New Book of Rules

Re: New Book of Rules

POPULAR GROUPS

sci.electronics.design Profile…

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Michael A. Terrell
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:04

Phat Bytestard wrote:

>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:08:04 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
> example.net> Gave us:
>

>>So now, why do we have to KEEP ON KILLING people?

>
> Do you honestly believe we could all do the Rodney King?
>
> If so you are too far gone for this thread, little boy.
>

>> How long do you have to
>>keep proving you're king of the hill, before you become a grown-up and
>>start to lead by example?

>
> Do you really think that is what it is about with us? We sit back,
> get smacked, and retards like you think we should turn the other
> cheek.
>

>>Is it just a mental disease? ...

Show full article (0.95Kb)

no comments

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Eeyore
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:02

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Show full article (0.70Kb)

28 Comments

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Eeyore
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:03

Phat Bytestard wrote:

> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:44:54 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
> doubleclick.net> Gave us:
>

>>It's just so tragic that all of that knowledge and technology is applied
>>to killing people. )-;

>
> Protecting people actually, you fucking retard.

Bombing civilians is a very strange way of protecting anyone.

Graham

422 Comments

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Eeyore
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:05

Phat Bytestard wrote:

> You really are 100% clueless about armaments.It isn't a race. It is
> a protector. A defensive tool.

What's defensive about bombing civilians ? Maybe American news isn't brave
enough to show the truth ?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5232434.stm

A human rights group says the Israeli air strike on Qana that killed 54
civilians is a "war crime".

Graham

57 Comments

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Phat Bytestard
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:07

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:22:45 +0100, Eeyore
REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us:

Show full article (1.22Kb)

57 Comments

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Michael A. Terrell
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:10

Eeyore wrote:

>
> "Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>

>> Eeyore wrote:

>>>
>>> "Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>>>

>>>> Eeyore wrote:

>>>>> Hezbollah is a militia too of course too. You Americans should *support* it !
>>>>>
>>>>> Graham

>>>>
>>>> More proof that you are insane. :(

>>>
>>> More proof that you're two-faced.
>>>
>>> If a well-regulated militia is good for America why shouldn't it be good elsewhere ?
>>> ...

Show full article (1.02Kb)

25 Comments

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Phat Bytestard
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:10

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:32:07 -0700, John Larkin
highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:

Show full article (1.18Kb)

no comments

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Phat Bytestard
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:12

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:38:10 -0700, Jim Thompson

My-Web-Site.com> Gave us:

>
>We ought to just ship the prisoners to Turkey.
>
>Maybe send you as well ?:-)

Turkish prison are virtual death sentences.. even for Turks.

They are mean fuckers too! If they do not draw your blood in a
fight, they draw their own. Guess how determined *that* makes them.

The GrahamTard wouldn't last two days in such a place.

3 Comments

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Michael A. Terrell
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:17

Eeyore wrote:

>
> Phat Bytestard wrote:
>

>> You really are 100% clueless about armaments.It isn't a race. It is
>> a protector. A defensive tool.

>
> What's defensive about bombing civilians ? Maybe American news isn't brave
> enough to show the truth ?
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5232434.stm
>
> A human rights group says the Israeli air strike on Qana that killed 54
> civilians is a "war crime".
>
> Graham

Show full article (1.47Kb)

28 Comments

Re: New Book of Rules

Author: Phat Bytestard
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:16

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:50:41 +0100, Eeyore
REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us:

>
>
>John Larkin wrote:
>

>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:06:46 +0100, Eeyore
>> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>

>>>
>>>
>>>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>

>>>> Well? We all know...

Show full article (1.65Kb)

no comments