|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Vladimir BondarenkoVladimir Bondarenko Date: Mar 30, 2008 05:05
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Can Maple 11 calculate the TABLE integrals?
Enjoy yet another VM machine discovery.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mathematica 6.0.2
Integrate[1/z^2,{z,1,I Infinity}]
1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Derive 6.1
INT(1/z^2,z,1,#i*inf)
1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MuPAD 4.0.2
int(1/z^2, z = 1..I*infinity);
1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Now, what about Maplesoft, after 25+ years of Maple development?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Maple 11.02> int(1/z^2, z = 1..I*infinity);
|
| Show full article (1.32Kb) |
|
| | 10 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Vladimir BondarenkoVladimir Bondarenko Date: Mar 30, 2008 05:27
Maple 11.02> int(1/(1+z)^2, z = 0..I*infinity);
Maple 11.02> int(1/(1+z)^2, z = 1..I*infinity);
1
int(1/(1+z)^2,z = 1 .. infinity*I)
Enjoy!
On Mar 30, 5:05Â am, Vladimir Bondarenko cybertester.com> wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Can Maple 11 calculate the TABLE integrals?
>
> Enjoy yet another...
|
| Show full article (1.62Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: MateMate Date: Mar 30, 2008 06:59
On Mar 30, 3:27 pm, Vladimir Bondarenko cybertester.com> wrote:
> Maple 11.02> int(1/(1+z)^2, z = 0..I*infinity);
> Maple 11.02> int(1/(1+z)^2, z = 1..I*infinity);
>
> 1
> int(1/(1+z)^2,z = 1 .. infinity*I)
>
> Enjoy!
>
One must be very careful when using such "complex infinities".
It is much better to transform first the integral e.g. over
[0,infinity)
DERIVE simply computes INT(f,a,b) = F(b) - F(a) where F is an
antiderivative,
even if a,b are "infinities". Do you think that this is a so smart
approach?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Vladimir BondarenkoVladimir Bondarenko Date: Mar 30, 2008 07:25
I did expect a comment like yours (about the complex plane).
I agree. In this respect, Derive's approach is (too) simplistic.
But what you'd say about Mathematica 6 and MuPAD 4?
|
| Show full article (0.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Vladimir BondarenkoVladimir Bondarenko Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:19
...................................................
Just a remark on the ubiqiutous Maple bugs...
# Jacques Carette, Mar 24, 2008
Maple 11.02> assume(z>0);
Maple 11.02> is(sin(z)^2+cos(z)^2*z^2 > 0);
false (!) # Maple bugs strike again!
...................................................
So, what you'd say about Mathematica 6 and MuPAD 4?
...................................................
> On Mar 30, 6:59 am, Mate wrote:
On Mar 30, 7:25Â am, Vladimir Bondarenko cybertester.com> wrote:
> I did expect a comment like yours (about the complex plane).
>
> I agree. In this respect, Derive's approach is (too) simplistic...
|
| Show full article (1.42Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Vladimir BondarenkoVladimir Bondarenko Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:29
...........................................
Just yet another ubiqiutous Maple 11 bug...
# Axel Vogt, Mar 28, 2008
Maple 11.02> Ei(1,1):
Maple 11.02> evalf(%%=convert(%%,Sum));
.2193839344 = 1.
# Maple bugs strike again!
...........................................
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Date: Mar 31, 2008 02:18
Vladimir Bondarenko wrote:
> ...........................................
>
> Just yet another ubiqiutous Maple 11 bug...
>
> # Axel Vogt, Mar 28, 2008
>
> Maple 11.02> Ei(1,1):
> Maple 11.02> evalf(%%=convert(%%,Sum));
>
> .2193839344 = 1.
>
> # Maple bugs strike again!
>
> ...........................................
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: David W. CantrellDavid W. Cantrell Date: Apr 2, 2008 17:36
Vladimir Bondarenko cybertester.com> wrote:
> I did expect a comment like yours (about the complex plane).
>
> I agree. In this respect, Derive's approach is (too) simplistic.
I must say that I don't agree. It seems to me that Derive's approach here
is theoretically correct and as simple as possible.
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|