sci.physics.relativity
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.physics.relativity only
 
Advanced search
May 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
   1234 18
567891011 19
12131415161718 20
19202122232425 21
262728293031  22
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.physics.relativity Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Mass as undectable as steady motion         


Author: mitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 14, 2008 15:27

The only way we experience mass is by its weight or through its
acceleration which gives a weight push in the opposite direction. We
have all experienced it in a car for example.

I call this change of motion gravity where weight becomes a push in
the opposite direction of change in motion through space.

The creation of motion or acceleration is where it is detectable.

Mass can be calculated by the gravitational field it produces. In this
way we can weigh the worlds.

Mitch Raemsch
21 Comments
  GR and SR; Acceleration creates motion         


Author: mitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 14, 2008 15:09

The first principle of motion: Motion has to be created and that is
by
accelerelation.

Acceleration passes through every instantaneous speed.

Acceleration is detectable as weight fluctuation. Gravity is steady
state.

Einstein divided his theories when he shouldn't have. Detected
acceleration is how speed is calculated. Motion is detected at its
creation.

Mitch Raemsch
8 Comments
  Re: Albert's Fallacy         


Author: The TimeLord
Date: May 14, 2008 08:38

Am Tue, 13 May 2008 17:26:03 -0500 schrieb WF11@webtv.net
(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=DF=83--_=B9=B9?=) in
21626-482A157B-584@storefull-3312.bay.webtv.net:
> One of the main foundations of the General Theory is the famous
> equivalence principle.
>
> it states that gravitational and inertial mass are equivalent. This idea
[...]
> There are actually several experiments:
>
> 1. - If the room was on the surface of a planet, a sensitive gravity
> meter would show a difference in weight, if it was moved a short
> distance above the floor.

That is because of the r^2 effect; not any violation of the equivalence
principle.
Show full article (3.08Kb)
1 Comment
  "The Matter of "Dark Matter"         


Author: Elcy
Date: May 14, 2008 06:58

"The Matter of "Dark Matter"

There have been many postings about the mysterious "Dark Matter" which
is alleged to constitute 90 to 95%% of the mass(energy) content of the
Universe. The presence of this "Dark Matter" is indicated...
Show full article (7.10Kb)
2 Comments
  Why were scientists unable to predict Earth Quake in China?         


Author: Sanny
Date: May 14, 2008 04:26

In china earthquake killed 12,000 people. Why Scientists with fast
computers unable to predict the EarthQuake?

I think the vibration of Earth work on Physics principle.

Here is my technique to predict earthquake by simulation of earth
structure. Things that cause earth quake are.

1. Tension in earth Crust.
2. Temperature and pressure at various points on earth crust.
3. Material of Earth Crust madeup of
4. Wind/ Rains etc
5. Man Made Structures like Bridges/ Dams.
6. History of previous Earth Quakes.
7. What causes EarthQuakes.

Once you collect all the data then On a Super Computer we can predict
when will Earth Quake happen.

So if we know there is going to be a Earth Quake people can migrate to
other countries till EarthQuake is over saving 10,000 lives every
year.
Show full article (1.33Kb)
14 Comments
  Re: Asymptotical error bars in SR prove its incompleteness         


Author: Albertito
Date: May 14, 2008 02:12

On May 14, 3:31 am, PD gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 13, 5:51 am, Albertito gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 13, 11:24 am, PD gmail.com> wrote:
>> [snipped]
>
>>> Of course you can. You didn't read what I wrote. You time a muon in
>>> flight the same way you could a car on the highway: you time its
>>> crossings on successive, spaced gates. (Note you don't have to follow
>>> the car all the way from the garage to do so.) You make a scintillator
>>> paddle triplet, with each paddle separated by some appreciable
>>> difference (say, 20m), and then the signals from each of the
>>> scintillators to an o'scope or a TDC by an equal length cable. 20 m
>>> would be about 60 ns if the speed were as high as c, trivial to
>>> measure by either of the devices mentioned. The presence of the MIP
>>> signal in all three paddles assures that you are seeing the passage of
>>> the muon. You measure the distance, and you measure the time it takes
>>> the muon to cover that distance. You have a direct measurement of the ...
Show full article (2.66Kb)
2 Comments