Phat Bytestard wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:19:53 -0700, John Larkin
>
highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:
>>>On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:28:54 GMT, Phat Bytestard
>>
getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 08:12:46 -0700, John Larkin
>>>
highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:
>>>>>>>On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:01:46 GMT, Fred Bloggs
nospam.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You like to talk tough , eh, Mary? Probably poop your pants with
>>>>>partially digested pizza when a circuit breaker trips...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>He's Mary? I thought I was Mary! Let him be Jane or something.
>>>>
>>>>Doesn't anybody respect seniority any more?
>>>>
>>>>(And I see that your penis+poop fascination is as enthusiastic as
>>>>ever. Hang, umm, in there.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Watch out. He gets really pissed when folks call him on his utter
>>>stupidity in Usenet, let alone his fascination with filth.
>>>
>>
>>What's he gonna do, call me dirty names?
>>
>>> Next thing you know, he'll be accusing you of being "Rich Grise" as
>>>well.
>>
>>We are not the same person; he's taller than I am, and skinnier.
>>
>>John
>
> You know that, and now I know that, but the BloggTard is utterly
> clueless.
Fred Bloggs is anything but clueless. He can use a search engine like
no-one else on this user-group. If you weren't such an inveterate
nitwit, you'd be aware that he has earned a lot of respect for what he
knows and what he can find out.
It is true that he is inclined to flame the clueless - like you - on
less provocation than some but then again, you'd be an example of the
sort of irritating clueless newbie that needs repeated flaming to
develop a proper sense of their (low) place in the scheme of things.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
