|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 20, 2008 22:53
The Unbearable Frightfulness of Linger-ing, ye mammering canker, I think
ye be transformed into a beast; for I can nowhere find like thee a man,
ye sickened:
> On Jul 20, 7:00 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Not a problem for me, mate. Mine is already off, sitting in a pickle jar
>> of
>> formaldehyde.
> Precious. Both you AND Jefferey Dahmer's. Great. How comforting of a
> visual for all of us....
It also happens to be true that I have no dick, that I am dickless.
>
> S*Babykins
So, slutguts, why do you have problems with facts?
|
| Show full article (0.85Kb) |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 20, 2008 19:16
Kadaitcha Man, ye monotonic inbreed, thou art lumpish, heavy,
melancholy, ye quacked:
> You have a dick
I have no dick. I am dickless. Since you like to follow in my footsteps like
a lost, unloved puppy dog, JakTheFlubber, you too must be dickless.
Oh, the irony.
--
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 20, 2008 13:29
To someone with bogus invention like this one. There is no specific mention of material used in his electrolysis. I bet the patent office doesn't have an engineer to verify whether or not the invention is working. For example like the flaw, it's related to the problem that Coast to Coast tester mentionned earlier last week, he was having problem with Oxygen Sensor and "Engine light came on."
-------
The operation of the vehicle's oxygen sensor needs to be adjusted to take into account the additional
oxygen that is added to the fuel system from the electrolyzer. Normally, if the oxygen sensor senses more oxygen, the vehicle's computer would determine that the engine is running lean and open up the fuel injectors to a richer fuel mixture. This is
undesirable and would cause poor fuel economy:
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7191737/fulltext.html
|
| |
|
11 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 20, 2008 05:44
RHF, ye urchin-snouted issue of a mangy dog, a pox damn you, you muddy
rascal, is that all the comfort you bring me?, ye dissented:
> Since this is a Shortwave Radio Foru
You seem to have mistaken me for some cunt who might care.
--
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 20, 2008 05:08
"virig" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bab4380c-1446-41ed-ab82-c1d3162bfe1c@w9g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
The water moved vehicles in 2010 thanks to fuel cells…
http://cooldreamcars.googlepages.com/water_fuel_cars_2010
See, BMW also proves that "Hydrogen on demand" made by Amercan amateurs is bogus and useless.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"BMW, which was introduced in the last room of the Frankfurt car, a
version of the 7 Series that combines hydrogen and gasoline. The
problem with the vehicles that are currently powered by hydrogen is
the lack of a distribution network and the large size of this gas
tank, remaining space for passengers and luggage compartment of the
vehicle. "
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 18, 2008 18:54
chuckcar, ye begrimed puke-stocking, rogue, hence, avant vanish like
hailstones go, ye despaired:
> The *exact* message might allow you to get an answer. I have a strong
> hunch it has nothing to do with
Let us (tinu) not forget that you also have a "strong hunch" that "Hydrogen
*isn't* an explosive gas."
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List
|
| Show full article (0.84Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 18, 2008 18:39
chuckcar, ye drunk fawning greyhound, thou art a most notable coward, an
infinite and endless liar, an hourly promise breaker, the owner of not
one good quality, ye irrupted:
> Hydrogen *isn't* an explosive gas.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! LMFARO@YOU
You utterly fucking witless need24hoursupport.retard.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List
|
| Show full article (0.82Kb) |
|
25 Comments |
|
  |
Author:
Date: Jul 18, 2008 15:24
> Subject: Re: Sodium metal
> From: "Richard A. Weisiger" itsa.ucsf.edu>
> Date: Sep 18 1996
> Newsgroups: rec.pyrotechnics
>
> tonywilk wrote:
>>
>>>>> Can anybody tell me how to make sodium metal?
>> *snip*
>>>From what I recall, it's a process similar to electrolysis of hydrogen
>>>and oxygen from water
>>>- first, take 50 lbs of salt, heat until a liquid,
>> *snip*
>>
>> You forgot to mention the stove setting...
>> I guess over 800 C would be about gas mark 24 :-)
>
> Actually it _is_ possible, but VERY hazardous. If you use sodium
> hydroxide (e.g., lye, MP 318 celsius, 604 F) instead of salt, you can ...
|
| Show full article (6.11Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: CBXXXCBXXX
Date: Jul 18, 2008 02:40
And the Water4gas bastard continues to make excuses...bla... bla...
The mile-per-gallon went backward, instead of going up, it went down 2 miles loss in performance.
18mpg it went 16mpg. Great! That's really a gas solver! Not only that, the car requires two services in 10- days. WOW! with engine light on. That's just Great!
The bastard tried to excuse himself acting like he knows what's going on inside the car computer, he tried to explain such and such sensor is doing this and that, oh this oh that....bla....bla...
He didn't want to admit that his Water4Scam is a whole bunch of shit.
He claims 7%% of people having this failure but No he's wrong, I knew lots of people having problems with his HydroShit4Gas.....Heehee.......Heehee.......
|
| |
|
6 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|