> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:42:01 -0800 (PST), Andy Peters
>
>
>
> latke.net> wrote:

>>On Feb 21, 6:56 pm, Jim Thompson >>Web-Site.com> wrote:

>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:40:59 -0800 (PST), Andy Peters

>

>>> latke.net> wrote:

>>>>On Feb 21, 6:23 pm, Jim Thompson >>>>Web-Site.com> wrote:

>>>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:16:33 -0800 (PST), Andy Peters

>

>>>>> latke.net> wrote:

>>>>>>On Feb 21, 5:35 pm, mpm aol.com> wrote:

>>>>>>> On Feb 21, 6:45?pm, Jim Thompson

> ...

>
> You LOVE to paint with the broad brush. In your bitter little mind,
> ALL "leftists" (meaning anyone to the left of Attila the Hun) are
> "weenies."
>
> So we can apply the same broad brush to conservatives. You ARE a
> Republican and you DO VOTE for Republicans, right? Then by casting
> your vote for those people, YOU SUPPORT THEIR AGENDA, which includes
> such "family-values" tripe as "defense of marriage" and terrorizing
> all illegal immigrants (who does your lawn, BTW?) and torturing in
> secret overseas prisons and illegally wiretapping American citizens
> and so on.
>
> And it really IS irrelevant if you think the Republican party has been
> hijacked by the Christianist right. By your own logic, if you VOTE for
> the party, it means that you AGREE with the entire plank.
>
> I'd respect conservatives if they did some very simple things:
> ...

>On Feb 21, 10:08 pm, Jim Thompson >Web-Site.com> wrote:

>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:42:01 -0800 (PST), Andy Peters
>>
>>
>>
>> latke.net> wrote:

>>>On Feb 21...

> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:17:21 -0800 (PST), James Arthur
>
> yahoo.com> wrote:

>>On Feb 21, 8:42 pm, Andy Peters latke.net> wrote:

>

>>> Ah, the old "I know a homosexual/Jew/African-American, so I cannot be
>>> a homophobe/anti-semite/racist" argument. Sorry, buddy, as long as you
>>> align yourself with the right-wing homophobes/anti-semites/racists,
>>> you get lumped in with them.

>

>>FWIW, all the racists I know are Democrats. Really.

>

>>--James Arthur

>
> Interesting: based on recent voting in the Democratic primaries, white
> males are more sexist than racist.
>
> John ...

> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:26:57 -0800 (PST), Andy Peters
>

>>He and Shadegg ...

>
> Why don't you like Shadegg?  He just announced his retiremnt from
> Congress as he said he would when he ran for office.  However the
> public has risen up and asked him to stay.  So he's changed his mind.
>

>Jim Thompson My-Web-Site.com> wrote in
>news:gprtr31a7epshlqlj2q79imjjno4clh036@4ax.com:
>

>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:30:52 -0500, Fred Bloggs nospam.com>
>> wrote...

> James Arthur yahoo.com> wrote in news:293eaeb2-c683-4991-
> a6a3-2feca297a...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>

>> On Feb 21, 8:42 pm, Andy Peters latke.net> wrote:

>

>>> Ah, the old "I know a homosexual/Jew/African-American, so I cannot be
>>> a homophobe/anti-semite/racist" argument. Sorry, buddy, as long as you
>>> align yourself with the right-wing homophobes/anti-semites/racists,
>>> you get lumped in with them.

>

>> FWIW, all the racists I know are Democrats. Really.

>

>> --James Arthur

>
> the DemocRATs are the ones who believe that blacks need Affirmative Action
> to compete with whites.

> On Feb 22, 8:58 am, John Larkin wrote:

>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:17:21 -0800 (PST), James Arthur

> wrote:

>>>FWIW, all the racists I know are Democrats. Really.

>

>>>--James Arthur

>

>> Interesting: based on recent voting in the Democratic primaries, white
>> males are more sexist than racist.

>

>> John

>
> Or that women are sexist and/or racist, and so flock to Hillary.
>
> The buzz in a certain loved-one's crowd (affluent, very liberal
> Democrats)

> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:26:57 -0800 (PST), Andy Peters
>

>>and torturing in
>>secret overseas prisons and illegally wiretapping American citizens
>>and so on.

>
> What bullshit.  The wiretaps are on overseas links (inbound).

>>Hey, how's your buddy Renzi doin'?

>
> He just (deservedly) got indicted for real estate manipulations,
> unrelated to his Congressional job.