Re: New Book of Rules
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.electronics.design only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

sci.electronics.design Profile…
 Up
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Eeyore
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:09

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
> Eeyore wrote:
>>
>> John Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:06:46 +0100, Eeyore
>>> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>> ...
Show full article (1.50Kb)
53 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Jim Thompson
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:14

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore
REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>
>> Hell, ship them to England and let Eeyore rehabilitate them. That
>> way he can find out first hand exactly the kind of being he is
>> defending.
>
>Some of them *have* been returned to England where they *live* !

Oh, really? I didn't know we'd snagged any Brits pretending to be
terrorists.
>
>I'm defending the rule of law which the USA seems to find convenient to forget about when
>it suits you.
>
>Graham
Show full article (1.28Kb)
138 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Jim Thompson
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:16

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:57:57 +0100, Eeyore
REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>John Fields wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:08:04 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
>> example.net> wrote:
>>
>>>So now, why do we have to KEEP ON KILLING people?
>>
>> ---
>> We don't...
Show full article (1.75Kb)
27 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Jim Thompson
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:19

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:09:35 +0100, Eeyore
REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>
[snip]
>>
>> More proof that you are insane. :(
>
>More proof that you're two-faced.
>
>If a well-regulated militia is good for America why shouldn't it be good elsewhere ?
>
>Graham

Show us the "well-regulated". They're thugs.
Show full article (0.93Kb)
4 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:20

Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:28:49 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:44:54 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
>>> doubleclick.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:30:42 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:31:37 GMT, Phat Bytestard
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
>>>>>> protector, the Joint Strike Fighter Program.
>>>>> Hey, so am I. They're using my arbs to simulate all sorts of stuff to
>>>>> the engine control computers, so they can test the software before
>>>>> they actually fly it. The driveshaft to the lift fan is interesting...
>>>>> 32,000 hp excites all sorts of twists and vibration modes. We make
>>>>> some tach/overspeed modules too, and we're working on a realtime
>>>>> torque sensor thing. We're doing thermocouple and RTD simulators too,
>>>>> for pretty much the same reasons. ...
Show full article (1.78Kb)
2 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: John Fields
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:21

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:57:57 +0100, Eeyore
REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>John Fields wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:08:04 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
>> example.net> wrote:
>>
>>>So now, why do we have to KEEP ON KILLING people?
>>
>> ---
>> We don't...
Show full article (1.76Kb)
27 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:24

Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:57:57 +0100, Eeyore
> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> John Fields wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:08:04 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
>>> example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So now, why do we have to KEEP ON KILLING people?
>>> ---
>>> We don't. It's pretty much the choice of whoever wants to fuck with
>>> us or our friends whether they get killed or not.
>>>
>>> I guess your selective memory has forgotten that we always go for a
>>> diplomatic solution prior to engaging in hostilities, and the reason
>>> we have to kick ass is because we sometimes have to deal with
>>> animals who don't know how to or, more often, won't listen to reason
>>> and only understand physical conflict . ...
Show full article (1.55Kb)
25 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Eeyore
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:22

Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore
> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>>
>>> Hell, ship them to England and let Eeyore rehabilitate them. That
>>> way he can find out first hand exactly the kind of being he is
>>> defending.
>>
>>Some of them *have* been returned to England where they *live* !
>
> Oh, really? I didn't know we'd snagged any Brits pretending to be
> terrorists.

I guess your media didn't want to let you know. They seemed pretty harmless actually.
Show full article (1.15Kb)
92 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: John Fields
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:25

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore
REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>
>> Hell, ship them to England and let Eeyore rehabilitate them. That
>> way he can find out first hand exactly the kind of being he is
>> defending.
>
>Some of them *have* been returned to England where they *live* !
>
>I'm defending the rule of law which the USA seems to find convenient to forget about when
>it suits you.

---
Extraordinary measures are called for during times of war.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
15 Comments
Re: New Book of Rules         


Author: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
Date: Jul 31, 2006 18:25

Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:59:22 +0100, Eeyore
> REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>>
>>> Hell, ship them to England and let Eeyore rehabilitate them. That
>>> way he can find out first hand exactly the kind of being he is
>>> defending.
>> Some of them *have* been returned to England where they *live* !
>
> Oh, really? I didn't know we'd snagged any Brits pretending to be
> terrorists.
>
>> I'm defending the rule of law which the USA seems to find convenient to forget about when
>> it suits you.
>>
>> Graham
> ...
Show full article (0.80Kb)
23 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9