|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BrutusBrutus Date: Jul 26, 2007 04:32
Hi,
Are there actual experiments that have proven this aspect of
Special Relativity or is it just a hypothesis without any
experimental support? I know time can dilate, length can
contract but it won't mean anything if the Relativity of
Simultaneity is not yet actually seen. In case they are
seen. Pls. mention all subatomic, atomic, cosmic examples
where these have occured.
Thanks!
Brutus
|
| |
|
| | 211 Comments |
|
|
Author: JeckylJeckyl Date: Jul 26, 2007 04:50
> Hi,
>
> Are there actual experiments that have proven this aspect of
> Special Relativity or is it just a hypothesis without any
> experimental support? I know time can dilate, length can
> contract but it won't mean anything if the Relativity of
> Simultaneity is not yet actually seen. In case they are
> seen. Pls. mention all subatomic, atomic, cosmic examples
> where these have occured.
>
> Thanks!
AFAIK, because the things we can get up to velocities where we can observe
time dilation are generally point particles, we cannot observe simultaneity
and length contraction effects.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BrutusBrutus Date: Jul 26, 2007 05:14
On Jul 26, 7:50 pm, "Jeckyl" nowhere.com> wrote:>> Hi,
>
>> Are there actual experiments that have proven this aspect of
>> Special Relativity or is it just a hypothesis without any
>> experimental support? I know time can dilate, length can
>> contract but it won't mean anything if the Relativity of
>> Simultaneity is not yet actually seen. In case they are
>> seen. Pls. mention all subatomic, atomic, cosmic examples
>> where these have occured.
>
>> Thanks!
>
> AFAIK, because the things we can get up to velocities where we can observe
> time dilation are generally point particles, we cannot observe simultaneity
> and length contraction effects. ...
|
| Show full article (1.51Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JeckylJeckyl Date: Jul 26, 2007 06:15
> On Jul 26, 7:50 pm, "Jeckyl" nowhere.com> wrote:>>> Hi,
>>
>>> Are there actual experiments that have proven this aspect of
>>> Special Relativity or is it just a hypothesis without any
>>> experimental support? I know time can dilate, length can
>>> contract but it won't mean anything if the Relativity of
>>> Simultaneity is not yet actually seen. In case they are
>>> seen. Pls. mention all subatomic, atomic, cosmic examples
>>> where these have occured.
>>
>>> Thanks!
>>
>> AFAIK, because the things we can get up to velocities where we can ...
|
| Show full article (2.21Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ShubeeShubee Date: Jul 26, 2007 06:53
On Jul 26, 4:32 am, Brutus yahoo.com> wrote:> Hi,
>
> Are there actual experiments that have proven this aspect of
> Special Relativity or is it just a hypothesis without any
> experimental support? I know time can dilate, length can
> contract but it won't mean anything if the Relativity of
> Simultaneity is not yet actually seen. In case they are
> seen. Pls. mention all subatomic, atomic, cosmic examples
> where these have occured.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Brutus
|
| Show full article (1.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ShubeeShubee Date: Jul 26, 2007 06:53
On Jul 26, 4:32 am, Brutus yahoo.com> wrote:> Hi,
>
> Are there actual experiments that have proven this aspect of
> Special Relativity or is it just a hypothesis without any
> experimental support? I know time can dilate, length can
> contract but it won't mean anything if the Relativity of
> Simultaneity is not yet actually seen. In case they are
> seen. Pls. mention all subatomic, atomic, cosmic examples
> where these have occured.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Brutus
|
| Show full article (1.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BrutusBrutus Date: Jul 26, 2007 06:59
On Jul 26, 9:15 pm, "Jeckyl" nowhere.com> wrote:>> On Jul 26, 7:50 pm, "Jeckyl" nowhere.com> wrote:>>> "Brutus" yahoo.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>> Hi,
>
>>>> Are there actual experiments that have proven this aspect of
>>>> Special Relativity or is it just a hypothesis without any
>>>> experimental support? I know time can dilate, length can
>>>> contract but it won't mean anything if the Relativity of ...
|
| Show full article (3.20Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JeckylJeckyl Date: Jul 26, 2007 07:00
> On Jul 26, 4:32 am, Brutus yahoo.com> wrote:>> Hi,
>>
>> Are there actual experiments that have proven this aspect of
>> Special Relativity or is it just a hypothesis without any
>> experimental support? I know time can dilate, length can
>> contract but it won't mean anything if the Relativity of
>> Simultaneity is not yet actually seen. In case they are
>> seen. Pls. mention all subatomic, atomic, cosmic examples
>> where these have occured.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Brutus
>
> Brutus, the relativity of simultaneity is essentially a definition.
Its more than that.
|
| Show full article (1.11Kb) |
| 24 Comments |
|
|
Author: JeckylJeckyl Date: Jul 26, 2007 07:02
> On Jul 26, 9:15 pm, "Jeckyl" nowhere.com> wrote:
> Do you know the rough value of c
c is an exactly value
> wherein relativity of
> simultaneity can have effect or differences in the simultaneity
> that will take a second?
Its not just speed but distance that affect the simultaneity.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: BrutusBrutus Date: Jul 26, 2007 07:21
On Jul 26, 10:02 pm, "Jeckyl" nowhere.com> wrote:>> On Jul 26, 9:15 pm, "Jeckyl" nowhere.com> wrote:
>> Do you know the rough value of c>
> c is an exactly value
I mean what approx speed of objects before the effects become
dramatic.
>
>> wherein relativity of
>> simultaneity can have effect or differences in the simultaneity
>> that will take a second?
>
> Its not just speed but distance that affect the simultaneity.
|
| Show full article (0.81Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
