|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: 22 Date: May 11, 2008 11:03
Hi,
Please forgove the spellig, I am forig. I amm posting anonymously. Maple is
very expensive to purchase. What is the
best way to get a pirate copy?
Anltativley, do you please know os a frre maple webserver that I can access
anonumously?
Please don't email my fake email address it will get bounce. The best whay
for you to replay is from a similar fake email account. Please remember that
I am nimber 2. Thank you.
2
|
| |
|
| | 43 Comments |
|
  |
Author: DaveDave Date: May 11, 2008 11:25
2 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please forgove the spellig, I am forig. I amm posting anonymously. Maple is
> very expensive to purchase. What is the
> best way to get a pirate copy?
>
> Anltativley, do you please know os a frre maple webserver that I can access
> anonumously?
>
> Please don't email my fake email address it will get bounce. The best whay
> for you to replay is from a similar fake email account. Please remember that
> I am nimber 2. Thank you.
>
> 2
>
>
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Martin RubeyMartin Rubey Date: May 11, 2008 12:13
"2" anon.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Please forgove the spellig, I am forig. I amm posting anonymously. Maple is
> very expensive to purchase. What is the
> best way to get a pirate copy?
Unless you are required by your teacher to use maple (in which case I think
using a pirate copy is somewhat legitmate), I'd advise you to check out one of
the many free alternatives. Many of them are even better than their commercial
counterparts *in certain areas*.
There is a list of free computer algebra systems here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_computer_algebra_systems
I personally use (and develop for) FriCAS / Axiom. SAGE has already been
mentioned, Maxima is also well known. As far as I know the others are more
specialised. (Please correct me if I'm mistaken.)
Hope this helps,
Martin
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: 22 Date: May 11, 2008 12:26
"Dave" coo.com> wrote in message news:48273a06@212.67.96.135...
[snip]
Thank you Dave. Let me explain, more. I am interested in doing symbolic math
that is verifiable and with least effort on my part. I learned Maple in a
one semester 900 level graduate course. That took...
|
| Show full article (1.74Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Vladimir BondarenkoVladimir Bondarenko Date: May 11, 2008 12:43
As far as I understand, right now Sage is (much) weaker than Maple or
Mathematica.
On May 11, 12:26Â pm, "2" anon.com> wrote:
> "Dave" coo.com> wrote in messagenews:48273a06@212.67.96.135...
>
> [snip]
>
>> Sage 3.0.1 was released a few days ago
>
|
| Show full article (1.86Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Date: May 11, 2008 13:20
2 wrote:
> "Dave" coo.com> wrote in message news:48273a06@212.67.96.135...
> [snip]
>
> Thank you Dave. Let me explain, more. I am interested in doing symbolic math
> that is verifiable and with least effort on my part. I learned Maple in a ...
|
| Show full article (2.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: 22 Date: May 11, 2008 14:07
"Axel Vogt" <&noreply@axelvogt.de> wrote
>> If I accepted the results as verified then I would need to put in another
>> great amount of effort into writing a second theoretical paper to be
>> submitted to an international nuclear journal to determine if that
>> international journal considered Sage to be verified.
> Additionally it may be a bit strange if being asked to
> provide a Maple sheet for your work ...
In my experience, being asked for a Maple sheet does not occur. Reviewers
use whatever symbolic math program they like best, Maple, Mathematica or
what ever, for verification. The submitter never knows...
|
| Show full article (2.16Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: YBMYBM Date: May 11, 2008 14:50
2 wrote:
> In my experience, it is best to follow submission guidelines and
> submit the manuscript in the lingua franca of scientific journals, a
> Microsoft Word document.
Are you kidding ?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Henry PoincareHenry Poincare Date: May 11, 2008 15:11
On Sun, 11 May 2008 21:07:59 +0000, 2 wrote:
> In my experience, it is
> best to follow submission guidelines and submit the manuscript in the
> lingua franca of scientific journals, a Microsoft Word document
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Lo and behold, here's the third "village idiot" we've got here. Is that a
world record?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: 22 Date: May 11, 2008 15:15
"YBM" wrote
>2 wrote:
>> In my experience, it is best to follow submission guidelines and submit
>> the manuscript in the lingua franca of scientific journals, a Microsoft
>> Word document.
>
> Are you kidding ?
Gee, if you found only one thing objectionable in what I just wrote, I guess
I'm not doing badly. I take that as validation of all else that I wrote.
2
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|