sci.math.symbolic
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.math.symbolic only
 
Advanced search
January 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 1
78910111213 2
14151617181920 3
21222324252627 4
28293031    5
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.math.symbolic Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Mathematica 6 running on a Sun Ultra 24 Workstation with Solaris 10 8/07 installed.         


Author: EdwardOCallaghan
Date: Jan 31, 2008 22:20

Hello everyone,

In regards to the issue highlighted here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math.symbolic/browse_thread/thread/4a8acbd97b1edbc1/c5da6ef9cc8c0f8f...#c5da6ef9cc8c0f8f

I would like to ask the status of Mathematica running on a Sun Ultra
24 ( Intel ) workstation running Solaris 10 8/07 or nv b81 ( see
www.opensolaris.org )?

As I am now starting my second year studies and would like to buy a
Ultra 24 and a student copy of Mathematica 6.

Solaris is my main desktop environment for both development and school
work, I do not use Linux for these tasks nor would I be willing to
even touch Windows with gloves on.

I hope some one from Wolfram could shed some light on this topic?

Thanks for your time,
Edward O'Callaghan.
no comments
  Peter Pein discovers a Wolfram Research QA process defect: Bug in Mathematica 6 - Integrate - 73 (Sqrt, unevaluated, multiple regression bug) - BUG THE LONG LIVER: 1996-2008 (!)         


Author: Vladimir Bondarenko
Date: Jan 31, 2008 16:05

Today, trying to handle the integral crashing Mathematica,

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math.symbolic/msg/5e79f0e64e6ef73b

Peter Pein comes up with a nice solution

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math.symbolic/msg/01e7a861262a4ccd

However, it turns out his solution works only for a subset of
Mathematica versions (please find the details below).

Bravo, Peter!!

-----------------------------------------------------------------

If the same bugs exists through numerous software releases,
I think that is valuable public information.

It just should not happen.

-- Brad Cooper

-----------------------------------------------------------------
- NOT FIXED BUGS ARE DANGEROUS: THEY TEND TO GET MORE SEVERE -
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Quality of CASs is our #1 care.

So our little demo continues.... Hello again from the VM machine
which hopefully soon will not be ignored by CAS manufacturers.
Show full article (2.54Kb)
no comments
  Bug in Mathematica 6 - Integrate - 72 (Sqrt, unevaluated, regression bug)         


Author: Vladimir Bondarenko
Date: Jan 31, 2008 08:32

-----------------------------------------------------------------
-- NOT FIXED BUGS ARE DANGEROUS: THEY TEND TO GET MORE SEVERE --
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Quality of CASs is our #1 care.

So our little demo continues.... Hello again from the VM machine
which hopefully soon will not be ignored by CAS manufacturers.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

NIntegrate[Sqrt[1 - z] Sqrt[1 + z^2], {z, -1, 1}]

2.14926

-----------------------------------------------------------------

N[Integrate[Sqrt[1-z] Sqrt[1+z^2], {z, -1, 1}]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------
VERSION OUTPUT RESOLUTION
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Mathematica 6.0 Unevaluated integral <-------------------- BUG

Mathematica 5.2 2.14926 OK

Mathematica 4.2 2.14926 OK

Mathematica 3.0 2.14926 OK

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Show full article (1.63Kb)
2 Comments
  Re: An exact 1-D integration challenge - 50 - Earthling, go and defeat all the silly CASs!         


Author: Mate
Date: Jan 31, 2008 05:43

On Jan 31, 2:40 pm, Vladimir Bondarenko cybertester.com> wrote:
>
> int(sqrt(1-sqrt(1-z^2))*sqrt(1-z), z= -1..1);
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

simplify(student[changevar](z=cos(t),%%,t));

1/2*2^(1/2)
3 Comments
  Re: An exact 1-D integration challenge - 50 - Earthling, go and defeat all the silly CASs!         


Author: sashap
Date: Jan 31, 2008 04:54

On Jan 31, 6:40 am, Vladimir Bondarenko cybertester.com> wrote:
>
> Can one design the CAS
> steps to obtain the divine exact value of
>
> int(sqrt(1-sqrt(1-z^2))*sqrt(1-z), z= -1..1);
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vladimir Bondarenko
>

In[1]:= (FullSimplify[#1, -Pi/2 < t < Pi/2] & )[
Sqrt[1 - Sqrt[1 - z^2]]*Sqrt[1 - z]*Dt[z] /. z -> Sin[t]]

Out[1]= Cos[t] Dt[t] Sqrt[(-1 + Cos[t]) (-1 + Sin[t])]

In[2]:= Integrate[%% /. Dt[t] -> 1, {t, -Pi/2, Pi/2}]

Out[2]= 1/Sqrt[2]

Oleksandr
no comments
  Wolfram Research QA process defect: Bug in Mathematica 6 - N - 14 (MeijerG, infinite loop?, regression bug) - BUG THE LONG LIVER: 2004-2008         


Author: Vladimir Bondarenko
Date: Jan 30, 2008 03:17

(***************************************************************)

If the same bugs exists through numerous software releases,
I think that is valuable public information.

It just should not happen.

-- Brad Cooper

(***************************************************************)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
-- NOT FIXED BUGS ARE DANGEROUS: THEY TEND TO GET MORE SEVERE --
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Quality of CASs is our #1 care.

So our little demo continues.... Hello again from the VM machine
which hopefully soon will not be ignored by CAS manufacturers.

This example demonstrates YET ANOTHER case of bad defects in the
Wolfram Research Quality Assurance process. Consider, it cannot
trap and fix efficiently bugs the long livers.

The reported here defect persists in Mathematica versions since
2002 to 2008.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

N[(Sqrt[32] - 16)/3]
Show full article (2.21Kb)
no comments
  An exact simplification challenge - 50 (MeijerG) - Victorious Earthling, go and beat all the moronic CASs!         


Author: Vladimir Bondarenko
Date: Jan 29, 2008 23:40

Hello computer algebra buffs the Earthlings,

Alert! Wake up!

The human race is in danger! The cruel Computers are coming!
Go and show your full superiority over the cold stupid chips!
Peace, labor, May, friendship, chewing gum, positive! Let
give 'em the ultimate battle! And remember,

Train hard, fight easy. -- Field Marshal Alexander Suvorov

http://100megsfree4.com/rusgeneral/suvorov.htm

So 'bout the training. Is there (is!) a Brave Human Warrior
the Simplifier to invent the CAS steps to "elementarize" this

MeijerG([[1], [3/4, 5/4]],[[1, 1/2, -1/2], []],-1)

?
Best wishes,

Vladimir Bondarenko

VM and GEMM architect
Co-founder, CEO, Mathematical Director

http://www.cybertester.com/ Cyber Tester, LLC
http://maple.bug-list.org/ Maple Bugs Encyclopaedia
http://www.CAS-testing.org/ CAS Testing
Show full article (1.07Kb)
1 Comment
  An exact simplification challenge - 49 (MeijerG) - go and surpass all the CASs!         


Author: Vladimir Bondarenko
Date: Jan 29, 2008 13:22

Hello computer algebra buffs,

Your guesswork is right, again! All the modern computer algebra
systems fail to simplify this directly...

Is there a Brave Human Simplifier to come up with the steps to
"elementarize" (and squeeze much!) this specfunction nightmare

+ MeijerG([[1], [5/4, 3/2]], [[3/4, 3/4, 1/4], []], -1)
- MeijerG([[1], [1/2, 3/4]], [[1/4, 1/4, -1/4], []], -1)

?
Best wishes,

Vladimir Bondarenko

VM and GEMM architect
Co-founder, CEO, Mathematical Director

http://www.cybertester.com/ Cyber Tester, LLC
http://maple.bug-list.org/ Maple Bugs Encyclopaedia
http://www.CAS-testing.org/ CAS Testing
1 Comment
  An exact simplification challenge - 49 (MeijerG) - go and surpass all the CASs!         


Author: Vladimir Bondarenko
Date: Jan 29, 2008 10:47

Hello computer algebra aficinados,

Your guesswork is right, again! All the modern computer algebra
systems fail to simplify this directly...

Is there a Brave Human Simplifier to come up with the steps to
"elementarize" (and squeeze much!) this specfunction nightmare

+ MeijerG([[1], [5/4, 3/2]], [[3/4, 3/4, 1/4], []], -1)
- MeijerG([[1], [1/2, 3/4]], [[1/4, 1/4, -1/4], []], -1)

?
Best wishes,

Vladimir Bondarenko

VM and GEMM architect
Co-founder, CEO, Mathematical Director

http://www.cybertester.com/ Cyber Tester, LLC
http://maple.bug-list.org/ Maple Bugs Encyclopaedia
http://www.CAS-testing.org/ CAS Testing

ORIGIN:
Show full article (0.85Kb)
no comments
  Wolfram Research QA process defect: Bug in Mathematica 6 - Integrate - 71 (Sqrt, invalid value, regression bug) - BUG THE LONG LIVER: 2002-2008         


Author: Vladimir Bondarenko
Date: Jan 29, 2008 09:34

(***************************************************************)

If the same bugs exists through numerous software releases,
I think that is valuable public information.

It just should not happen.

-- Brad Cooper

(***************************************************************)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
- NOT FIXED BUGS ARE DANGEROUS: THEY TEND TO GET MORE SEVERE -
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Quality of CASs is our #1 care.

So our little demo continues.... Hello again from the VM machine
which hopefully soon will not be ignored by CAS manufacturers.

This example demonstrates YET ANOTHER case of bad defects in the
Wolfram Research Quality Assurance process. Consider, it cannot
trap and fix efficiently bugs the long livers.

The reported here defect persists in ALL Mathematica versions
since at least 2002 to 2008.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

NIntegrate[Sqrt[1 - z] Sqrt[Sqrt[1 + z^2]], {z, -1, 1}]
Show full article (2.20Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9