support the 911 Bomb theories:
>>>>
>>>> What is the strongest piece of evidence you believe you have that the
>>>> WTC was destroyed using bombs or other forms of controlled destructive
>>>> devices preplanted in the buildings? Provide it here and I'll see how
>>>> it holds up.
>>>>
>>> I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do
>>> look
>>> like a case of a building implosion. ...
|
| Show full article (1.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BDKBDK Date: Sep 4, 2007 18:50
> "Seon Ferguson" gmail.com> wrote in a message
> >> I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do
>> look like a case of a building implosion.
>> Hopefully you can give me the logical explination I have been looking for
>> for a while.
>
> You've seen top down collapses like the towers?
>
>
>
That's just one of his problems.
BDK
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Everybody KnowsEverybody Knows Date: Sep 4, 2007 19:14
"iws" nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4BfDi.24966$Zk5.17396@newsfe23.lga...>>> For all those who support the 911 Bomb theories:
>>>
>>> What is the strongest piece of evidence you believe you have that the
>>> WTC was destroyed using bombs or other forms of controlled destructive
>>> devices preplanted in the buildings? Provide it here and I'll see how
>>> it holds up.
>>>
>> I dont hold to that theory however the colapse of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 do
>> look like a case of a building implosion.
>> Hopefully you can give me the logical explination I have been looking for
>> for a while.
> Actually, experts in implosion demolition don't think the WTC 1&2
> collapses look anything like an implosion demolition. See ...
|
| Show full article (1.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
