Move in space toward light or away and its energy changes or shifts.
CMBR anisotropy reveals our absolute motion in space. There is No
Absolute Rest acccording to Albert Einstein

Mitch Raemsch; Falling light changes colour

Dear Newsgroup:

In order not to confuse my mathematics with those of new math, as the
general public is known, I will call it NEW EXACT MATH (since it is
primarily dealing with closed form solutions).

The following are sites you need to see some of my files:

http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1726436&tstart=0

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6176141&tstart=15

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6177838&tstart=15

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6178645&tstart=15

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6179319&tstart=15

http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1733512&tstart=0

http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1738753&tstart=0

The way of presentations of problems and some of its solutions, you
will see that we are dealing with a new revolution in mathematics.

This is different than those of mainstream researches published and
forgotten later.

These will remain with us for centuries to come.

The proof is based on its actual solving in my lecture notes (of the
future).

Duration is infinitely divisable. This is Zeno applied to time. What
you think of as Planck time is infinitely divisable. Anything that is
not infinitely small is infinitely divisable.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

It is hypersphere. It is the 4th dimension's surface that is perfectly
round. The curved universe is the hypersurface of the 4 dimensional
hypersphere. The hypersphere is expanding and the universe is growing
away from the 4 dimensional center. There is no outside. There is only
one universe with a beginning to time of which there was no before.
The future is infinite. The future of the hypersphere is Infinity.

Mitch Raemsch

Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Mitch Raemsch

I once heard that everything is relative, except the speed of light,
which is absolute...

is that true really? if living things cannot see, and therefore not
be able to see light, then maybe we will think everything is relative,
as we don't know light exists.

we often hear that when the speed of an object increases (close to the
speed of light), then its mass increases, and its length decreases...
is it "absolute speed" here or "relative speed"? is it true that only
an observer which sees that object moving close to the speed of light
will measure that increase of mass and decrease of length, but let's
say there is an ant on that moving object, the ant won't measure the
object having increased mass and decreased length.

(once i heard that an object cannot move faster than the speed of
light, as the mass will approach infinity and therefore no energy is
enough to make it move faster... so is that not true, since its mass
according to the ant is unchanged).

sorry can things be discussed as if it is explained to a 10-year
old? Thanks very much for answering to such a simplistic question.

The previous plots I've shown have all used significant electronic Kerr
frame dragging effects (magnetism). The scaling of electronics that unifies
with gravity produces much smaller frame dragging effects. So, I
parameterized as for unification, and ran some computer simulations, and got
some interesting results. I generated a type of orbit that, well, you have
to see to believe. These were monte carlo simulations were the flight path
of the electron in hydrogen's n = 1 shell was randomly perturbed up/down,
producing a small change in inclination after every integration step. The
state into the integrator was jumped forward deterministically as according
the electronic Kerr equations of motion, then the resultant velocity vector
lofted or depressed according to a small random up or down draw...

"The Brilliance of Our Teachers"

A recent newspaper question and answer column raised an interesting
subject. The query noted that, for a science course at a local school, there
were two instructors. One of those instructors explained the concepts
clearly and his students did well on standardized tests. The other
instructor's teachings were scattered and his students performed poorly. The
students, however, believed that the second instructor was brilliant and
thought that his explanations are simply over their heads. The query went on
to ask why such a misperception occurred.

The answer given was that both groups were easily misled into believing
that mysterious people are highly intelligent. When those listeners heard
material they didn't grasp, they assumed that the fault was theirs and not
the teachers. And, since the listeners considered themselves fairly
intelligent, it was obvious that the teacher must be brilliant!

Dear Newsgroup:

Mass and energy are two major components of the universe.

Thus the equation, E = m c^2 represents one of the important formulas
in the universe (within the domain of physics).

As I had mentioned before the abstract formula of Riccati differential
equation

dx/dt + x^2 = g(t)

is another important one (within the domain of mathematics).

There is no doubt that, from the mathematical equations, we can always
conclude about the behavior of the physical world (and visa versa).

Thus eventually questions will arise from one formula to the other,
about inner characteristics of both of them.

It remains to be seen, how the future researchers in both domain
determine the outcome of their comparison studies?

Dr.M.Basti