As you know, I have been asking a lot of questions lately about
wavefunctions and Gaussians and the like.

You may have guessed that I am writing a paper about this, and if so you
would be right. ;-)

I believe there is enough developed now, and I think enough of the kinks
are now out, so you all may take a sneak preview. Thus, I have linked
my latest draft at:

http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/files/2008/05/heisenberg-and-schwinger-20.pdf

Setting aside the hypothesized connection between the magnetic anomaly
and uncertainty, Sections 4 through 7, which have not been posted in any
form previously, stand completely by themselves, irrespective of this
hypothesis. These sections are strictly mathematical in nature, and
they provide an exact measure for how the uncertainty associated with a
wavefunction varies upwards from hbar/2 as a function of the potential,
and the parameters of the wavefunction itself. The wavefunction
employed is completely general, and the uncertainty relation is driven
by a potential V.

This is still under development, but this should give you a very good
idea of where this is headed.

How do electrons which are repulsive form lightening? How would they
gather together in a stroke and be repulsive at the same time?

Now is everywhere in the universe from the first tick at the Beginning
of time till the infinite future. The rest of the universe is ticking
away simultanious to your now. The past doesn't exist anymore and the
future doesn't exist yet. All there is, was, or ever will be is a NOW.

Mitch Raemsch

Aether is the fastest time constant. Albert Einstein said that there
was only one constant in the universe and it is the speed of light in
vacuo.

On 30 Apr, 14:07, "Tom Potter" yahoo.com> wrote:

Excellent! My list contains one item:

On 29 Apr, 22:29, "Israel Did 9/11" googlemail.com>
wrote:

Just go back to the context! 9/11 stinks, of course, and though we
know the official report does not stack up, it was controlled
demolition, etc., etc., we have no smoking gun, only, until relatively
recently, smoking and toxic piles of rubble. It may have been a false
flag op to justify continuing intervention in the ME, and, though that
is mostly conjecture, it is possible.

It is a good question, why, having supported Saadam and his henchmen,
who treated their own people like dirt, the USA, almost overnight,
turned against him, invaded - with a program for instant democracy. Ho
hum. There may be other explanations, though!

i'm just starting study in special relativity in an undergrad course.

i can't quite figure this one out.

if i someone (A) is hurtling at a constant velocity of -0.75c toward
me, and from the other direction someone else (A') is hurtling at a
constant velocity of 0.75 toward me. What is the velocity of A' from
the reference frame of A?

thanks in advance for any help on this

cf

Gravity is a push. The action is in space.

MItch Raemsch

This is the correct Doppler formula for all moving
bodies,

f' = Exp(-v/c) f

where,
f is the ffrequency at the source, and
f' is the observed frequency.

If the observer and the source are moving directly
away from each other, the velocity is v > 0, and v < 0
if they are approaching.

Consider now, the relativistic Doppler formula

f_r' = sqrt((1 - v/c)/(1 + v/c)) f

We can expand both equations, f' and f_r', in their
respective power series until any arbitrary order, and
see the ratio f'/f_r is

f'/f_r = 1 - x^3/3 - x^5/5 + x^6 /18 - x^7/7 + ...

where x = v/c.

So, in any experimental test for that ratio, you'd have
to deal with measurement accuracies that could at
least make the term x^3/3 significant.

I am trying to pinpoint the precise origins of the the term d/dJ which
appears as the argument in the potential V(d/dJ) in the so-called
"Central Identity of Quantum Field Theory," given on page 460 of Zee's
QFT in an Nutshell, and especially how one gets from V(x) --> V(d/dJ).

I have outlined my queries about this in a one page file linked below,
which also ties this query together with some of my other recent
queries:

http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/central-identity.pdf .

Any help is appreciated. If clicking the link above does not work, then
right click and download the file, then open.

Thanks,

Jay.
____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email: jyablon@nycap.rr.com
co-moderator: sci.physics.foundations
Weblog: http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/
Web Site: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm