sci.logic
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.logic only
 
Advanced search
January 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 1
78910111213 2
14151617181920 3
21222324252627 4
28293031    5
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.logic Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re :The empty set         


Author: apoorv
Date: Jan 12, 2008 10:20

This is a continuation of my earlier post on the subject;
the earlier thread having gone cold,hence this new thread.

Since the set Z: Ax(x e Z) does not exist ,

The following equivalence holds in ZFC

AZ[Z e 0
--> Ax(x e Z)]

So, could we say that:

0 is the set containing the set of all sets '?
-apoorv
44 Comments
  The insanity of arguing for Islam         


Author: plenty900
Date: Jan 12, 2008 06:56

Recently in a discussion, I was accused of only
considering what critics of Islam have to say about it,
which is always negative.

So I said, OK, tell me which of these sources
I should listen to, to meet your high standards:

1. Ex-Muslims who have a biased view of Islam
because they were treated like crap.
2. Muslims who have a biased view of Islam
because they are being treated like slaves
but they like that.
3. Muslim scholars who have a biased view
because it's their livelihood.
4. Non-Muslim theists who pretend Islam is
OK because they hate secular society & atheists.

I said, who can you trust if not the critics?
Show full article (1.35Kb)
9 Comments
  The law of action: how described in the Vedas         


Author: Akash
Date: Jan 12, 2008 03:24

There can be no action without a purpose or cause; and its result is
for the sake of purusha or the soul. There can only be one action at
a time; and actions may be divided into main and subsidiary ones. We
have to express all this in language; and it can be done in various
ways.

Result of action: Let us consider the characteristic marks of effect
or the results of action. This effect or result is meant for the sake
of something else; and Badari says that it is for the purpose of
acquiring some object, or wealth, or attribute, or purifying one's
self. Jaimini says that it consists in action to, for that may be the
result of our aim.

A further study on this aspect maybe read at:

http://www.narachphilosophy.com/the_law_of_action_how_described_in_the_vedas.htm

(You may click on the link above or type the complete URL address into
your browser)
no comments
  Final call for papers         


Author: john
Date: Jan 12, 2008 02:00

Final call for papers
The 2008 MULTICONF (website: www.PromoteResearch.org ) will be held
during July 7-10 2008 in Orlando, FL, USA. We invite draft paper
submissions and the deadline for paper submission is very close. The
event consists of the following conferences.
* International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Pattern
Recognition (AIPR-08)
* International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Control Systems
(ARCS-08)
* International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology,
Genomics and Chemoinformatics (BCBGC-08)
* International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems and Web
Technologies (EISWT-08)
* International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking
and Communication Systems (HPCNCS-08)
* International Conference on Software Engineering Theory...
Show full article (0.99Kb)
no comments
  Re: The law of action: need of knowledge: action and time         


Author: THE BORG
Date: Jan 12, 2008 00:52

"Akash" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b4ea9576-6c1d-44e3-9b8d-ce70475ce3a4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> So long as there is life, there must be action. We can understand
> this if we fix the meaning of words according to the Krama or method
> of reciting the text. The sacred books also tell us that action must
> cease; and we must understand what this really means. There are a
> variety of actions, but there can be only one action at a time.
> Action does not consist in a name; the law of one action at a time
> applies to all kinds of action; but it is the best action that can be
> performed at the time.
>
> It is necessary to have knowledge to understand the law of Dharma; and
> we can understand it if we interpret the text correctly. In certain
> cases, however, it is easy to understand the whole idea. Certain
> actions are more important than others; but the most important thing
> in this connection is Chitta or intellect, because it is its special
> function to decide.
>
> A further elaboration on the subject maybe read at:
> ...
Show full article (1.70Kb)
no comments