A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.math.symbolic only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

sci.math.symbolic Profile…
 Up
A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Author: 2
Date: May 11, 2008 11:03

Hi,

Please forgove the spellig, I am forig. I amm posting anonymously. Maple is
very expensive to purchase. What is the
best way to get a pirate copy?

Anltativley, do you please know os a frre maple webserver that I can access
anonumously?

Please don't email my fake email address it will get bounce. The best whay
for you to replay is from a similar fake email account. Please remember that
I am nimber 2. Thank you.

2
43 Comments
Re: A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Author: Dave
Date: May 11, 2008 11:25

2 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please forgove the spellig, I am forig. I amm posting anonymously. Maple is
> very expensive to purchase. What is the
> best way to get a pirate copy?
>
> Anltativley, do you please know os a frre maple webserver that I can access
> anonumously?
>
> Please don't email my fake email address it will get bounce. The best whay
> for you to replay is from a similar fake email account. Please remember that
> I am nimber 2. Thank you.
>
> 2
>
>

Sage 3.0.1 was released a few days ago

http://www.sagemath.org/
Show full article (0.95Kb)
no comments
Re: A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Author: Martin Rubey
Date: May 11, 2008 12:13

"2" anon.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Please forgove the spellig, I am forig. I amm posting anonymously. Maple is
> very expensive to purchase. What is the
> best way to get a pirate copy?

Unless you are required by your teacher to use maple (in which case I think
using a pirate copy is somewhat legitmate), I'd advise you to check out one of
the many free alternatives. Many of them are even better than their commercial
counterparts *in certain areas*.

There is a list of free computer algebra systems here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_computer_algebra_systems

I personally use (and develop for) FriCAS / Axiom. SAGE has already been
mentioned, Maxima is also well known. As far as I know the others are more
specialised. (Please correct me if I'm mistaken.)

Hope this helps,

Martin
no comments
Re: A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Author: 2
Date: May 11, 2008 12:26

"Dave" coo.com> wrote in message news:48273a06@212.67.96.135...
[snip]
> Sage 3.0.1 was released a few days ago
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/
>
> Why not try that, rather than asking for a pirate copy of Maple? It is
> legally free. If you have $10, you can buy a book on it from Amazon
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Sage-Tutorial-www-sagemath-org-William-Stein/dp/1438214197/ref...
>
> There is an online Sage notebook at
>
> https://www.sagenb.org/
>
> you need to sign up for an account, but it is free.

Thank you Dave. Let me explain, more. I am interested in doing symbolic math
that is verifiable and with least effort on my part. I learned Maple in a
one semester 900 level graduate course. That took...
Show full article (1.74Kb)
no comments
Re: A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Author: Vladimir Bondarenko
Date: May 11, 2008 12:43

As far as I understand, right now Sage is (much) weaker than Maple or
Mathematica.

On May 11, 12:26 pm, "2" anon.com> wrote:
> "Dave" coo.com> wrote in messagenews:48273a06@212.67.96.135...
>
> [snip]
>
>> Sage 3.0.1 was released a few days ago
>
Show full article (1.86Kb)
no comments
Re: A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Date: May 11, 2008 13:20

2 wrote:
> "Dave" coo.com> wrote in message news:48273a06@212.67.96.135...
> [snip]
>> Sage 3.0.1 was released a few days ago
>>
>> http://www.sagemath.org/
>>
>> Why not try that, rather than asking for a pirate copy of Maple? It is
>> legally free. If you have $10, you can buy a book on it from Amazon
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/Sage-Tutorial-www-sagemath-org-William-Stein/dp/1438214197/ref...
>>
>> There is an online Sage notebook at
>>
>> https://www.sagenb.org/
>>
>> you need to sign up for an account, but it is free.
>
> Thank you Dave. Let me explain, more. I am interested in doing symbolic math
> that is verifiable and with least effort on my part. I learned Maple in a ...
Show full article (2.17Kb)
no comments
Re: A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Author: 2
Date: May 11, 2008 14:07

"Axel Vogt" <&noreply@axelvogt.de> wrote
>> If I accepted the results as verified then I would need to put in another
>> great amount of effort into writing a second theoretical paper to be
>> submitted to an international nuclear journal to determine if that
>> international journal considered Sage to be verified.
> Additionally it may be a bit strange if being asked to
> provide a Maple sheet for your work ...

In my experience, being asked for a Maple sheet does not occur. Reviewers
use whatever symbolic math program they like best, Maple, Mathematica or
what ever, for verification. The submitter never knows...
Show full article (2.16Kb)
no comments
Re: A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Author: YBM
Date: May 11, 2008 14:50

2 wrote:
> In my experience, it is best to follow submission guidelines and
> submit the manuscript in the lingua franca of scientific journals, a
> Microsoft Word document.

Are you kidding ?
no comments
Re: A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Author: Henry Poincare
Date: May 11, 2008 15:11

On Sun, 11 May 2008 21:07:59 +0000, 2 wrote:
> In my experience, it is
> best to follow submission guidelines and submit the manuscript in the
> lingua franca of scientific journals, a Microsoft Word document
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Lo and behold, here's the third "village idiot" we've got here. Is that a
world record?
no comments
Re: A free copy of Maple or a frre maple webservre         


Author: 2
Date: May 11, 2008 15:15

"YBM" wrote
>2 wrote:
>> In my experience, it is best to follow submission guidelines and submit
>> the manuscript in the lingua franca of scientific journals, a Microsoft
>> Word document.
>
> Are you kidding ?

Gee, if you found only one thing objectionable in what I just wrote, I guess
I'm not doing badly. I take that as validation of all else that I wrote.

2
no comments
1 2 3 4 5