> http://arxivblog.com/?p=460
> "Entanglement is the strange and beautiful property of certain quantum
> particles to become so deeply linked that they share the same
> existence. According to quantum theory, that link should be maintained
> whatever the distance between the particles, whether the width of an
> atom or the diameter of the universe. This led Einstein to claim that
> the instantaneous effects of entanglement would lead to “spooky action-
> at-a-distance” in violation of special relativity which prevents
> faster-than-light signals. Nobody knows how the different predictions
> of relativity and quantum mechanics can be resolved."
>
> http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm
> Bryan Wallace: "I expect that the scientists of the future will
> consider the dominant abstract physics theories of our time in much
> the same light as we now consider the Medieval theories of how many
> angels can dance on the head of a pin or that the Earth stands still
> and the Universe moves around it."
>
> Pentcho Valev ...

> On Jun 11, 8:29 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>>http://arxivblog.com/?p=460
>> "Entanglement is the strange and beautiful property of certain quantum
>> particles to become so deeply linked that they share the same
>> existence. According to quantum theory, that link should be maintained
>> whatever the distance between the particles, whether the width of an
>> atom or the diameter of the universe. This led Einstein to claim that
>> the instantaneous effects of entanglement would lead to “spooky action-
>> at-a-distance” in violation of special relativity which prevents
>> faster-than-light signals. Nobody knows how the different predictions
>> of relativity and quantum mechanics can be resolved."

>

>>http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm
>> Bryan Wallace: "I expect that the scientists of the future will ...

>The theory that predicts that the bug is both squashed and not
>squashed:

> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/Relativ/bugrivet.html

>and that a 80m long pole can be trapped inside a 40m long barn:

> http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/barn_pole.html

>is incompatible with the theory that predicts teleportation:

>

> On Jun 11, 9:43 pm, kp <4vec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>

>> On Jun 11, 8:29 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>>http://arxivblog.com/?p=460
>>> "Entanglement is the strange and beautiful property of certain quantum
>>> particles to become so deeply linked that they share the same
>>> existence. According to quantum theory, that link should be maintained
>>> whatever the distance between the particles, whether the width of an
>>> atom or the diameter of the universe. This led Einstein to claim that
>>> the instantaneous effects of entanglement would lead to “spooky action-
>>> at-a-distance” in violation of special relativity which prevents
>>> faster-than-light signals. Nobody knows how the different predictions
>>> of relativity and quantum mechanics can be resolved."

>

>>>http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm
>>> Bryan Wallace: "I expect that the scientists of the future will ...

>As far as SR goes there us nothing incompatible in these examples.
>They maybe counter intuitive but that doesn't mean they are
>unphysical.

> On Jun 11, 9:43 pm, kp <4vec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>

>> On Jun 11, 8:29 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>>http://arxivblog.com/?p=460
>>> "Entanglement is the strange and beautiful property of certain quantum
>>> particles to become so deeply linked that they share the same
>>> existence. According to quantum theory, that link should be maintained
>>> whatever the distance between the particles, whether the width of an
>>> atom or the diameter of the universe. This led Einstein to claim that
>>> the instantaneous effects of entanglement would lead to “spooky action-
>>> at-a-distance” in violation of special relativity which prevents
>>> faster-than-light signals. Nobody knows how the different predictions
>>> of relativity and quantum mechanics can be resolved."

>

>>>http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm
>>> Bryan Wallace: "I expect that the scientists of the future will ...

>You are assuming that length is something that is frame-independent --
>this is what you think "physically real" means.

> On Jun 11, 3:17 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Jun 11, 9:43 pm, kp <4vec...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>>> On Jun 11, 8:29 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>>> http://arxivblog.com/?p=460
>>>> "Entanglement is the strange and beautiful property of certain quantum
>>>> particles to become so deeply linked that they share the same
>>>> existence. According to quantum theory, that link should be maintained
>>>> whatever the distance between the particles, whether the width of an
>>>> atom or the diameter of the universe. This led Einstein to claim that
>>>> the instantaneous effects of entanglement would lead to “spooky action-
>>>> at-a-distance” in violation of special relativity which prevents
>>>> faster-than-light signals. Nobody knows how the different predictions ...

>
> "kp" <4vector@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:04180519-b395-482a-b834-058d093a147e@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

>>As far as SR goes there us nothing incompatible in these examples.
>>They maybe counter intuitive but that doesn't mean they are
>>unphysical.

>
> unphysical?
> like the "observational" change of length with speed yet with no
> physical proof of such ever occuring?
> or like the observational proof that all clocks that are not
> in your frame have slowed down according to your clock?
> PUH LEASE!
> It is not a matter of unphysical alone.
> It is a matter of non-scientific at all.
> rubber rulers and malfunctioning clocks is
> all they have to keep the "rubber sheet" Universe
> spinning. ...