Re: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.physics.relativity only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

sci.physics.relativity Profile…
 Up
Re: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch         


Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:19

On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:08:59 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Jun 7, 12:59 pm, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 06:44:45 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Jun 7, 9:35 am, Helmut Wabnig
Show full article (6.57Kb)
4 Comments
Re: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch         


Author: mpc755
Date: Jun 8, 2010 00:33

On Jun 7, 4:19 pm, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:08:59 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Jun 7, 12:59 pm, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
>>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 06:44:45 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>>On Jun 7, 9:35 am, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 19:19:56 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>On Jun 6, 10:03 pm, Apostate yeehaw.org.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:46:03 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>The same numbers are here:
>
> ...
Show full article (7.52Kb)
no comments
Re: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch         


Author: mpc755
Date: Jun 8, 2010 00:41

On Jun 7, 4:19 pm, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:08:59 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Jun 7, 12:59 pm, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
>>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 06:44:45 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>>On Jun 7, 9:35 am, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 19:19:56 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>On Jun 6, 10:03 pm, Apostate yeehaw.org.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:46:03 -0700 (PDT), mpc755 gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>The same numbers are here:
>
> ...
Show full article (7.52Kb)
no comments
Re: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch         


Author: Uncle Al
Date: Jun 8, 2010 01:16

mpc755 wrote:
[snip rap]
> A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> C-60 molecule is always detected exiting a single slit because the
> C-60 molecule always enters and exits a single slit. It is the
> associated aether displacement wave which enters and exits multiple
> slits. The associated aether displacement wave creates interference
> upon exiting the slits which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
> travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
> associated aether displacement wave and there is no interference.

idiot

Hey stooopid - a body's wave-like and particle-like aspects cannot be
simultaneously observed. A system's any degree of freedom corresponds
to a conjugate pair of observables.
Show full article (1.53Kb)
no comments
Re: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch         


Author: Uncle Al
Date: Jun 8, 2010 01:16

mpc755 wrote:
[snip 175 lines of crap]
> The symmetry of a C-60 molecule allows it to be able to maintain its
> cohesion with its associated aether displacement.

Hey fucking stooopid - C70 diffracts as does any molecule, as do
photons, electrons, protons, and neutrons. You entirely missed the
point of the experiment.

Hey fucking stooopid - Colella-Overhauser-Werner and Bonse-Wroblewski
neutron interferometers; Kasevich-Chu atom interferometers.

idiot

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
no comments