sci.math.research
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.math.research only
 
Advanced search
July 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 27
78910111213 28
14151617181920 29
21222324252627 30
28293031    31
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.math.research Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Question about motives (motifs) and the Weil and Grothendieck conjectures         


Author: Deacon John
Date: Jul 2, 2008 06:00

All,

Grothendieck claimed that his "standard conjectures" imply the Weil
conjectures. He showed the proof to a class that he taught one summer
in the 1960's and he asked one of his students, Kleiman, to write it
up and publish it. Kleiman did just that an dpublished it in 1968.

I'm having trouble understanding how the standard conjectures imply
the Weil conjectures. Can anybody help me out here?

(Notes for students: 1) That's Alexander Grothendieck and Andre Weil.
Weil is pronounced like as if it was spelled "vay" and rhymied with
"way." 2) If you don't have a clue what I'm talking about and you
would like to, here's the wikipedia page. Wikipedia also has excellent
pages on "motifs" or "motives" that I mention further down.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standar...gebraic_cycles

All the literature I've been able to find refers to Kleiman's original
1968 paper "for the details" and as far as I can tell, none of the
literature I've found so far even gives a hint as to how one might do
such a derivation.
Show full article (4.70Kb)
3 Comments