Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.physics only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

sci.physics Profile…
 Up
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: Henry
Date: Aug 9, 2007 01:32

John P. wrote:
> Chuckles... perhaps you could start

I've been started. Do try to keep up. Can you answer the question,
kooker - or not?

hating kooks and liars hide the truth>

Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
physical properties as steel on your planet?

http://0304.netclime.net/1_5/000/000/360/353/11764162552377148.jpg

http://www.stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html

--

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
http://www.911truth.org
Show full article (2.54Kb)
5928 Comments
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: John P.
Date: Aug 10, 2007 02:35

"Henry" treason.gov> wrote in a message
>> Chuckles... perhaps you could start
> I've been started.

... and you've been on a major retard binge ever since. It was like you just
said one stupid thing once, then it became a habit, and now you find
yourself unable to stop or control yourself. You are on an endless quest to
achieve greater levels of stupidity to satisfy your cravings.
> > hating kooks and liars hide the truth>

The truth is, you are pretending I hold some opinion that mirrors one of
your own in cluless stupidity. The truth, that cannot be hidden, is the
thought is your own invention.
> Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
> reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
> left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
> of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
> physical properties as steel on your planet?
Show full article (1.31Kb)
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: Henry
Date: Aug 11, 2007 04:55

Al Dykes wrote:
> In article <46BA5298.DDF3C8E1@treason.gov>,
> Henry treason.gov> wrote:
>> John P. wrote:
>>
>>> Chuckles... perhaps you could start
>> I've been started. Do try to keep up. Can you answer the question,
>> kooker - or not?
>>
>> >> hating kooks and liars hide the truth>
>>
>> Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
>> reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
>> left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
>> of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
>> physical properties as steel on your planet?
>>
>> http://0304.netclime.net/1_5/000/000/360/353/11764162552377148.jpg
>> ...
Show full article (3.50Kb)
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: Henry
Date: Aug 15, 2007 02:22

John P. wrote:
> "Henry" treason.gov> wrote in a message
>> Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
>> reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
>> left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
>> of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
>> physical properties as steel on your planet?
> Well, here on earth Chuckles, physics would explain such an event.

Your "physics" can "explain" that air has about the same
physical properties as steel? Give it a try, kooker. Should
be good for a laugh.

--
Show full article (2.70Kb)
128 Comments
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: Al Dykes
Date: Aug 15, 2007 03:00

In article <46C24749.AD57DEC0@treason.gov>,
Henry treason.gov> wrote:
>John P. wrote:
>> "Henry" treason.gov> wrote in a message
>
>>> Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
>>> reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
>>> left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
>>> of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
>>> physical properties as steel on your planet?
>> Well, here on earth Chuckles, physics would explain such an event.
> ...
Show full article (1.13Kb)
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: John P.
Date: Aug 15, 2007 03:39

"Henry" treason.gov> wrote in a message
>>> Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
>>> reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
>>> left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
>>> of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
>>> physical properties as steel on your planet?
>

...you think repeating your stupidity will somehow cause it to make sense.
>> Well, here on earth Chuckles, physics would explain such an event.
> Your "physics" can "explain" that air has about the same
> physical properties as steel?

No Chuckles... maybe on your planet, but not this one. Do you come up with
these completely idiotic ideas on your own, or do you need to ingest large
amounts of drugs first?
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: harry k
Date: Aug 15, 2007 04:31

On Aug 14, 6:00 pm, ady...@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
> In article <46C24749.AD57D...@treason.gov>,
>
>
>
>
>
> Henry treason.gov> wrote:
>>John P. wrote:
>>> "Henry" treason.gov> wrote in a message
>
>>>> Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
>>>> reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
>>>> left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
>>>> of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
>>>> physical properties as steel on your planet?
>
>> >>hating extremists and/or terrorists hide the truth>
> ...
Show full article (1.33Kb)
no comments
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: Henry
Date: Aug 17, 2007 02:49

Al Dykes wrote:
> In article <46C24749.AD57DEC0@treason.gov>,
> Henry treason.gov> wrote:
>> John P. wrote:
>>> "Henry" treason.gov> wrote in a message
>>>> Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
>>>> reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
>>>> left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
>>>> of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
>>>> physical properties as steel on your planet?
>>> Well, here on earth Chuckles, physics would explain such an event.
>> Your "physics" can "explain" that air has about the same
>> physical properties as steel? Give it a try, kooker. Should ...
Show full article (3.23Kb)
11 Comments
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: Henry
Date: Aug 17, 2007 02:55

John P. wrote:
> "Henry" treason.gov> wrote in a message
>> Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
>> reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
>> left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
>> of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
>> physical properties as steel on your planet?
> Well, here on earth Chuckles, physics would explain such an event.
Show full article (2.65Kb)
3 Comments
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition         


Author: animal05
Date: Aug 17, 2007 02:53

Henry wrote:
> Al Dykes wrote:
>
>>In article <46C24749.AD57DEC0@treason.gov>,
>>Henry treason.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>John P. wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Henry" treason.gov> wrote in a message
>>>>
>>>>> Tell us again why you "think" the block in the right should
>>>>>reach the ground at about the same time as the block on the
>>>>>left which has to fall directly through a hundred thousand tons
>>>>>of undamaged reinforced steel columns. Does air have the same
>>>>>physical properties as steel on your planet?
>>>
>>> >>>hating extremists and/or terrorists hide the truth>
>>>
>>> http://0304.netclime.net/1_5/000/000/360/353/11764162552377148.jpg ...
Show full article (1.56Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9