Infinite density cannot expand. The particles are stacked just like
the deck.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laurate 2008

On 30 Apr, 17:01, foolsrushout <6...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quasars meet the condition of the extreme gravitational field. They
are redshift objects about one light week in diameter yet have the
mass of a galaxy. Their extreme redshift comes from gravitation first
and can be distance second for those at the distance extreme.

There is no edge to the universe where these objects exist. Quasars
are evenly distributed throughout the universe near and far.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

http://thomashawk.com/hello/209/1017/1024/Johnny%%20Cash%%20Finger.jpg

And PZ Myers, you self-deluded babbling NUTCASE...

the ORIGINAL *KING OF TERROR* VIDEO.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGsOqPDkIZY

the *MODEL* of mental health:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=zBEbfiaZTfc

"Look at the ANGLE OF THE KEY....see that, see that...."

what an idiot this Randi is.....a REAL CRITICAL THINKER....

Visit:

http://www.centerforinquiry.net/forums/viewthread/3283/P0/

to see how we stopped the MILLION DOLLAR PARANORMAL challenge.....
watch carefully the consequences of Randi's *idea*.....

For over 40 years James Randi Zwigert (is this even a REAL NAME?) has
had total control over who and how the testing was conducted, yet
despite all this he has terminated the challenge.

The ONLY REASON why the challenge was stopped is because he lost and
refused to pay.
Apparently, Randi likes to break the rules when it serves him:

The end stage of matter is neutron. There is nothing holding up
neutronium therefor there is no barrier.

Mitch Raemsch; Falling light changes colour

A rocket with length h accelerates with acceleration g. A light source
at the front end emits light with speed c (relative to the source),
frequency f and wavelength L. The receiver at the back end measures
the (shifted) frequency:

(1) f' = f(1+v/c) = f(1+gh/c^2)

where v is the relative speed of the light source (at the moment of
emission) and the receiver (at the moment of reception). Equation (1)
has been verified experimentally (Pound and Rebka) and can be found in
textbooks.

A second textbook equation Einsteinians should never forget:

(2) frequency = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

Finally, the combination of (1) and (2) gives, for the speed of light
c' measured by the receiver, the equation deduced by Einstein in 1911:

(3) c'= c+v = c(1+gh/c^2); L' = L

AHAHAHAHAHA... Priceless! ... AHAHAHAHA!...

"Helmut Wabnig" wrote in message
news:i98p14hqd1nte2b0o9p0ss388u9bbhdnfj@4ax.com...

TimE ameritech.net> wrote:

"Helmut Wabnig" wrote

hanson wrote: ...

Kip Thorn dismissed the fact that objects would fall faster than
light inside a black hole. He claimed they only reach light speed.
But if they reach light speed at the event horizon how are they not
going to be propelled faster by the even greater gravity inside?

No. Kip Thorn was making an excuse to preserve Black Hole theory.
Let's say he is correct that matter reaches only light speed; still
this is a violation of Special Relativity. Matter cannot reach light
speed according to Albert Einstein. If it did it would disappear from
time.

Matter reaching light speed is what disproves Black Holes at
their event horizons because they violate Special Relativity.

The second excuse that might be made is that matter does not even
reach (or fall to) the light speed limit that Kip Thorn suggested.

But time ends at the event horizon for matter causing the theoretical
redshift and blueshift of light to go infinite which is a nonsense as
prediction. Light's energy would go infinite by blue
shift and zero by redshift at the event horizon. These predictions
are the complete failure of black hole theory.

If cosmic radiation comes and hits from all directions, is there
any possibility that gravity is because the pressure from these
particles interacting more with metals and heavy particles?

If this is the case, then gravity is not geometry and space-time
is a mokup and nothing else

It is said that a speeding clock shows less elapsed time than
the stay-at-home clock, because (if already speeding) it is
running at a slower rate. Or else, because it had run at a
slower rate when it was speeding, assuming now it is
stopped near the stay-at-home clock.

The funny thing about this is that time and length change
at the same time, but not the ratio between both (velocity).

If we keep length constant, the only possible solution is
uniform circular motion. That is a twin travelling in circles,
of constant radius r, around the first twin assumed to be
stopped at the center of rotation.

Let's say the radius r is a constant value of 100 light-seconds
(r = 100c).
The speeding twin goes on a spaceship at 0.999c.
Therefore, the angular speed 'omega' is v/r = 0.999c/100c
= 0.01 rad/s.
The speeding twin takes 628 seconds to have a complete turn
of 360 degrees.