>
> e x variable = pi
> square x variable = circle
> cube x variable = sphere
>

> What is intriguing about that is that you cannot have these:
> pentagon x variable = circle
> dodecahedron x variable = sphere
>

> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

>>
>> e x variable = pi
>> square x variable = circle
>> cube x variable = sphere
>>

>
> Sorry, I meant that to be a Matrix solution set:
>
> e x variable = pi (note: where pi is a variable on the surface of a
> sphere)
> Logarithmic spiral arm x variable = specific circle
> square x variable = circle
> cube x variable = sphere
>
>

>> What is intriguing about that is that you cannot have these:
>> pentagon x variable = circle
>> dodecahedron x variable = sphere ...

>
> You are wrong about ther being 19 occupied subshells in plutonium.
>

> There are 7 shells in plutonium, of which each have respectivly:
> 1,2,3,4,5,6, and 7 subshells:
>
> K L M N O
> P Q
> 94 Pu 2, 2 6, 2 6 10, 2 6 10 14, 2 6 10 6 0, 2 6 0 0 0
> 0, 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 :

> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

>>
>> e x variable = pi
>> square x variable = circle
>> cube x variable = sphere
>>

>
> Sorry, I meant that to be a Matrix solution set:
>
> e x variable = pi (note: where pi is a variable on the surface of a
> sphere)
> Logarithmic spiral arm x variable = specific circle
> square x variable = circle
> cube x variable = sphere
>
>

>> What is intriguing about that is that you cannot have these:
>> pentagon x variable = circle
>> dodecahedron x variable = sphere ...

> What makes plutonium unique is not that it has 22 subshells in 7
> shells of which
> 19 are occupied, but what makes it unique from neptunium and americium
> is another
> physics constant and special number such as the inverse fine structure
> constant of
> 137. So is there a neptunium atom with 137 neutrons and is there a
> americium atom
> with 137 neutrons? Perhaps a isotope? Alright, so we have not narrowed
> down plutonium
> with the numbers 7, 22, 19 and 137. So we tack onto the narrowing down
> another number
> of physics that is special such as the Cosmic Microwave Background
> radiation temperature
> which is 2.71 Kelvin. Does the inside cavity of a neptunium or
> plutonium or americium
> atom yield 2.71 Kelvin? Now we have a uniqueness stranglehold on the
> chemical elements ...

> lundslakt...@yahoo.com wrote:
>

>>
>> You are wrong about ther being 19 occupied subshells in plutonium.
>>

>
> Not so, and let me change the problem around so you will not stumble
> on
> what is counted and not counted.
>
>

>> There are 7 shells in plutonium, of which each have respectivly:
>> 1,2,3,4,5,6, and 7 subshells:
>>
>> K L M N O
>> P Q
>> 94 Pu 2, 2 6, 2 6 10, 2 6 10 14, 2 6 10 6 0, 2 6 0 0 0
>> 0, 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 :

> ...

> There are 7 shells in plutonium, of which each have respectivly:
> 1,2,3,4,5,6, and 7 subshells:
>
> K L M N O
> P Q
> 94 Pu 2, 2 6, 2 6 10, 2 6 10 14, 2 6 10 6 0, 2 6 0 0 0
> 0, 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 :
>
> this gives 7 shells
> and 28 subshells
> and 22 occupied subshells,(if one count the O and P shells as full.)

>
> The only reasonable way to count occupied subshells are as the
> subshells
> Ks Ls Lp Ms M p Md.....etc
>

> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> (snipped)

>> What makes plutonium unique is not that it has 22 subshells in 7
>> shells of which
>> 19 are occupied, but what makes it unique from neptunium and americium
>> is another
>> physics constant and special number such as the inverse fine structure
>> constant of
>> 137. So is there a neptunium atom with 137 neutrons and is there a
>> americium atom
>> with 137 neutrons? Perhaps a isotope? Alright, so we have not narrowed
>> down plutonium
>> with the numbers 7, 22, 19 and 137. So we tack onto the narrowing down
>> another number
>> of physics that is special such as the Cosmic Microwave Background
>> radiation temperature
>> which is 2.71 Kelvin. Does the inside cavity of a neptunium or
>> plutonium or americium
>> atom yield 2.71 Kelvin? Now we have a uniqueness stranglehold on the ...