Author: Patrick CoillandPatrick Coilland Date: Jul 18, 2006 11:54
Frederick Umminger nous a récemment amicalement signifié :
>
> Let x = 0
>
> B(2) = B(0) - 2^-0 - B(0) - B(-1/3)
> B(2) = -1 - B(-1/3)
> B(2) = -1
>
> since B(y) = 0 if y is not an integer
>
Unfortunatly, OP did not accept this solution (first given by william
Elliot) :
This assumes that B(0) is defined, and that the definition is
consistent. This is a claim I did not intend to make
So, OP wants us to demonstrate that his definition is consistent (or
not).
This is the reason for which we all are interested in his demonstration
of (in)consistancy.
| 
