Hum from phone wires running next to mains?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.electronics.equipment only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

sci.electronics.equipment Profile…
 Up
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: JosephKK
Date: Mar 10, 2008 18:03

On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:46:53 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
wrote:
Show full article (0.95Kb)
no comments
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: JosephKK
Date: Mar 10, 2008 18:07

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:02:09 +0000 (GMT), Stuart
dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
>In article <63ishuF282s6lU1@mid.individual.net>,
> Ivor Jones wrote:
>> Nobody's forcing you to read my message. Which is written in plain text,
>> by the way. If you can't cope with a simple : character in a bit of
>> ASCII text, tough.
>
>I think the only real issue is that ":" could appear naturally in a "plain
>text" email as it is a standard punctuation mark, ">" is far less likely
>though I suppose ": :" is unlikely too.

IIRC the RFC specifies that the quote marking character be in the
first column. The rest of the line is then simple quoted unless the
quoting level causes a word wrap. No big deal for me either way.
no comments
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: JosephKK
Date: Mar 10, 2008 19:09

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:06:17 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
wrote:
Show full article (1.01Kb)
no comments
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: JosephKK
Date: Mar 10, 2008 19:12

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:06:17 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
wrote:
Show full article (0.99Kb)
no comments
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: JosephKK
Date: Mar 10, 2008 19:14

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:18:49 -0400, krw att.bizzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>In article <63ishuF282s6lU1@mid.individual.net>,
>ivor@thisaddressis.invalid says...
>>
>> "krw" att.bizzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.223dff2f50174ee99898e2@news.individual.net
>> : ...
Show full article (1.02Kb)
no comments
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: JosephKK
Date: Mar 10, 2008 19:15

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:07:16 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
wrote:
>
>
>"Stuart" dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
>news:4f7d876e8aSW_NOSPAM@dsl.pipex.com
>
>[snip]
>
>: > Can't say as it caused me any issues here except the
>: > fact of ": :" putting it down to the second level of
>: > quoting as if you had used "> >"
>
>Fixed. That *was* a misconfiguration ;-)
>
>Ivor

Thank you.
no comments
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: phil-news-nospam
Date: Mar 10, 2008 18:20

In alt.engineering.electrical JosephKK yahoo.com> wrote:
| On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:06:17 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
| wrote:
|
|>
|>"Stuart" dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
|>news:4f7d88c922SW_NOSPAM@dsl.pipex.com
|>: > In article <63ishuF282s6lU1@mid.individual.net>,
|>: > Ivor Jones wrote:
|>
|>: >> Nobody's forcing you to read my message. Which is
|>: >> written in plain text, by the way. If you can't cope
|>: >> with a simple : character in a bit of ASCII text,
|>: >> tough.
|>: >
|>: > I think the only real issue is that ":" could appear
|>: > naturally in a "plain text" email as it is a standard
|>: > punctuation mark, ">" is far less likely though I
|>: > suppose ": :" is unlikely too.
|> ...
Show full article (2.14Kb)
no comments
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: Ivor Jones
Date: Mar 10, 2008 18:49

"Ian Smith" orrery.e4ward.com> wrote in
message news:13tb51ne41g1dd9@corp.supernews.com

[snip]

: > Can't the two of you continue this by email and stop
: > wasting everyone else's bandwidth?
: >
: > regards, Ian

Well putting my pedant's hat on, you don't *have* to read it..!

But in any case I am saying no more, I'm as tired of the argument as you
are.

Ivor
no comments
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: Ivor Jones
Date: Mar 10, 2008 18:56

ipal.net> wrote in message
news:fr4fcs0225b@news3.newsguy.com

[snip]

: There is a ": > " in front of the text I wrote that you
: quoted. That is TWO characters of intending. It is NOT
: converting the previous quote mark because there was no
: previous quote mark from me, other than for the text
: I quoted which has a "| " in front.

Ah, *finally* I see it. I am using OE with the QuoteFix addon and both
were inserting quotemarks, OE was inserting a > and Quotefix the : so yes
there were two quotemarks.

Hope this is ok now, many apologies to all for my obtuseness.

Ivor
no comments
Re: Hum from phone wires running next to mains?         


Author: Ivor Jones
Date: Mar 10, 2008 18:58

"David Taylor" yadt.co.uk> wrote in message
news:slrnftavi4.vqe.davidt-news@outcold.yadt.co.uk

[snip]

: Quote with ":" if you like. Quote with ">" if you like.
: But don't quote with ": >" because that looks like two
: levels of quoting.

I've finally figured out what was wrong. I'm using OE with the Quotefix
addon, both were adding quotemarks, I'd changed the one in Quotefix but
forgot that OE itself inserted another one as well.

It should be ok now, apologies for my obtuseness..!

Ivor
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Another wiring question... 20A or 32A fuse for this mains cirquit?uk.diy ·
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15