Kip Thorn has said that black holes to not cause matter to fall faster
than light. Instead he said that matter would only reach light speed.
But even that is in contradiction to the Special theory of Relativity.
According to Einstein matter cannot reach light speed.

Kip Thorn made an excuse to preserve everyone's confidence in the
theory of black holes. But the fact that they are in contradiction to
the laws of motion prove that they are a point of failure.

Einstein himself knew there was something wrong with his theory's
prediction of a star that collapses to a point or becomes a black
hole.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Time slowdown in GR effects light speed metric. Light moves at C but
in slower time. Shapiro shows we have to wait on light in gravity.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Law enforcement is now intercepting text messages,
as proven by Operation Sudden Fall in San Diego.

http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/states/newsrel/sd050608.html
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/education/20080506-1338-bn06sdsu2.html

Don't let your personal SMS/text messages fall into
the wrong hands. Encrypt your messages with one
of these:

http://www.CryptoSMS.org
http://www.CryptoSMS.com
http://www.FortressMail.net/fortress_sms.htm
http://www.Cop2p.com/encrypted_sms.html

Be Safe, Be Encrypted, Fuck the Police!!

The fastest motion in the universe
Waving at light speed
in fastest time or clock

Light speed is the one constant in the universe according to Einstein
Light is the two forces of electricity and magnetism which are one
Unified force
Light is the absolute frame; you can move with respect to it revealed
by Doppler

Mitch Raemsch; falling light changes colour; gravitational time
effects light's energy

On 9 mei, 18:17, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
canonicalscience.com> wrote:

In the time before time, in the time even before legend.

When I see sky I only see small stars twinkling at night.

Now When I see sky with a large telescope I will again see many stars.

How do I know whether a twinkling Object is a Star from our Galxy or
it is some other Galaxy.

How do scientist see the very far away Galaxies and see Billions of
Stars in it.

Can they really see each star in the Galaxy and how do they count that
there are 100 Billion stars in that galaxy.

It may happen That is just a Star with a Billions of small planet
sized things.

And when we are living inside the Galaxy how do astronomers descide
that our galaxy is spiral.

As far as I know whichever direction I see I can see infinite number
of stars.

So what are they basis of these assumption?

What I bilieve is stars are randomly distributed throughout the
Universe.

And Universe is Finite or Infinite is again a Question.

Say Universe is Finite then it must have some Shape.

Hi Ng

after thinking about this for a while I have to state, that the em-force
and gravity describe exactly the same 'mechanism'.
It's is different to us, since we give certain relations different
names. Gravity...

"The Einstein Hoax"

The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast shuffle"
which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen to be a
mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations...

Let us consider the simple case of addition of velocities
along a straight line. The incompleteness of SR resides
in the fact that a speed v can't currently be experimentally
distinguished from its rapidity r = arctanh(v/c), for values
of that beta = v/c below the third-order term approximation.
The power series expansion of r = arctanh(v/c) is

r = v/c + v*3/3c^3+ v^5/5c^5 + v^7/7c^7 + ...

Provide references of any experimental test of SR, showing
that the rapidity r can be distinguished from its beta v/c, beyond
its second-order approximation. Prove at least that the third-order
term v*3/3c^3 lives outside the error bars. Since, we can't still
perform such accurate experimental tests, we must conclude
the addition of velocities still remains within the euclidean sum
of vectors

w = u + v.

That sum can't still be experimentally distinguished from the sum
of rapidities

arctanh(w/c) = arctanh(u/c) + arctanh(v/c).

In addition, we must also conclude that the relativistic Doppler