sci.energy.hydrogen
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.energy.hydrogen only
 
Advanced search
February 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 5
45678910 6
11121314151617 7
18192021222324 8
2526272829   9
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.energy.hydrogen Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

 Up
  Spook News         


Author: knews4u2chew
Date: Feb 12, 2008 21:24

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/how-the-spooks-took-over-%%20the-news-780672...

How the spooks took over the news

In his controversial new book, Nick Davies argues that shadowy
intelligence agencies are pumping out black propaganda to manipulate
public opinion - and that the media simply swallow it wholesale
Related Articles

* Kamal Ahmed: 'Nick is a coward'. Ahmed bites back

* Print Print
* Email Email

Search Search Go
Independent.co.uk Web
Bookmark & Share

* Digg It
* del.icio.us
* Facebook
* Stumbleupon

What are these?
Change font size: A | A | A

Monday, 11 February 2008
Show full article (1.85Kb)
13 Comments
  Using agricultural "waste" to make biofuels may not be such a good idea!         


Author: calderhome
Date: Feb 12, 2008 16:08

Using agricultural "waste" to make biofuels has problems. Removing
crop waste increases the need for nitrogen fertilizers, which release
the most potent greenhouse gas of all, nitrous oxide, which is 296
times more effective at trapping the earth's heat than carbon
dioxide. Much of the residual crop biomass must be returned to the
soil to maintain topsoil integrity, otherwise the rate of topsoil
erosion will increase dramatically. If we mine our topsoil for
energy, we may end up committing slow agricultural suicide, just as
the Mayan Empire once did. Without topsoil, the world starves!

Mayan Empire story - http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/15nov_maya.htm

Secondly, the only publicly proven method of making ethanol from
cellulose costs the equivalent of making gasoline from crude oil that
costs $305. a barrel. Various companies have made claims they can do
it cheaper, but there are excatly ZERO production plants in the world
making ethanol from lignocellulose. Making small amounts in a lab is
different than a full scale commercial operation. Remember cold
fusion? If we can ever make ethanol from true garbage, then that is a
great idea, but we must not destroy our precious topsoil, or speed
global warming while doing it.
Show full article (1.37Kb)
4 Comments