Sir,I'm a student of computer science and engineering.But I'm badly
interested in maths.Recently,I've gone through a rather preliminary
course on linear algebrae.Mostly i studied from G.Strang Linear
Algebrae.A small introduction on Game Theory was included which was
very interesting.I would love to study more abut this theory.
So I request your kind help by providing me the name of books(if
possible please mail me a few ebooks)
and other important tips(like what are the prerequisites for studying
Game theory)

Upon reading this, I asked myself, How much does it cost
to develop Mathematica 6? :)

Any comments?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=134989

Leslie Benzies, producer of Grand Theft Auto IV, has estimated the
game cost Rockstar around USD 100 million to create.

Speaking to The Times Online Benzies said more than 1000 people worked
on the game during its three-and-a-half year development.

He said he didn't know the final cost of development for sure, but put
his guess at USD 100 million.

If we ALL ignore the moron, perhaps he just might go away.

I know its tempting to make fun of him (I've done it myself), but it
only encourages him.

I've set the followup to /dev/null, so don't bother replying to this.
Just ignore him, and hope he goes away. Let him reply to his own posts,
then to his own replies.

Dear Newsgroup:

Let me ask you the following question:

“
Why, you think they are promoting Fermat Last Theorem and ignoring my research on New Math?

Difficult question, I suppose. “

Both of us, A. Wiles and myself graduated from the same department (Pure math at Cambridge) and the same year.

One pursued after Ph.D. degree, a conventional mathematics within the mainstream research, and the other one wanted to revolutionize classical mathematics not done since more than a century.

One has his work purely abstract proofs; the other one left those kinds of ideas and concentrated with solving issues.

So, what do you think the math community is really thinking?

What are the main distinctions between our research goals?

What are the implications of both results from social, political as well as academic issues?

What Cambridge University really thinking about these issues?

Bearing in mind the long history of Cambridge in science.

Although you already may have known about my articles on FLT on sci.math.newsgroup.

Dr.M.Basti

Hello computer algebra Buff the Earthling,

The Ultimate Battlefield is already almost in sight!

Defenestrate the crackpot, don't waste your precious time to the
bunk; instead, get involved into some of absolute value, that is
protection of our libery and eatables!

Be like the victorious Field Marshal Suvorov,

T r a i n h a r d, f i g h t e a s y!

Use your bean, don't let your resourceful little gray cells to
rust and slowdown, thus being critically vulnerable before the
formidable danger of eerie (striped!) Computers coming!

So, is there a Desperado Warrior the Simplifier to devise a set
of CAS commands to dwarf the sqrt/ln behemoth below my signature

?
Best wishes,

Vladimir Bondarenko

VM and GEMM architect
Co-founder, CEO, Mathematical Director

Dear Newsgroup:

I see many articles of Osher Doctorow on sci physics (and sometimes on sci. physics relativity) about Riccati equations (as well as old articles).

He has recently posted an article about special relativity versus Riccati equations (in sci physics).

These types of comparison are interesting from My NEW ENERGY FORMULA point of view.

Once you get to know my lecture notes, you will be entered into a new world of commutations (as vast as the universe itself!).

You need to eventually gain personal experiences about this new world, and my explanations will not be sufficient unless you have engaged in this research for many years (may be 5 at least).

This is because you need to search for new avenues and confirm my convergence formula on Riccati.

I am sure you will confirm my key formula for the universe as well as energy.

So, we will be eventually going to compare the physics formula of energy

E = m c^2

With the purely abstract mathematical one i.e.Riccati

dx/dt + x^2 = g(t)

Naturally similar questions as Osher Doctorow raised, will be surfaced into the domain of our debate.

Whether totally different and new experimentations will be necessary for special relativity, remains open.

So, do not get too uncomfortable about my scientific inquires, since we need to answer questions as they happen in the world of science (the new Math is a science since it has all the general characteristics of any science as Henry Poincare noted).

Dr.M.Basti

شكرا على الفيلم.

Dear Newsgroup:

I am sure many would like to see how my claims of new math are all
about.

I am interested to present several seminars about Riccati differential
equations and polynomials (new methods and applications).

I can present only its basic ideas and may provide you with some of my
programming on solving polynomials and other materials (in a diskette
available for purchase).

There will also be a chance to chat over my key mathematical formula
of the universe or my new energy formula.

Well, please provide ideas, how this can be done.

Whether seminar (s) can be conducted in a research institution,
university or many other places (commercial or not). In the U.S.A. or
outside

And who will host the seminar (s).

Thanks

Dr.Mehran Basti

Dear Newsgroup:

Have you tried to see how you could handle this polynomial from Galois theory point of view?

Do you know that it took me generally 16 years that I found out the polynomials LIKE THE ABOVE ONE are based on Riccati as a class?

This is as strong as what Fermat did to set up:

(f(x+h) - f(x))/h

The next operation was what Newton did and let h approaches zero.
(i.e. the invention of Calculus).

Now polynomials are embedded in Riccati and we have a new world of mathematics as strong as Calculus and analytic geometry.
(I believe it is many times more).

The silence of the math community will not diminish this new way of computations, just delay its marketability.

Dr.M.Basti