Re: New Book of Rules
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.electronics.design only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

sci.electronics.design Profile…
 Up
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Eeyore
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:54

Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:22:08 +0100, Eeyore
> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore
>>>
Show full article (1.91Kb)
54 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Michael A. Terrell
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:55

Eeyore wrote:
>
> John Fields wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore
>> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hell, ship them to England and let Eeyore rehabilitate them. That
>>>> way he can find out first hand exactly the kind of being he is
>>>> defending.
>>>
>>>Some of them *have* been returned to England where they *live* !
>>>
>>>I'm defending the rule of law which the USA seems to find convenient to forget about when
>>>it suits you.
>>
>> --- ...
Show full article (1.12Kb)
no comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Phat Bytestard
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:56

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:15:25 -0700, John Larkin
highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:
> Except for Taiwan, China seems to have no
>territorial ambitions at the moment.

Is that why "The China Construction Bank" is the world's biggest
bank right now?

I think they are to be feared for their ambitions. Their overt piracy
was a clue. Now, they get to play in OUR world economy, yet are still
allowed to operate a full on communist rule. Stealing whatever they
want along the way. Sounds like a march to me.

Sum Ting Wong.
1 Comment
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Michael A. Terrell
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:57

Phat Bytestard wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:44:54 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
> doubleclick.net> Gave us:
>
>>On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:30:42 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:31:37 GMT, Phat Bytestard
>>>
>>>> Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
>>>>protector, the Joint Strike Fighter Program.
>>>
>>> Hey, so am I. They're using my arbs to simulate all sorts of stuff to
>>> the engine control computers, so they can test the software before
>>> they actually fly it. The driveshaft to the lift fan is interesting...
>>> 32,000 hp excites all sorts of twists and vibration modes. We make
>>> some tach/overspeed modules too, and we're working on a realtime
>>> torque sensor thing. We're doing thermocouple and RTD simulators too,
>>> for pretty much the same reasons.
>>>
>>> Nowadays planes are just sensors, computers, and actuators, with lots ...
Show full article (1.62Kb)
no comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Phat Bytestard
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:58

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:08:04 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
example.net> Gave us:
>
>Yeah, great, it won us a two-front war fifty years ago.
>
>We Won!
>
>We're the Champs!

You're an idiot, and would never have been born had we lost. Can you
even fathom that fact?

Also, it was nearly 70 years ago now.
no comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Eeyore
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:55

Jim Thompson wrote:
> Wait until we pass a law stating that, when fighting combatants that
> don't fight under the Geneva Convention rules, we don't have to either
> ;-)

What change would that make ?

You Americans shoot up civilians already !

Graham
19 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Eeyore
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:56

Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:24:13 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>And what are they going to do when their soldiers are *not* handed back
>>unilaterally?
>>
>>Dirk
>
> You're naive. They're already dead.

If Hezbollah had any sense they'd be very *alive*. I'll be curious to see.

Graham
6 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Eeyore
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:59

John Fields wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:28:29 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>John Fields wrote:
>>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:57:57 +0100, Eeyore
>
>>Of course you will - Israel will demand it and you will obey.
>
> ---
> Israel will ask for what they need and we'll be happy to help them.
> They are our friends

In your dreams. Israel just knows that the Jewish lobby keeps America a soft
touch for them.
> and we'll support them in any way we can.

Which is making the USA ever more loathed worldwide ! It's entirely contrary to
the USA's best long-term interests too.

Graham
3 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Phat Bytestard
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:00

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:08:04 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
example.net> Gave us:
>So now, why do we have to KEEP ON KILLING people?

Do you honestly believe we could all do the Rodney King?

If so you are too far gone for this thread, little boy.
> How long do you have to
>keep proving you're king of the hill, before you become a grown-up and
>start to lead by example?

Do you really think that is what it is about with us? We sit back,
get smacked, and retards like you think we should turn the other
cheek.
>Is it just a mental disease?

With types like you... very much so. It is called delusion.
1 Comment
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Phat Bytestard
Date: Jul 31, 2006 19:02

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:06:46 +0100, Eeyore
REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us:
>It would be nice if the USA which likes to tout itself as a civilised example to
>the rest of the world could obey the Geneva Convention wouldn't it ?

You're an idiot.

We should stamp the fuckers out.

You and they are just lucky that we are as nice as we are.
no comments
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11