|
|
Up |
  |
Author: Basti05bBasti05b
Date: May 16, 2008 01:30
Dear Newsgroup:
The following news was on CBC on May 15,2008:
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/05/15/einstein-letter.html
{
Einstein letter dismissing God sells for
$330,000 US
Last Updated: Thursday, May 15, 2008 | 5:19 PM ET
CBC News
A letter written by Albert Einstein in which he dismissed belief in
God as a “product of human weaknesses” was auctioned off Thursday for
more than $330,000 US, destroying previous selling records of letters
by the renowned physicist.
The letter, written in German in 1954 to philosopher Eric Gutkind, was
sold in London, England, by Bloomsbury Auctions to a private
collector. It had initially been expected to fetch between $12,000 US
and $16,000 US.
“It beats the world record for an Einstein letter by about four
times," managing director Rupert Powell told the Guardian newspaper.
"It's a massive difference."
|
| Show full article (1.98Kb) |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Ken S. TuckerKen S. Tucker
Date: May 16, 2008 01:17
Hi fella's, I was hoping to further justify a
statement I posted. concerning Eq.(kst1) below...
On May 15, 1:19 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
> Where linearizing GR is concerned, I think it's possible.
> A brief and noisy discussion occurred late year in this
> SPF thread, regarding Orthogonality,
> "Flat/Curved SpaceTime."
>
> How we can understand *covariant and contravariant*
> geometric projections is depicted in Figure 1 in this link,
> I find, the linear expression of GR is formally expressed by,
>
> x_u x_u = x^u x^u , {u=0,1,2,3} , Eq.(kst1)
>
> with the summation convention applying and is generally
> true. The details are explained in "Flat/Curved SpaceTime",
> that were posted last year.
|
| Show full article (2.22Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: mitch.nicolas.raemschmitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 15, 2008 21:55
Space geometry is defined by the null geodesic of light. Matter
travels with less velocity and does not follow this curve of space.
Instead it follows a steeper or a more magnified curve due to its
slower motion.
Throw things around and you will see motion geometry in action. Those
curved paths are not following actual space-time curvature but rather
a "motion geometry" extension of it.
Mitch Raemsch
|
| |
|
3 Comments |
|
  |
Author: mitch.nicolas.raemschmitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 15, 2008 20:29
The first is that it is spread out everywhere through space. Space is
not empty of time. space-time.
The other continuum aspect of time is duration that is divisable to
the infinitely small.
Mitch Raemsch; Two time continuums
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: mitch.nicolas.raemschmitch.nicolas.raemsch
Date: May 15, 2008 19:53
Weight in gravity is how we measure mass,. But how do we define it?
Mass is the energy content of matter in motion. The equation is a
combination of the Gamma factor and E=-mc squared.
Mass in motion is Energy= Gamma MC^2
Mass = Energy divided by Gamma C squared
Mass in motion is infinitely dense energy concentrated in a point
particle.
Mass is infinitely dense point of Gamma energy. Gamma*C squared
Mitch Raemsch
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Steve BellSteve Bell
Date: May 15, 2008 18:54
From running these hydrogen simulations, I think I understand why the
observed value of hydrogen's Rydberg constant R_H is non-relativistic. All
of the relativistic effects are relatively minor, and even a small amount of
fracturing the electron's orbit will wash them out. The averaged out vales
of energy, angular momentum and radii still must adhere to the n*h_bar
quantization rule, and with the relativistic effects averaged out due to the
fractured chaotic motion of the electron in a shell, the shell a hydrogen
atom presents to the outside world is non-relativistic in signature. The
basic Dirac energy equation produces a prediction of energy and a
corresponding radius that is too small, and according to these simulations,
the QED effects that "relax" the base-Dirac binding energy do not nearly...
|
| Show full article (2.22Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: JacobiJacobi
Date: May 15, 2008 12:33
The only way to go further and perpetuate is by
reproduction. The only elementary entity which
reproduces are viruses. These viruses evolves in
more sophisticated viruses called humans or also
intelligent aliens in UFOs from other planets.
Basically all life forms are viruses.
The only way to do make a virus, which reproduces,
is by engineering, which is programming. More
specific, by adding more sophisticated info to already
existing info.
According to many science and religions, gravity, EM,
matter and forces does not really exists, but are merely
artifacts based on other artifacts, which again, they are
nothing but raw info. This leads to the conclusion that
this universe must be a virtual reality simulation.
What other possibilities are there according to relativity?
|
| |
|
5 Comments |
|
  |
|
  |
|
|
|
|
|