|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: bill.slomanbill.sloman Date: Jul 29, 2006 16:17
Phat Bytestard wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:19:53 -0700, John Larkin
> highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:
>>>On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:28:54 GMT, Phat Bytestard
>> getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 08:12:46 -0700, John Larkin
>>> highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:
>>>>>>>On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:01:46 GMT, Fred Bloggs nospam.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You like to talk tough , eh, Mary? Probably poop your pants with
>>>>>partially digested pizza when a circuit breaker trips...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>He's Mary? I thought I was Mary! Let him be Jane or something.
>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.83Kb) |
|
| | 1158 Comments |
|
|
Author: Phat BytestardPhat Bytestard Date: Jul 29, 2006 18:36
On 29 Jul 2006 16:17:15 -0700, bill.sloman@ ieee.org Gave us:
>Fred Bloggs is anything but clueless.
You're a goddamned idiot, just like he is. He has spent years
accusing one poster of being another, and he has likely never gotten
it right.
> He can use a search engine like
>no-one else on this user-group.
You're an idiot. Any monkey can use a search engine. That has not
a goddamned thing to do with Usenet, or posting header analysis,
dumbfuck.
>If you weren't such an inveterate
>nitwit, you'd be aware that he has earned a lot of respect for what he
>knows and what he can find out.
He has also lost a lot of any he may have had for his retarded
accusations.
>It is true that he is inclined to flame the clueless - like you - on
>less provocation than some but then again, you'd be an example of the
>sort of irritating clueless newbie that needs repeated flaming to
>develop a proper sense of their (low) place in the scheme of things.
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
|
| | 1113 Comments |
|
|
Author: Fred BloggsFred Bloggs Date: Jul 30, 2006 06:47
Phat Bytestard wrote:
[...snip non-content...]
We know who you are, a pathetic reject living in a vermin infested
hovel in a parking lot. You have quite a bit of time on your hands due
to your chronic unemployment and overall worthlessness which you use to
attempt to aggravate people in a multitude of newsgroups with your petty
insults, impersonations, pretensions, and jejune comments, because it is
all you have left and wasting time is your life-long habit. You're just
a pitiful little effeminate freak banging furiously away at a keyboard
with your skinny hands and wasted arms as you accelerate into hell, and
ultimately death, no one is going to throw you a parachute.
|
| |
| 1090 Comments |
|
|
Author: Phat BytestardPhat Bytestard Date: Jul 30, 2006 10:31
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 13:47:45 GMT, Fred Bloggs nospam.com> Gave
us:
>
>
>Phat Bytestard wrote:
>[...snip non-content...]
>
>We know who you are, a pathetic reject living in a vermin infested
>hovel in a parking lot.
Wrong. You're an idiot. You know nothing... Even less than
nothing. By the way, dipshit, how many of you did your doctor say
that you are, since your "we" only includes you?
> You have quite a bit of time on your hands due
>to your chronic unemployment and overall worthlessness
Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
protector, the Joint Strike Fighter Program. If you had a clue, you
might have some credibility.
|
| Show full article (1.53Kb) |
| 1089 Comments |
|
|
Author: John LarkinJohn Larkin Date: Jul 30, 2006 10:51
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 01:36:44 GMT, Phat Bytestard
getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>On 29 Jul 2006 16:17:15 -0700, bill.sloman@ ieee.org Gave us:
> >>Fred Bloggs is anything but clueless.
>
> You're a goddamned idiot, just like he is. He has spent years
>accusing one poster of being...
|
| Show full article (1.34Kb) |
| 15 Comments |
|
|
Author: Fred BloggsFred Bloggs Date: Jul 31, 2006 06:00
Phat Bytestard wrote:
>
> Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
> protector, the Joint Strike Fighter Program. If you had a clue, you
> might have some credibility.
>
Nah- that's the last employer who terminated your employment when you
were arrested for illegal substance possession, or you failed a random
drug screening, or both. And you're so far down the chain of cerebral
development, you have no clue of just how obviously flawed are your
claims to being anything more than an unskilled go-for/helper type.
|
| |
| 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: John LarkinJohn Larkin Date: Jul 31, 2006 08:30
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:31:37 GMT, Phat Bytestard
getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
> Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
>protector, the Joint Strike Fighter Program.
Hey, so am I. They're using my arbs to simulate all sorts of stuff to
the engine control computers, so they can test the software before
they actually fly it. The driveshaft to the lift fan is interesting...
32,000 hp excites all sorts of twists and vibration modes. We make
some tach/overspeed modules too, and we're working on a realtime
torque sensor thing. We're doing thermocouple and RTD simulators too,
for pretty much the same reasons.
Nowadays planes are just sensors, computers, and actuators, with lots
of software connecting them. So a major development item is coding and
testing the software. "A bug every 10 lines" just won't do here.
JSF is cool. Single engine, vertical takeoff and land, supersonic
without afterburners. Pratt&Whitney engine.
John
|
| |
| 1080 Comments |
|
|
Author: Rich Grise, Plainclothes HippieRich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie Date: Jul 31, 2006 12:44
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:30:42 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:31:37 GMT, Phat Bytestard
>
>> Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
>>protector, the Joint Strike Fighter Program.
>
> Hey, so am I. They're using my arbs to simulate all sorts of stuff to
> the engine control computers, so they can test the software before
> they actually fly it. The driveshaft to the lift fan is interesting...
> 32,000 hp excites all sorts of twists and vibration modes. We make
> some tach/overspeed modules too, and we're working on a realtime
> torque sensor thing. We're doing thermocouple and RTD simulators too,
> for pretty much the same reasons.
>
> Nowadays planes are just sensors, computers, and actuators, with lots
> of software connecting them. So a major development item is coding and
> testing the software. "A bug every 10 lines" just won't do here.
>
> JSF is cool. Single engine, vertical takeoff and land, supersonic
> without afterburners. Pratt&Whitney engine. ...
|
| Show full article (1.14Kb) |
| 959 Comments |
|
|
Author: John LarkinJohn Larkin Date: Jul 31, 2006 14:06
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:44:54 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
doubleclick.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:30:42 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:31:37 GMT, Phat Bytestard
>>
>>> Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
>>>protector, the...
|
| Show full article (1.29Kb) |
| 68 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Dirk Bruere at NeoPaxDirk Bruere at NeoPax Date: Jul 31, 2006 14:28
John Larkin wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:44:54 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
> doubleclick.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:30:42 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:31:37 GMT, Phat Bytestard
>>>
>>>> Wrong. You're an idiot. I am currently working on the world's next
>>>> protector, the Joint Strike Fighter Program.
>>> Hey, so am I. They're using my arbs to simulate all sorts of stuff to
>>> the engine control computers, so they can test the software before
>>> they actually fly it. The driveshaft to the lift fan is interesting...
>>> 32,000 hp excites all sorts of twists and vibration modes. We make
>>> some tach/overspeed modules too, and we're working on a realtime
>>> torque sensor thing. We're doing thermocouple and RTD simulators too,
>>> for pretty much the same reasons.
>>>
>>> Nowadays planes are just sensors, computers, and actuators, with lots
>>> of software connecting them. So a major development item is coding and
>>> testing the software. "A bug every 10 lines" just won't do here. ...
|
| Show full article (1.49Kb) |
| 67 Comments |
|
|
|
|
