|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: Koobee WubleeKoobee Wublee Date: Aug 4, 2008 07:32
On Aug 2, 3:50 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Aug 1, 4:39 pm, Traveler wrote:
>
>> The conclusion is obvious to anybody who does not kiss ass for a
>> living. Gravity does not propagate at the speed of light as Einstein
>> and his followers predict. Gravity is a universal,
>> quasi-instantaneous, non-local, energy conservation phenomenon. No
>> gravitational waves simply means that the general theory of relativity
>> is falsified. ahahaha...
>
> Explain why binary systems decay as if gravitational radiation is real.
|
| Show full article (1.32Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Eric GisseEric Gisse Date: Aug 4, 2008 07:49
On Aug 3, 9:32 pm, Koobee Wublee gmail.com> wrote:> On Aug 2, 3:50 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>> On Aug 1, 4:39 pm, Traveler wrote:
>
>>> The conclusion is obvious to anybody who does not kiss ass for a
>>> living. Gravity does not propagate at the speed of light as Einstein
>>> and his followers predict. Gravity is a universal,
>>> quasi-instantaneous, non-local, energy conservation phenomenon. No
>>> gravitational waves simply means that the general theory of relativity
>>> is falsified. ahahaha...
>
>> Explain why binary systems decay as if gravitational radiation is real.
>
> If you have actually learnt the mathematics dealing with the orbital
> increase, you will understand the approach to the conservation of
> energy with non-conservation of angular momentum is also a plausible
> explanation to the orbital increase of a binary system over time. ...
|
| Show full article (1.05Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Koobee WubleeKoobee Wublee Date: Aug 4, 2008 08:27
On Aug 3, 10:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Aug 3, 9:32 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>> If you have actually learnt the mathematics dealing with the orbital
>> increase, you will understand the approach to the conservation of
>> energy with non-conservation of angular momentum is also a plausible
>> explanation to the orbital increase of a binary system over time.
>
> The stars are getting closer, not further apart.
The eccentricity is increasing. The orbital speed is increasing as
well.
Intuition explains increasing eccentricity as decreasing orbital speed
but not the mathematics involved. The closest approach is getting
closer while the farthest distance is getting further away. The
outcome of merging or flying apart is 50-50 not 100%% merging as
predicted by GR interpreted to manifest in radiation of gravitational
energy.
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
| 8 Comments |
|
|
Author: Eric GisseEric Gisse Date: Aug 4, 2008 09:20
On Aug 3, 10:27 pm, Koobee Wublee gmail.com> wrote:> On Aug 3, 10:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>> On Aug 3, 9:32 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>>> If you have actually learnt the mathematics dealing with the orbital
>>> increase, you will understand the approach to the conservation of
>>> energy with non-conservation of angular momentum is also a plausible
>>> explanation to the orbital increase of a binary system over time.
>
>> The stars are getting closer, not further apart.
>
> The eccentricity is increasing. The orbital speed is increasing as
> well.
>
> Intuition explains increasing eccentricity as decreasing orbital speed
> but not the mathematics involved. The closest approach is getting
> closer while the farthest distance is getting further away. The
> outcome of merging or flying apart is 50-50 not 100%% merging as
> predicted by GR interpreted to manifest in radiation of gravitational
> energy. ...
|
| Show full article (1.91Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Sue...Sue... Date: Aug 4, 2008 10:23
On Aug 4, 3:20 am, Eric Gisse gmail.com> wrote:> On Aug 3, 10:27 pm, Koobee Wublee gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Aug 3, 10:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>>> On Aug 3, 9:32 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>>>> If you have actually learnt the mathematics dealing with the orbital
>>>> increase, you will understand the approach to the conservation of
>>>> energy with non-conservation of angular momentum is also a plausible
>>>> explanation to the orbital increase of a binary system over time.
>
>>> The stars are getting closer, not further apart.
>
>> The eccentricity is increasing. The orbital speed is increasing as
>> well.
>
>> Intuition explains increasing eccentricity as decreasing orbital speed
>> but not the mathematics involved. The closest approach is getting ...
|
| Show full article (3.46Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: TravelerTraveler Date: Aug 4, 2008 11:11
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 02:00:29 -0700 (PDT), Erica Gisse
gmail.com> wrote:
[snip Erica's irrelevant shit]
Erica, remember that you're on the record for maintaining that
movement can happen in spacetime. It's right there in black and white
in this thread and forever saved for posterity by our good friend Mr.
Google. ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha...
Louis Savain
Rebel Science News:
http://rebelscience.blogspot.com/
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ian ParkerIan Parker Date: Aug 4, 2008 12:29
On 4 Aug, 09:23, "Sue..." yahoo.com.au> wrote:> On Aug 4, 3:20 am, Eric Gisse gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Aug 3, 10:27 pm, Koobee Wublee gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> On Aug 3, 10:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>>>> On Aug 3, 9:32 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>>>>> If you have actually learnt the mathematics dealing with the orbital
>>>>> increase, you will understand the approach to the conservation of
>>>>> energy with non-conservation of angular momentum is also a plausible
>>>>> explanation to the orbital increase of a binary system over time.
>
>>>> The stars are getting closer, not further apart.
>
>>> The eccentricity is increasing. The orbital speed is increasing as ...
|
| Show full article (4.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Sue...Sue... Date: Aug 4, 2008 12:55
On Aug 4, 6:29 am, Ian Parker gmail.com> wrote:> On 4 Aug, 09:23, "Sue..." yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>> On Aug 4, 3:20 am, Eric Gisse gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> On Aug 3, 10:27 pm, Koobee Wublee gmail.com> wrote:>
>>>> On Aug 3, 10:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>>>>> On Aug 3, 9:32 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>>>>>> If you have actually learnt the mathematics dealing with the orbital
>>>>>> increase, you will understand the approach to the conservation of
>>>>>> energy with non-conservation of angular momentum is also a plausible
>>>>>> explanation to the orbital increase of a binary system over time.
>
>>>>> The stars are getting closer, not further apart.
>
>>>> The eccentricity is increasing. The orbital speed is increasing as
>>>> well.
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.64Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ian ParkerIan Parker Date: Aug 4, 2008 13:12
On 4 Aug, 11:55, "Sue..." yahoo.com.au> wrote:> On Aug 4, 6:29 am, Ian Parker gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On 4 Aug, 09:23, "Sue..." yahoo.com.au> wrote:>
>>> On Aug 4, 3:20 am, Eric Gisse gmail.com> wrote:>
>>>> On Aug 3, 10:27 pm, Koobee Wublee gmail.com> wrote:>
>>>>> On Aug 3, 10:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>>>>>> On Aug 3, 9:32 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>>>>>>> If you have actually learnt the mathematics dealing with the orbital
>>>>>>> increase, you will understand the approach to the conservation of
>>>>>>> energy with non-conservation of angular momentum is also a plausible
>>>>>>> explanation to the orbital increase of a binary system over time. ...
|
| Show full article (5.38Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
