sci.physics.relativity
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
Your Ad Here
sci.physics.relativity only
 
Advanced search
May 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
   1234 18
567891011 19
12131415161718 20
19202122232425 21
262728293031  22
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.physics.relativity Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...


 Up
  A Letter Of Einstein 1954         


Author: Basti05b
Date: May 16, 2008 01:30

Dear Newsgroup:

The following news was on CBC on May 15,2008:

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/05/15/einstein-letter.html
{
Einstein letter dismissing God sells for
$330,000 US
Last Updated: Thursday, May 15, 2008 | 5:19 PM ET
CBC News
A letter written by Albert Einstein in which he dismissed belief in
God as a “product of human weaknesses” was auctioned off Thursday for
more than $330,000 US, destroying previous selling records of letters
by the renowned physicist.

The letter, written in German in 1954 to philosopher Eric Gutkind, was
sold in London, England, by Bloomsbury Auctions to a private
collector. It had initially been expected to fetch between $12,000 US
and $16,000 US.

“It beats the world record for an Einstein letter by about four
times," managing director Rupert Powell told the Guardian newspaper.
"It's a massive difference."
Show full article (1.98Kb)
1 Comment
  Note on SS.         


Author: Ken S. Tucker
Date: May 16, 2008 01:17

Hi fella's, I was hoping to further justify a
statement I posted. concerning Eq.(kst1) below...

On May 15, 1:19 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
> Where linearizing GR is concerned, I think it's possible.
> A brief and noisy discussion occurred late year in this
> SPF thread, regarding Orthogonality,
> "Flat/Curved SpaceTime."
>
> How we can understand *covariant and contravariant*
> geometric projections is depicted in Figure 1 in this link,
> I find, the linear expression of GR is formally expressed by,
>
> x_u x_u = x^u x^u , {u=0,1,2,3} , Eq.(kst1)
>
> with the summation convention applying and is generally
> true. The details are explained in "Flat/Curved SpaceTime",
> that were posted last year.
Show full article (2.22Kb)
no comments
  How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp.         


Author: davidmabus2010
Date: May 15, 2008 23:03

now with EMBEDDED VIDEOS!

FINAL DRAFT FOR MASS CIRCULATION:

please FWD your appreciations to randi@randi.org and
richard.dawkins@oum.ox.ac.uk

SEE HOW WE CAUSED THE PRESIDENT OF AMERICAN ATHEISTS, ELLEN JOHNSON,
TO QUIT HER JOB AND STOPPED RANDI'S MILLION DOLLAR PARANORMAL
CHALLENGE:

for randi & dawkins and all the so-called "critical thinkers"

the ORIGINAL *KING OF TERROR* VIDEO.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGsOqPDkIZY

the *MODEL* of mental health:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=zBEbfiaZTfc

"Look at the ANGLE OF THE KEY....see that, see that...."

what an idiot this Randi is.....a REAL CRITICAL THINKER....

Visit:

http://nostradamus-usa.netfirms.com

to see how we stopped the MILLION DOLLAR PARANORMAL challenge.....
watch carefully the consequences of Randi's *idea*.....
Show full article (1.52Kb)
no comments
  "Motion geometry"         


Author: mitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 15, 2008 21:55

Space geometry is defined by the null geodesic of light. Matter
travels with less velocity and does not follow this curve of space.
Instead it follows a steeper or a more magnified curve due to its
slower motion.

Throw things around and you will see motion geometry in action. Those
curved paths are not following actual space-time curvature but rather
a "motion geometry" extension of it.

Mitch Raemsch
3 Comments
  The two time continuums         


Author: mitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 15, 2008 20:29

The first is that it is spread out everywhere through space. Space is
not empty of time. space-time.

The other continuum aspect of time is duration that is divisable to
the infinitely small.

Mitch Raemsch; Two time continuums
no comments
  Mass and weight         


Author: mitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 15, 2008 19:53

Weight in gravity is how we measure mass,. But how do we define it?

Mass is the energy content of matter in motion. The equation is a
combination of the Gamma factor and E=-mc squared.

Mass in motion is Energy= Gamma MC^2

Mass = Energy divided by Gamma C squared

Mass in motion is infinitely dense energy concentrated in a point
particle.

Mass is infinitely dense point of Gamma energy. Gamma*C squared

Mitch Raemsch
no comments
  Observed Non-Relativistic R_H Value for Hydrogen Explained         


Author: Steve Bell
Date: May 15, 2008 18:54

From running these hydrogen simulations, I think I understand why the
observed value of hydrogen's Rydberg constant R_H is non-relativistic. All
of the relativistic effects are relatively minor, and even a small amount of
fracturing the electron's orbit will wash them out. The averaged out vales
of energy, angular momentum and radii still must adhere to the n*h_bar
quantization rule, and with the relativistic effects averaged out due to the
fractured chaotic motion of the electron in a shell, the shell a hydrogen
atom presents to the outside world is non-relativistic in signature. The
basic Dirac energy equation produces a prediction of energy and a
corresponding radius that is too small, and according to these simulations,
the QED effects that "relax" the base-Dirac binding energy do not nearly...
Show full article (2.22Kb)
no comments
  Dirk Van cannot understand the questions about object oriented simulation (OOS)         


Author: Jacobi
Date: May 15, 2008 13:21

Dirk Van insist to not understand the question about OOS in
this thread here

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/6bd9a9d9...#
1 Comment
  Is this universe a virtual reality simulation, or is real?         


Author: Jacobi
Date: May 15, 2008 12:33

The only way to go further and perpetuate is by
reproduction. The only elementary entity which
reproduces are viruses. These viruses evolves in
more sophisticated viruses called humans or also
intelligent aliens in UFOs from other planets.

Basically all life forms are viruses.

The only way to do make a virus, which reproduces,
is by engineering, which is programming. More
specific, by adding more sophisticated info to already
existing info.

According to many science and religions, gravity, EM,
matter and forces does not really exists, but are merely
artifacts based on other artifacts, which again, they are
nothing but raw info. This leads to the conclusion that
this universe must be a virtual reality simulation.

What other possibilities are there according to relativity?
5 Comments
Your Ad Here
  Is this Gaussian Integral calculation correct?         


Author: Jay R. Yablon
Date: May 15, 2008 10:36

In the file linked below, I have written out a particular calculation of
a Gaussian integral, and would like to know if (6) in this file is is
correct. (If link does not work, right click to download and then
open.)

http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/is-this-calculation-of-the-gaussian...

This is not rocket science nor is it particularly earthshaking. But, I
am having some conceptual trouble thinking about this integral (6) in
which the plane wave coefficient B=0, and would appreciate if someone
can help me straighten out my thinking about this.

Best regards,

Jay.
____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email: jyablon@nycap.rr.com
co-moderator: sci.physics.foundations
Weblog: http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/
Web Site: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm
8 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9