|
|
Up |
|
  |
Author: Robert ClarkRobert Clark Date: Jul 5, 2008 15:42
The distance from Earth to Mars is about 60,000,000 km at closest
approach. If we have a 30 km/sec initial velocity to Mars, which might
be achievable with airbreathing(scramjet) or nuclear propulsion then
the travel time might be 23 days if you make a simplifying assumption
of a straight-line trip. However, the time required to make the
journey might be made significantly better than this 23 days.
The key fact is that the Earth itself has a 30 km/s velocity around
the Sun that can be used to give us an extra velocity boost toward the
orbit of Mars. In this new estimate I'll simplify the analysis by
assuming that at this high velocity and at the short travel time
achieved, the path will be essentially straight, rather than the
actual ellipse.
The famous Hohmann transfer orbit gives a minimal delta-v and energy
solution for traveling from one orbit to another but this is known for
its long travel times, 6 to 7 months for a Earth to Mars trip. We want
to shorten that for a manned trip to reduce the exposure to radiation
and to reduce the effects of long periods in zero-g.
I'll take the Earth orbit radius to be 150 million km and the Mars
orbit radius to be a little more than its distance at perihelion 210
million km. If we went in a tangential direction to Earth's orbit we ...
|
| Show full article (3.28Kb) |
|
| | 571 Comments |
|
  |
Author: AndroclesAndrocles Date: Jul 5, 2008 17:09
"Robert Clark" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8cf7edc9-74e4-40a2-a19d-836b6f694bc7@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
The distance from Earth to Mars is about 60,000,000 km at closest
approach. If we have a 30 km/sec initial velocity to Mars, which might
be achievable with airbreathing(scramjet) or nuclear propulsion then
the travel time might be 23 days if you make a simplifying assumption
of a straight-line trip. However, the time required to make the
journey might be made significantly better than this 23 days.
The key fact is that the Earth itself has a 30 km/s velocity around
the Sun that can be used to give us an extra velocity boost toward the
orbit of Mars. In this new estimate I'll simplify the analysis by
assuming that at this high velocity and at the short travel time
achieved, the path will be essentially straight, rather than the
actual ellipse.
The famous Hohmann transfer orbit gives a minimal delta-v and energy
solution for traveling from one orbit to another but this is known for
its long travel times, 6 to 7 months for a Earth to Mars trip. We want
to shorten that for a manned trip to reduce the exposure to radiation
and to reduce the effects of long periods in zero-g.
I'll take the Earth orbit radius to be 150 million km and the Mars ...
|
| Show full article (1.88Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: SpacemanSpaceman Date: Jul 5, 2008 17:30
Robert Clark wrote:
> The distance from Earth to Mars is about 60,000,000 km at closest
> approach. If we have a 30 km/sec initial velocity to Mars, which might
> be achievable with airbreathing(scramjet) or nuclear propulsion then
> the travel time might be 23 days if you make a simplifying assumption
> of a straight-line trip. However, the time required to make the
> journey might be made significantly better than this 23 days.
> The key fact is that the Earth itself has a 30 km/s velocity around
> the Sun that can be used to give us an extra velocity boost toward the
> orbit of Mars. In this new estimate I'll simplify the analysis by
> assuming that at this high velocity and at the short travel time
> achieved, the path will be essentially straight, rather than the
> actual ellipse.
> The famous Hohmann transfer orbit gives a minimal delta-v and energy
> solution for traveling from one orbit to another but this is known for
> its long travel times, 6 to 7 months for a Earth to Mars trip. We want
> to shorten that for a manned trip to reduce the exposure to radiation
> and to reduce the effects of long periods in zero-g.
> I'll take the Earth orbit radius to be 150 million km and the Mars
> orbit radius to be a little more than its distance at perihelion 210 ...
|
| Show full article (1.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Robert ClarkRobert Clark Date: Jul 5, 2008 17:47
On Jul 5, 11:09 am, "Androcles" wrote:
...
> Incredibly naive...
> Look at a shuttle and the size of the fuel tank needed to lift that
> to Earth orbit so that it travels at 27,755 km per HOUR to match
> speed with the ISS.
> http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/realdata/tracking/
> Now you want to travel at more than 3,600 times that, 27,755 km
> per SECOND.
>
> That means you have to lift into Earth orbit a rocket so huge it just
> doesn't bear thinking about and THEN fire THAT up to travel to Mars.
> But that's only half the story, you have to carry as much fuel mass at
> the other end to stop it again.
> Aero braking?
> Columbia broke up using aero braking, and your ship is going
> 3,600 times faster than that.
> And for the return trip...
>
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.20Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Sam WormleySam Wormley Date: Jul 5, 2008 18:00
Robert Clark wrote:
> The distance from Earth to Mars is about 60,000,000 km at closest
> approach. If we have a 30 km/sec initial velocity to Mars, which might
> be achievable with airbreathing(scramjet) or nuclear propulsion then
> the travel time might be 23 days if you make a simplifying assumption
> of a straight-line trip.
How are you going to to slow that craft down at Mars, short of vaporization
when plowing into the surface?
What is the cost of fuel/unit of mass of the craft comparing traditional
transfer orbits and your 23 "strait shot"?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Robert ClarkRobert Clark Date: Jul 5, 2008 18:02
On Jul 5, 11:30 am, "Spaceman"
wrote:
> Robert Clark wrote:
>> The distance from Earth to Mars is about 60,000,000 km at closest
>> approach. If we have a 30 km/sec initial velocity to Mars, which might
>> be achievable with airbreathing(scramjet) or nuclear propulsion then
>> the travel time might be 23 days if you make a simplifying assumption
>> of a straight-line trip. However, the time required to make the
>> journey might be made significantly better than this 23 days.
>> The key fact is that the Earth itself has a 30 km/s velocity around
>> the Sun that can be used to give us an extra velocity boost toward the
>> orbit of Mars. In this new estimate I'll simplify the analysis by
>> assuming that at this high velocity and at the short travel time
>> achieved, the path will be essentially straight, rather than the
>> actual ellipse.
>> The famous Hohmann transfer orbit gives a minimal delta-v and energy
>> solution for traveling from one orbit to another but this is known for
>> its long travel times, 6 to 7 months for a Earth to Mars trip. We want
>> to shorten that for a manned trip to reduce the exposure to radiation
>> and to reduce the effects of long periods in zero-g. ...
|
| Show full article (4.67Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Sam WormleySam Wormley Date: Jul 5, 2008 18:06
Robert Clark wrote:
> My guess is that at 15 km/sec this is so close to the escape velocity
> of 11 km/sec that the curved elliptical path would become dominant and
> the trip time would be only a little better than the curved Hohmann
> transfer orbit time of 6 to 7 months.
>
>
> Bob Clark
Guess? Do the calculations!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: SpacemanSpaceman Date: Jul 5, 2008 18:21
Robert Clark wrote:
> On Jul 5, 11:30 am, "Spaceman"
> wrote:
>> Robert Clark wrote:
>>> The distance from Earth to Mars is about 60,000,000 km at closest
>>> approach. If we have a 30 km/sec initial velocity to Mars, which
>>> might be achievable with airbreathing(scramjet) or nuclear
>>> propulsion then the travel time might be 23 days if you make a
>>> simplifying assumption of a straight-line trip. However, the time
>>> required to make the journey might be made significantly better
>>> than this 23 days. The key fact is that the Earth itself has a 30
>>> km/s velocity around the Sun that can be used to give us an extra
>>> velocity boost toward the orbit of Mars. In this new estimate I'll
>>> simplify the analysis by assuming that at this high velocity and at
>>> the short travel time achieved, the path will be essentially
>>> straight, rather than the actual ellipse.
>>> The famous Hohmann transfer orbit gives a minimal delta-v and
>>> energy solution for traveling from one orbit to another but this is
>>> known for its long travel times, 6 to 7 months for a Earth to Mars
>>> trip. We want to shorten that for a manned trip to reduce the ...
|
| Show full article (1.98Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Willie.MookieWillie.Mookie Date: Jul 5, 2008 18:22
Neither of you got it quite right - or said it quite clearly enough..
To get an idea of what's going on you need an elementary knowledge of
the rocket equation - how rockets build speed - and an elementary
knowledge of orbital mechanics. The speed and transit times for
minimum energy orbits are calculated - and once that is understood, we
can then proceed to see what the benefits and costs of adding speed
are;
ROCKET EQUATION
The velocity of a rocket propelled projectile is given by the
Tsiolkovsky Equation;
Vf = Ve*LN(1/(1-u))
Where
Vf = final velocity
Ve= exhaust velocity
LN( ..) = natural logarithm function
u = propellant fraction.
So, if a rocket is 50%% by weight propellant and its exhaust speed is 4
km/sec we can compute a final velocity for the rocket of;
|
| Show full article (7.41Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Robert ClarkRobert Clark Date: Jul 5, 2008 18:27
On Jul 5, 12:06 pm, Sam Wormley mchsi.com> wrote:
> Robert Clark wrote:
>> My guess is that at 15 km/sec this is so close to the escape velocity
>> of 11 km/sec that the curved elliptical path would become dominant and
>> the trip time would be only a little better than the curved Hohmann
>> transfer orbit time of 6 to 7 months.
>
>> Bob Clark
>
> Guess? Do the calculations!
It's a two body problem in *two* dimensions, not one. Doable, but not
trivial.
The closest I've seen to it on the net is this presentation:
Basic of Space Flight: Orbital Mechanics:Orbit Altitude Changes.
http://www.braeunig.us/space/orbmech.htm#maneuver
But this takes the angle of departure as only tangential to the
initial orbit so you don't find the optimal angle to minimize the trip
time.
Bob Clark
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|