sci.physics.relativity
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.physics.relativity only
 
Advanced search
April 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 14
78910111213 15
14151617181920 16
21222324252627 17
282930     18
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.physics.relativity Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Kerr Model for Hydrogen         


Author: Steve Bell
Date: May 4, 2008 23:28

I parameterized an electronic Kerr field for ground state hydrogen. The
electron started at the Schroedinger/Bohr radius and stayed there for the
creation of a shell. Let me stress I imposed the nonrelativistic initial
conditions, I wanted see to if they could merge with the electronic Kerr
frame dragging effects and not disturb the energy. During the entire time in
the shell, if struck by a photon equal to the nonrelativistic Schroedinger
energy, it would jump, ionizing the atom. Even though nonrelativistic in
energy, the electronic Kerr frame dragging effects (magnetism) caused a
change in plane and a shell gets filled in. Bear in mind, one of these
orbits completes in only about 2 x 10^-16 of a second, so a shell completes
in a phenomenally small time. This might be the reason why an atom...
Show full article (1.42Kb)
2 Comments
  Time taken by electron to revolve arround Nucleus?         


Author: Sanny
Date: May 4, 2008 22:38

How much time it takes for an electron to revolve arround an Nucleus?

What is the speed of electron arround the Nucleus.

And how much time it takes for electron to spin?

What is the radius of electron?

Why is electron 1000s time smaller than Proton/Nutron but has equal
amount of charge as that of Proton Just with -vs

Bye
Sanny
16 Comments
  Everything is made of Dark matter         


Author: mitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 4, 2008 20:55

Like the rest of the universe the Earth and Sun and stars are made
primarily of Dark matter. There was a lot more Dark matter at the Big
Bang than there was normal matter.

Tee.Hee.
10 Comments
  Pound Rebka and energy transition of light out of gravity         


Author: mitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 4, 2008 20:45

The progressive redshift to light as it comes out of gravity is really
the expansion of the light wavelength size. Near the event horizon of
a black hole the size of light coming out mathmatically moves toward
infinite wavelength or infinite red shift. But there is a problem with
this growing size. It is going to get bigger and bigger. What must be
explained is the size of the wave must grow at the speed of light
until it reaches the full size of its low energy.

Light is a local phenomenon thus near field EM photonics and the idea
of growing light waves. For imaginations sake take an ultra low energy
light wave emitted close to a black hole. If by size it is as big as
the solar system it could not appear all at once. That would require
instantaous creation accross all of space. If Einstein is right it has
to be a local phenomenon starting small and growing at light speed. In
other words it is waving at light speed.

Mitch Raemsch; Falling light changes colour
1 Comment
  New gas mode ether-drift experiments proposed         


Author: Surfer
Date: May 4, 2008 20:27

Precision tests with a new class of dedicated ether-drift experiments
M. Consoli, E. Costanzo
Eur. Phys. Journ. C
http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0979

Abstract
In principle, by accepting the idea of a non-zero vacuum energy, the
physical vacuum of present particle physics might represent a
preferred reference frame. By treating this quantum vacuum as a
relativistic medium, the non-zero energy-momentum flow expected in a
moving frame should effectively behave as a small thermal gradient and
could, in principle, induce a measurable anisotropy of the speed of
light in a loosely bound system as a gas. We explore the
phenomenological implications of this scenario by considering a new
class of dedicated ether-drift experiments where arbitrary gaseous
media fill the resonating optical cavities. Our predictions cover most
experimental set up and should motivate precise experimental tests of
these fundamental issues.
183 Comments
  INVITATION TO JEFF RELF         


Author: George Hammond
Date: May 4, 2008 17:17

>
>
>[Jeff Relf]
>Which cigarettes are as wide as a wooden matchstick ( 1 mm ) ?
>I once found ( and smoked ) a 1 mm wide cigarette
>and loved it, but I didn't note the brand name.
>
>
[Hammond]
The name of the cigarette is Capri, 120x3 mm
smoking is bad for you.... however, even Einstein smoked
occasionally.

INVITATION TO JEFF RELF

My 6th sense tells me you are bright enough to understand
the S.P.O.G. (Hammond's Scientific Proof of God, 2003)
Dunno why I havenÂ’t run into you before?

Apparently you understand SR-GR sufficiently
Apparently you know what an eigenvector is.
Apparently you understand psychology sufficiently.
Show full article (1.15Kb)
7 Comments
  What is Sun made of?         


Author: Sanny
Date: May 4, 2008 10:22

Ofcource Hydrogen & Helium. But what else?

We know Hydrogen & Helium are gases so they are seen at the top of
Sun.

But whaty about the Core? Is there any Solid Crust under the Gases?

Is there Molten Lava (Iron) Just like we have molten lava inside Earth
Crust?

Is All Iron inside the Earth Crust in Molten State? Why is Earth so
hot inside it is because of High Pressure of Mass on Earth?

If we dig Suns Crusr will we find Molten Iron under its Crust

Is Sun due to high Temperature in Gaseous State Or it has Solid &
Liquid.

If Earth Soil is thrown on Sun will the Soil melt?

Can the Soil convert into gas if thrown on such high temperature? Can
Iron be seen as a Gas in Sun?

What is the Boiling temperature of Clay/ Iron etc Can we Melt and
convert clay into molten state and then further burn it to convert
into gaseous State?

Bye
Sanny
37 Comments
  "The Paradox of Zeno"         


Author: Esab
Date: May 4, 2008 08:44

"The Paradox of Zeno"

The Paradox of Zeno is 2000 years old and its apparent ability to prove
that all motion is impossible was not resolved until the mathematical
techniques of Calculus became available, even though...
Show full article (3.83Kb)
no comments
  Richard Hoagland and David Farrell: the face on Mars might be yours ... .         


Author: foolsrushin.
Date: May 4, 2008 08:41

Scumbags, servitors and vertically challenged debunkers or, to put it
more politely, the dumb and stoopid, will not like what they have to
say. Solution: crap somewhere else!

In conversation with the delightful Kevin Smith, Farrell and Hoagland,
though from different disciplines and studies, conclude that there was
a sort of Cosmic War, a long, long way back - and of which we may have
been the products or even, in a way, the instigators, though I think
they suspect the former! Judge for yourself!

http://kevinsmith.mypodcast.com/ [Just get the Hoagland/Farrell ones!]

I am very interested in their findings, but I don't intend to stop for
passengers, whatever the good and decent Geopelia may think of me!

Enjoy!
--
'foolsrushin.'
no comments
  This is the most concise refution of SR ever         


Author: Albertito
Date: May 4, 2008 05:24

Replace rapidity by its beta.
1 Comment
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9