Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --

johnreed Take 24 - What is Super Electromagnetic 'Gravitation'?
modified Friday, December 28, 2007

Concept continued from recent prior posts:

... what then does the planet attractor act on if not on inertial
mass? The planet attractor acts on matter. At first thought, with
this conclusion, I appear to have returned to pre-Newtonian physics.
This is a momentary illusion. Newtonian physics applies to us as
inertial mass objects, and our quantitative interaction with inertial
mass objects, which quantity inertial mass, is emergent in the
electromagnetic universe (see my most recent, prior posts on mass and
the electromagnetic universe).

What immediate benefit arises from this view? Had Newton known of
atoms and the periodic table he would have had something more
fundamentally universal than the quantitative, but nonetheless
subjective, less fundamentally universal, inertial mass matter, to
work with. Stable inertial mass matter today, reduces to stable atoms.
The planet attractor acts on atoms (see Uncle Al's independent (but
supporting) experimental results), which is our gateway into super-
electromagnetic, so called "gravitational" attraction.

Is Mass an Emergent quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
Research Results on Centripetal Force, Part 2
Math and Universe, Part 4
modified December 29, 2007
John Lawrence Reed, Jr.

Isaac Newton defined centripetal force in terms of his second and
third law, to act at a distance, by setting his first law object on a
circular path of motion, at a uniform orbital speed. Newton allowed
the moving inertial object to impact the internal side of the circle
circumference at equidistant points to inscribe a regular polygon. He
dropped a radius to the center of the polygon from each vertex (B) of
the polygon to describe any number of equal area triangles. "...but
when the body is arrived at B, suppose that a centripetal force acts
at once with a great impulse..." (Principia)

To argue for his supposition, Newton took the triangle base length,
toward the infinitesimal limit approaching zero. The base length, and
the infinitesimal arc of the velocity driven and time consuming...

sure, they do!

you are sort of like AP or HSJ on sci.math,
totally paralinguistic, but with a literate, Hemingwayesque twist.

not saying that you couldn't get an editor
to remove 99.44%% of it, dysguised as a testable theory,
dood!

thus:
oops; some dude posted before me,
in the same minute (10:37 AM, here-abouts),
The Math:

my guess is, No, but
the answer would require "single-variable linear algebra"
-- have to go, now!

The findings of the Pioneer team are truly astounding, as the team
detected an ostensible acceleration of 8e-10 m/s/s at a range of 8
billion miles, far beyond Pluto, with an 8 watt onboard radio that
returned the Doppler signal.

But get this, the force responsible for the Ap acceleration was less
than 1 micro-ounce acting on a 223kg or 500 pound vehicle.
F = MA = 223kg*8e-10mss = 1.7e-7N = .6 micro-ounce.
And this includes 10%% due to the radio itself or .06 micro-ounce
Even the electric field from the radio, is only 2.4e-12V/m
or 2.4 micro-micro-volts/meter.
This shows that engineering or applied physics (no, engineering) knows
how to measure Ap, but theoretical physics is unable to produce the
cause.
Amazing.

John Polasek

Part 1
In a place far away, once upon a day, I was born a troll.
It became immediately clear once I could see that:

Light speed is different for observers moving relative to it.

When we start moving towards the source of a radio signal, or light,
then we pass through more maxima and minima of the wave in the same time.
We can measure this, it is called Doppler, and used for RADAR for example.
So, as we moved through more periods in the same time, the wave must have
passed us faster, light speed was observed to be higher for us, blue shift.

The next thing I noticed was that you can NEVER move something faster then the
wave you are moving it with, a surfer can NEVER move faster then the waves.
So this is why infinite electromagnetic energy will not move a particle faster
then the speed of that EM radiation itself.

The third thing I realised, and that needs to be taken in consideration, is that
glass objects, such as mirrors and lenses, re-emit light always at local speed
c relative to themselves.
So any speed measurement using pieces of glass, or similar, are by definition suspect,
if this effect is not accounted for.

The fourth thing I noticed immediately, was that relativity is worse the epicycles.

"Retic Postings and SPAM"

There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H.E. Retic
are SPAM. The writer's postings are carefully constructed so as remain
within the commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:

1. Postings of essentially identical material shall not be made to more
than eight Newsgroups. The writer has limited his postings to seven
Newsgroups.

2. Postings of essentially identical material shall not be made more
frequently than every 14 days. The writer's posting are separated by a
longer time span.

3. Postings shall be reasonably close to the topic to which the
Newsgroups is dedicated. My postings are closer to being on topic for each
Newsgroup than are most of the postings within that group.

4. The postings shall not be used for commercial purposes. They are
not.

5. There shall be no alteration of the header material of the
postings. While the postings are made under many different E-mail names,
however my ISP provides for multiple user names and permits them to be
altered at will.

--- CALL FOR PAPERS ---

---------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING (OSC'08)
---------------------------------------------------------

August 25-29, 2008, Vienna, Austria
In conjunction with the 7th International Conference on Unconventional
Computation (UC'08)

WEB PAGE:

http://www.cs.ubbcluj.ro/~moltean/osc2008
http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~osc2008

FORUM:
http://groups.google.com/group/optical-supercomputing?hl=en

SCOPE