|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Jim YanikJim Yanik Date: Feb 23, 2008 08:55
> On Feb 22, 7:23 pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:>> On Feb 22, 5:27 pm, Jim Yanik abuse.gov> wrote:
>>>>> Andy Peters latke.net> wrote>> [....]
>>>> Bill Clinton was impeached...
|
| Show full article (1.37Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: mpmmpm Date: Feb 23, 2008 10:31
On Feb 22, 10:13�pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:
> If 50%% of your offspring are insane, your genes are less likely to be
> carried into future generations.
If I father 2 children, then maybe you have a point.
If I father 20 children, your argument starts to fall apart.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: mpmmpm Date: Feb 23, 2008 10:34
On Feb 22, 10:16�pm, John Larkin
highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:21:45 -0700, Jim Thompson
>
>
>
>
>
> My-Web-Site.com> wrote:>>On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:42:51 -0800, John Larkin
>> highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:>
>>>On 22 Feb 2008 17:25:50 GMT, Jim Yanik abuse.gov> wrote:>
>>[snip]
>
>>>>I consider homos to be mentally ill,like the psychologists used to believe
>>>>before the Politically Correct Socialists took over. ABnormal.
>
>>>It must have a biological function, or evolution would have ...
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mpmmpm Date: Feb 23, 2008 10:35
On Feb 22, 10:23�pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:> On Feb 22, 5:27 pm, Jim Yanik abuse.gov> wrote:
>>> Andy Peters latke.net> wrote> [....]
>>> Bill Clinton was impeached for a blow job, which of course was
>>> unrelated to his Presidential job.
>
>> It was on "company time",by the employer and management of the
>> intern,BESIDES the huge LIE to the American People,and the PERJURY for
>> which he was disbarred for a too-short a period.
>
> There was no perjury. �Check the record. �Perjury requires that the
> subject being lied about be germane. �The topic on which he lied was
> not.
>
> Question: �Who old are you
> lie from woman: �29
>
> If the true age was not germane to the case this is not perjury. ...
|
| Show full article (0.89Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: mpmmpm Date: Feb 23, 2008 10:40
On Feb 23, 10:49�am, "Michael A. Terrell" earthlink.net>
wrote:> Jim Thompson wrote:
> � �Pick out your cardboard box now, while the choices are still good. :(
Hey Mike.
Don't know about you, but I'm planning to make mine out of leftover
"butterfly" ballots. :)
FWIW, my friend's Mom calls her "Hitlery", though she'll probably end
up voting democratic this time anyway.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: John LarkinJohn Larkin Date: Feb 23, 2008 10:56
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:31:51 -0800 (PST), mpm aol.com>
wrote:
>On Feb 22, 10:13?pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:
>>> If 50%% of your offspring are insane, your genes are less likely to be
>> carried into future generations.
>
>If I father 2 children, then maybe you have a point.
>If I father 20 children, your argument starts to fall apart.
Having 20 kids would make you insane!
John
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MooseFETMooseFET Date: Feb 23, 2008 13:20
On Feb 23, 10:31 am, mpm aol.com> wrote:> On Feb 22, 10:13�pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:
>>> If 50%% of your offspring are insane, your genes are less likely to be
>> carried into future generations.
>
> If I father 2 children, then maybe you have a point.
> If I father 20 children, your argument starts to fall apart.
My argument still works just fine for 20 children. If 17 of your 20
children, on the average will, die before reproducing having 50%% of
your children being insane still makes your DNA unlikely to be around
in a couple of generations. Creatures with death rates for their
offspring often compensate with having large numbers of offspring.
When humans try to overwelm the odds by having many children, they
have to spread the support among them. Human children take a lot of
raising so it put each one at a disadvantage when this is dine.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MooseFETMooseFET Date: Feb 23, 2008 13:20
On Feb 23, 10:56 am, John Larkin
highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:31:51 -0800 (PST), mpm aol.com>
> wrote:
>>>On Feb 22, 10:13?pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:>
>>> If 50%% of your offspring are insane, your genes are less likely to be
>>> carried into future generations.
>
>>If I father 2 children, then maybe you have a point.
>>If I father 20 children, your argument starts to fall apart.
>
> Having 20 kids would make you insane!
Ah, but which is the cause and which the effect?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MooseFETMooseFET Date: Feb 23, 2008 13:23
On Feb 23, 8:55 am, Jim Yanik abuse.gov> wrote:>> On Feb 22, 7:23 pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:>>> On Feb 22, 5:27 pm, Jim Yanik abuse.gov> wrote:>
>>>> Andy Peters latke.net> wrote>>> [....]
>>>>> Bill Clinton was impeached for a blow job, which of course was
>>>>> unrelated to his Presidential job.
>
>>>> It was on "company time",by the employer and management of the
>>>> intern,BESIDES the huge LIE to the American People,and the PERJURY for
>>>> which he was disbarred for a too-short a period.
>
>>> There was no perjury. Check the record. Perjury requires that the
>>> subject being lied about be germane. The topic on which he lied was ...
|
| Show full article (1.62Kb) |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: MooseFETMooseFET Date: Feb 23, 2008 13:24
On Feb 23, 10:35 am, mpm aol.com> wrote:> On Feb 22, 10:23�pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Feb 22, 5:27 pm, Jim Yanik abuse.gov> wrote:>
>>> Andy Peters latke.net> wrote>> [....]
>>>> Bill Clinton was impeached for a blow job, which of course was
>>>> unrelated to his Presidential job.
>
>>> It was on "company time",by the employer and management of the
>>> intern,BESIDES the huge LIE to the American People,and the PERJURY for
>>> which he was disbarred for a too-short a period.
>
>> There was no perjury. �Check the record. �Perjury requires that the
>> subject being lied about be germane. �The topic on which he lied was
>> not.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
