Vista
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.electronics.design only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

sci.electronics.design Profile…
 Up
Re: File formats crippled in Office 2003         


Author: Joerg
Date: Feb 19, 2008 10:20

Didi wrote:
>> And that is a substantial issue which I believe cost MS quite some
>> sales. For example, I cannot use any word processor unless it is able to
>> write files that can be read into '97 and 2000.
>
> I could understand why one uses ms-word or sort of stuff to create or
> edit
> documents, but I really do not get it why one would use it for
> communication.
> Print the whole thing in .pdf format and be done with it?
>

I usually do that. However, there are times when a larger group has to
collaborate on a project and in my cases the members are often thousands
of miles apart. Then you need an easily editable format where everyone
has the tools to edit. And that's the MS-Word format.

[...]

no comments
Re: File formats crippled in Office 2003         


Date: Feb 19, 2008 18:36

In article <76Fuj.6891$Ru4.535@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net>,
notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net says...
> Didi wrote:
>>> And that is a substantial issue which I believe cost MS quite some
>>> sales. For example, I cannot use any word processor unless it is able to
>>> write files that can be read into '97 and 2000.
>>
>> I could understand why one uses ms-word or sort of stuff to create or
>> edit
>> documents, but I really do not get it why one would use it for
>> communication.
>> Print the whole thing in .pdf format and be done with it?

... and YOY does everyone want resumes in "word format"? PDFs are
perfect for this, but there is no arguing the point.

(and why can't I reply to your post?)
> I usually do that. However, there are times when a larger group has to
> collaborate on a project and in my cases the members are often thousands
> of miles apart. Then you need an easily editable format where everyone
> has the tools to edit. And that's the MS-Word format.
Show full article (1.14Kb)
no comments
Re: File formats crippled in Office 2003         


Author: Joerg
Date: Feb 20, 2008 09:04

krw wrote:
> In article <76Fuj.6891$Ru4.535@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net>,
> notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net says...
>> Didi wrote:
>>>> And that is a substantial issue which I believe cost MS quite some
>>>> sales. For example, I cannot use any word processor unless it is able to
>>>> write files that can be read into '97 and 2000.
>>> I could understand why one uses ms-word or sort of stuff to create or
>>> edit
>>> documents, but I really do not get it why one would use it for
>>> communication.
>>> Print the whole thing in .pdf format and be done with it?
>
> ... and YOY does everyone want resumes in "word format"? PDFs are
> perfect for this, but there is no arguing the point.
>
> (and why can't I reply to your post?)
>
>> I usually do that. However, there are times when a larger group has to
>> collaborate on a project and in my cases the members are often thousands ...
Show full article (1.41Kb)
no comments
Re: File formats crippled in Office 2003         


Author: Robert Adsett
Date: Feb 19, 2008 19:29

In article news.individual.net>, krw says...
> ... and YOY does everyone want resumes in "word format"? PDFs are
> perfect for this, but there is no arguing the point.

Their keyword extractors are built to parse Word (or are written in
VBA).

Robert

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
no comments
Re: File formats crippled in Office 2003         


Date: Feb 21, 2008 19:02

In article free.teranews.com>, sub2
@aeolusdevelopment.com says...
> In article news.individual.net>, krw says...
>> ... and YOY does everyone want resumes in "word format"? PDFs are
>> perfect for this, but there is no arguing the point.
>
> Their keyword extractors are built to parse Word (or are written in
> VBA).

I suppose. In one of the groups a while back someone claimed that
he'd gotten an interview for a job he wasn't qualified for because
he listed the language of interest as one he did NOT know. Maybe
there is a way to beat them at their own game. ;-)

--
Keith
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6