Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.physics only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing         

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile
Author: Pentcho Valev
Date: Aug 2, 2008 11:09

On Aug 2, 2:39 am, Traveler nowhere.net> wrote in
sci.physics:
> Gravitational Wave Theory Takes Another Kick in the Teeth: http://www.astroengine.com/?p=565
>
> The conclusion is obvious to anybody who does not kiss ass for a
> living. Gravity does not propagate at the speed of light as Einstein
> and his followers predict. Gravity is a universal,
> quasi-instantaneous, non-local, energy conservation phenomenon. No
> gravitational waves simply means that the general theory of relativity
> is falsified. ahahaha...
>
> Louis Savain
>
> Rebel Science News: http://rebelscience.blogspot.com/

Einsteiniana wastes so much money that sometimes even the bosses get
embarrassed:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2004/04/28/ecfgravb28...
"Did Einstein get all his sums right?.....Last week, an American probe
began an 18-month mission to put Einstein's prediction to the test, 90
years after he unveiled his ideas in Berlin. Gravity Probe B was
blasted into space from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on
a Boeing Delta 2 rocket and will orbit the Earth for more than a year.
The $700 million joint mission between Nasa and Stanford University,
conceived in 1958, uses four of the most perfect spheres ever created
inside the world's largest Thermos flask to detect minute distortions
in the fabric of the universe.....Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer
Royal, said: "The project's a technical triumph, and a triumph of the
persistence and lobbying power of Stanford University. But its
gestation has been grotesquely prolonged, and the cost overruns have
been equally gross. I recall hearing a talk about the project from
Francis Everitt (principal investigator) when I was still a student -
and it was already well advanced. "Back in the 1960s the evidence for
Einstein's theory was meagre - just two tests, with 10 per cent
precision. But relativity is now confirmed by several tests, with
precision of one part in 10,000. It's still, in principle, good to
have new and different tests. But the level of confidence in
Einstein's theory is now so high that an announcement of the expected
result will 'fork no lightening'. "Moreover, if there's an unexpected
result, I suspect most people will suspect an error in this very
challenging experiment rather than immediately abandon Einstein:
There's now so much evidence corroborating Einstein, that a high
burden of proof is required before he'll be usurped by any rival
theory. "So the most exciting - if un-alluring - outcome of Gravity
Probe B would be a request by Stanford University for another huge sum
of money to repeat it."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!