sci.math.symbolic
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.math.symbolic only
 
Advanced search
May 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
   1234 18
567891011 19
12131415161718 20
19202122232425 21
262728293031  22
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.math.symbolic Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Symbolic programming for dummies         


Author: Francogrex
Date: May 6, 2008 11:05

Hi, I would like to try out symbolic programming. I know maple,
mathematica and others are computer algebra system that let you do
that, but they are not primitive languages. I would like to write and
run a very simple program [something like expanding (x^2 + 3)^2/(x)]
but written in a language like C or C++ or other. Do you know which is
the best and easiest programming language for symbolic computation?
And is there like a book which teaches symbolic math programming (I
know there are books who present general algorithms like the book of
Symbolic Integration by Bronstein, but this is of little use to me
now, because it's not fully practical, I need something like symbolic
programming for dummies with all details). Thanks
7 Comments
  A Riccati differential equation         


Author: Basti05b
Date: May 6, 2008 02:37

Dear Newsgroup:

http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1738753&tstart=0

As I have mentioned before once a polynomial is solved in a class, it
has variety of applications, such as solving Riccati.

The following is a Riccati differential equation where, M(t),N(t) and
R(t) are arbitrary functions derived from the polynomial of degree
110, posted before on this topic

I have its general solution, without any integrals present.

Start substituting variety of values to its functions to see what
Maple presents the solution (like M(t)=t+1,N(t)=1/
(t^2-1),R(t)=3*t^4,and many more).

I will enclose its Maple input on file t1.

This is a member of a class, so, I have thousands like this in each
class, depending on computer memory and speed.

In some cases many solutions of Maple in terms of integrals and
hypergeometric functions will be solved, simply because I have its
general solution (of DE).

Those who think that I have no new ideas! , behave, as if stupidity
were a virtue.
Show full article (1.11Kb)
5 Comments