|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Phat BytestardPhat Bytestard Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:26
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:00:11 GMT, Fred Bloggs nospam.com> Gave
us:
>
>
>Phat Bytestard wrote:
>
>>
>> Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
>> protector, the Joint Strike Fighter Program. If you had a clue, you
>> might have some credibility.
>>
>
>Nah- that's the last employer who terminated your employment when you
>were arrested for illegal substance possession, or you failed a random
>drug screening, or both.
You're an idiot. I have a prescription for one thing. So "failed"
screenings have no recourse against me.
Also, the folks at this company are a little like Bill Gates without
the anal segment of his personality.
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: Dirk Bruere at NeoPaxDirk Bruere at NeoPax Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:27
John Fields wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore
> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
>> "Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>>
>>> Hell, ship them to England and let Eeyore rehabilitate them. That
>>> way he can find out first hand exactly the kind of being he is
>>> defending.
>> Some of them *have* been returned to England where they *live* !
>>
>> I'm defending the rule of law which the USA seems to find convenient to forget about when
>> it suits you.
>
> ---
> Extraordinary measures are called for during times of war.
>
>
|
| Show full article (0.66Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Dirk Bruere at NeoPaxDirk Bruere at NeoPax Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:28
John Fields wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:57:57 +0100, Eeyore
> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
>> John Fields wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:08:04 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
>>> example.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> So now, why do we have to KEEP ON KILLING people?
>>> ---
>>> We don't. It's pretty much the choice of whoever wants to fuck with
>>> us or our friends whether they get killed or not.
>>>
>>> I guess your selective memory has forgotten that we always go for a
>>> diplomatic solution prior to engaging in hostilities, and the reason
>>> we have to kick ass is because we sometimes have to deal with
>>> animals who don't know how to or, more often, won't listen to reason
>>> and only understand physical conflict . ...
|
| Show full article (1.44Kb) |
| 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: Jim ThompsonJim Thompson Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:29
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:22:08 +0100, Eeyore
REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore
>> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
>>>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hell, ship...
|
| Show full article (1.99Kb) |
| 77 Comments |
|
|
Author: John FieldsJohn Fields Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:33
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:24:13 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
gmail.com> wrote:
>"Bring em on!"
>Now, where have I heard that one before?
---
From your mother when the fleet sailed in? ;)
---
>And how can Israel militarily defeat an organisation as nebulous as
>Hezbollah? Are they going to kill every Lebanese supporter? From the air?
>
>And what are they going to do when their soldiers are *not* handed back
>unilaterally?
---
Since you don't seem to know, I guess we'll just have to wait and
see, no?
--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: Jim ThompsonJim Thompson Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:34
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:25:58 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
gmail.com> wrote:
>Jim Thompson wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore
>> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>>> "Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hell, ship them to England...
|
| Show full article (1.61Kb) |
| 21 Comments |
|
|
Author: Jim ThompsonJim Thompson Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:35
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:24:13 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
gmail.com> wrote:
>Jim Thompson wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Such heroes they'll be when Israel brings out MOAB ;-)
>
>"Bring em on!"
>Now, where have I heard that one before?
>
>And how can Israel militarily defeat an organisation as nebulous as
>Hezbollah? Are they going to kill every Lebanese supporter? From the air?
Yep.
>
>And what are they going to do when their soldiers are *not* handed back
>unilaterally?
>
>Dirk
You're naive. They're already dead.
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
| 8 Comments |
|
|
Author: Jim ThompsonJim Thompson Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:42
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:20:58 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
gmail.com> wrote:
>Jim Thompson wrote:
[snip]
>
>Your master's voice...
>
>Dirk
Did you bother reading the article, or are you just shooting your
leftist weenie mouth off after seeing the picture of Bush at the
Wailing Wall?
The article, if you bothered to read, is by Ed Koch, a former mayor of
New York City.
I know it's a lot to ask, but read the article and try to think... I
know, it's difficult, but give it a shot ;-)
|
| Show full article (1.14Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Phat BytestardPhat Bytestard Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:41
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:30:42 -0700, John Larkin
highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:
>On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:31:37 GMT, Phat Bytestard
> getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>
>>> Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
>>protector, the Joint Strike...
|
| Show full article (1.54Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: John FieldsJohn Fields Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:42
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:28:29 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
gmail.com> wrote:
>John Fields wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:57:57 +0100, Eeyore
>Of course you will - Israel will demand it and you will obey.
---
Israel will ask for what they need and we'll be happy to help them.
They are our friends and we'll support them in any way we can.
Whether you find that arrangement something you agree with or not is
immaterial since your opinion is irrelevant and you're powerless to
do anything about it.
--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
|
| |
| 4 Comments |
|
|
|
|
