Re: POTUS OBAMA & BP HEAD IMPERVIOUS TO WHAT 'S IN STORE WITH THE NEXT HURRICANES IN THE GULF OF MEXICO ... are those people crazy not to choke that well right now for good ?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.physics only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: POTUS OBAMA & BP HEAD IMPERVIOUS TO WHAT 'S IN STORE WITH THE NEXT HURRICANES IN THE GULF OF MEXICO ... are those people crazy not to choke that well right now for good ?         

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile
Author: spudnik
Date: Jun 8, 2010 00:26

oil is biomass; a hurricane'd spread the stuff,
so thinly as to constitute a very mild, organic fertilizer,
which might be the best possible outcome --
a nice, mild hurricane.

thusNso:
Building and Using Maui's Tanawa
These photos show the assembly of a primitive wooden torquetum
(a model of Maui's tanawa), in preparation for celestial
observations. ...
www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/fall01/Tanawa/tanawa.html

thusNso:
AP is his own Universe (as in, the Solopsist school,
the original "many universes" school of Bishop Everrit)
of pidgen circumlocution about all topics, BUT
I do agree that an actual doppler interferonetry would
not be needed for radar-ranging objects at close range,
and even that "doppler radar imaging" of storms may
not actually use the principle, or only *translate* it
into a graphical representation that evokes doppler-
gangers.

the rest of his ****, seems to be scatology, or
jsut English as a One-and-a-half language ... I mean,
English as a second of two halves of two langauges,
as he was adopted from immigrant parents,
per his CV.

thusNso:
the poor man is insisting upon the base of ten, and
that is guaranteed to be a barren approach, by all
of the work of Fermatttt (Fermat's Little Theorem e.g.; of course,
the theorem applies in any base, but ... y'know?).

also, the simple idea of assuming that a^n etc. are rational,
thence seeking a contradiction,
is very well-illustrated in the literature; however,
that is in English and other languages,
that AP does not appear to know past Kindergarten.
> Please post your proof, at last!

thusNso:
maybe AP has a good thought, that speed-trap radars have
no need of using such a doppler shift, assuming that
it does exist, because mere timing of the radar's return,
over some part of a second, is adequate to do the math. and,
one always hears of "dppler radar" by weather satellites,
whether or not that *inerferometry* is actully required, and
the radar-ranging can stil be interpreted in terms
of doppler shifts (in the colors of the Weather Channel graphics
e.g.).

now, why AP does not "beleive" in doppler shifts, apart
from the belief in the so-called Hubble *interpretation*
of the prevailing redshift-woith-distance effect,
seen in the starfield ... you'd have to read his ****,
more carefully; and that, ladies & germs, is scatology.

--Stop BP's and Waxman's capNtrade arbitrage rip-off!
http://wlym.com
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!