> Jeff☠Relf wrote:

>> In General Relativity,
>> time can not be curved without also curving space;
>> otherwise, c would not be a universal constant.

>
> This is not true. In GR, c is a universal constant that is the speed of
> light MEASURED LOCALLY. In any manifold with any metric one can always
> find Riemann normal coordinates at any point, which in GR are the same
> as local Minkowski coordinates in which the LOCAL speed of light is
> isotropically c.

>

> I will say one thing about tensor's and the notation systems used for

> I wish that the subscripts and superscripts had been placed on the left,
> rather than the right.
>
> Don't you agree?

> On Dec 16, 10:14 am, Pepe le Pew biteme.com> wrote:

>> BURT wrote:

>>> The galaxies are not moving through a preexisting space away from one
>>> another. Instead space is expanding. The red shift from motion and
>>> Space expansion are equivalent. We can calculate galactic distances
>>> because of this equivalence. Universal Expansion is Distance growing.
>>> The curved space-time continuum is expanding. This is the growing of
>>> the hypersphere and surface; or a closed universe; finite yet
>>> unbounded with space curving back on itself in the 4th dimension.
>>> Atronomers calculate the age of the universe from the most distant
>>> objects. They are said to lay 13 billion light years away. So because
>>> they believe the past lies in the distance they calculate the age of
>>> the universe to be 13 billion years.
>>> They left out the time it took for these galaxies to expand out to
>>> this distance. They left out universal expansion that brings them out
>>> to distance.
>>> I calculate the age of the universe to be a combination of the time it
>>> took for the universe to expand to what we see and add the time it
>>> took for light to come back to us. The universe expanded for 22 ...

> Greetings to all http://ommyemelina.tripod.com/hentai-xxx-games.html
> hentai xxx games
> http://ommyemelina.tripod.com/free-hentai-games-sephiria.html free
> hentai games sephiria
> http://ommyemelina.tripod.com/hentai-games-free.html hentai games
> free
> http://ommyemelina.tripod.com/halloween-anime-hentai-games.html
> halloween anime hentai games
> http://ommyemelina.tripod.com/hentai-web-games.html hentai web games

> BURT wrote:

>> Moving through space or falling toward light as it comes out of
>> gravity blue shifts it. GPS.
>> Falling through space along the direction of motion of a light beam
>> will redshift it.
>>
>> GPS.
>> MItch Raemsch -- Falling Toward Light --

>
> So, how do you explain this: Accelerating away from a light source
> causes it to alternate between red and blue in the rear view mirror.
>
> Happens in my Porsche all the time.
>

> The galaxies are not moving through a preexisting space away from one
> another. Instead space is expanding. The red shift from motion and
> Space expansion are equivalent. We can calculate galactic distances
> because of this equivalence. Universal Expansion is Distance growing.
>
> The curved space-time continuum is expanding. This is the growing of
> the hypersphere and surface; or a closed universe; finite yet
> unbounded with space curving back on itself in the 4th dimension.
>
> Atronomers calculate the age of the universe from the most distant
> objects. They are said to lay 13 billion light years away. So because
> they believe the past lies in the distance they calculate the age of
> the universe to be 13 billion years.
> They left out the time it took for these galaxies to expand out to
> this distance. They left out universal expansion that brings them out
> to distance.
> I calculate the age of the universe to be a combination of the time it
> took for the universe to expand to what we see and add the time it
> took for light to come back to us. The universe expanded for 22 ...

> On Dec 13, 6:53 am, GSS yahoo.com> wrote:

>> How can spacetime "dragging"_be_physical in any sense if the
>> "spacetime" itself is not a physical entity???

>
> In the sense I wrote: the spinning object does affect space and time
> measurements in a way that's consistent with certain pop-sci
> presentations, e.g. satellites of the object begin to orbit it in the
> direction of the spin. This is popularly presented as "the spinning
> object drags space around it". Whether this popular presentation is in
> fact based on something strict is not known at this point as GR itself
> is silent on the issue. Perhaps a more general theory will feature
> some "stuff" that does get "dragged". We don't know yet.