On Jul 6, 11:59 pm, joseph2k
yahoo.com> wrote:> Simon S Aysdie wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 6:48 pm, MooseFET
rahul.net> wrote:>>> On Jul 5, 3:54 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
example.net>
>>> wrote:>
>>>> What is this "access to the green" stuff you keep chanting?
>
>>> Do you want a contract to be valid and enforced. Do you want police?
>
>> He doesn't want *your* police.
>
>>> You get the courts enforcing contracts
>>> etc.
>
>> You mean he gets *your* police and courts.
>
>> He's saying he does not need a guvmint for these things, and he is
>> correct. Protection and courts would be available on the open market
>> if the guvmint did not claim a coercive monopoly on them by violent
>> force.
>
>
> And why would any sane (non-multimillionare) person trade-in the current,
> admittedly flawed, and price dependant system we have for a pure "how much
> justice can you pay for" based system?
"Price dependent?" That's a hoot. The guvmint monopoly on "justice"
destroyed the price system for courts.
Besides, that is only your warped statist cliche, in any case.
>> You are a statist.
>
> You are a nutter.
Statism is a religion.
