|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Simon S AysdieSimon S Aysdie Date: Jul 6, 2007 18:36
On Jul 6, 5:05 pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:> On Jul 6, 12:27 pm, Simon S Aysdie ti.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 6, 6:26 am, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:>
>>> On Jul 6, 5:10 am, Chuck Harris erols.com> wrote:
>>> You make the choice to use the system by
>>> living in the country, making contracts and driving cars.>
>> Mere question begging.
>
> No. It is point making. You have offered no rebuttal
doi-eeeeeeeeeeee
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: MooseFETMooseFET Date: Jul 6, 2007 18:55
On Jul 6, 12:36 pm, Simon S Aysdie ti.com> wrote:> On Jul 5, 6:48 pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:
>>> On Jul 5, 3:54 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net>
>> wrote:>>> What is this "access to the green" stuff you keep chanting?
>
>> Do you want a contract to be valid and enforced. Do you want police?
>
> He doesn't want *your* police.
He can't have is own unless he leaves. In this country, we agree that
the police should do the police stuff and not bands of armed thugs
like happens in some other places. He is free to go there and enjoy
their system if he wants. The US had police and courts before he got
here. There is no reason for it to change for him.
>> You get the courts enforcing contracts
>> etc.
>
> You mean he gets *your* police and courts.
|
| Show full article (1.80Kb) |
|
| | 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: MooseFETMooseFET Date: Jul 6, 2007 18:58
On Jul 6, 6:24 pm, James Arthur yahoo.com> wrote:> On Jul 6, 4:06 pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Jul 6, 3:27 pm, James Arthur yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> On Jul 6, 1:47 pm, Fred Bloggs nospam.com> wrote:>
>>>> James Arthur wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 6, 5:26 am, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:>
>>>>>>You choose which country to live in and whether to drive a car and
>>>>>>whether to make a contract etc.
>
>>>>> Is there no limit to the taxes justified by this rationale? No
>>>>> question as to the usefulness, quality, or need of the 'services' so
>>>>> forceably supplied?
>
>>>>> "It would be thought a hard government that should tax its people one- ...
|
| Show full article (2.39Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MooseFETMooseFET Date: Jul 6, 2007 19:04
On Jul 6, 1:54 pm, James Arthur yahoo.com> wrote:> On Jul 5, 5:23 am, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Jul 4, 5:56 pm, Bob Quintal wrote:
>
>>> Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net> wrote innews:pan.2007.07.03.22.17.33.503120@example.net:>
>>>> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:58:44 +0000, Bob Quintal wrote:
>>>>> Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net> wrote in>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:42:29 +0000, Bob Quintal wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Hillary is right.
>
>>>>>> No, she's in favor of socialist medicine, which is based on
>>>>>> theft, and therefore wrong.
>
>>>>> Public service medicine is based on theft????
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.21Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Michael A. TerrellMichael A. Terrell Date: Jul 6, 2007 20:40
James Arthur wrote:
>
> But this presumes that health is improved by hiring more
> middlemen--2nd, 3rd and 4th parties. It isn't. Health is improved by
> walking and eating vegetables. It's cheaper than sickness, and more
> fun.
Wow! If you knew what you're talking about the AMA would have a hit
contract out on you. There are a lot of conditions that this simple
minded concept won't prevent, or cure.
> Many people are unhappy for no apparent reason; they seem to like it.
They were nursed with sour Persimmons, and never got over it.
> The pick-pocket delights in your loss, and you have indeed paid for/
> bought some joy--his--but has he not picked your pocket just the same?
Proof that the income tax should be inversely proportional to IQ.
That way they could easily tax idiots out of existence.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: James ArthurJames Arthur Date: Jul 6, 2007 21:22
On Jul 6, 6:04 pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:> On Jul 6, 1:54 pm, James Arthur yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Jul 5, 5:23 am, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:>
>>> On Jul 4, 5:56 pm, Bob Quintal wrote:
>
>>>> Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net> wrote innews:pan.2007.07.03.22.17.33.503120@example.net:>
>>>>> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:58:44 +0000, Bob Quintal wrote:
>>>>>> Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net> wrote in>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:42:29 +0000, Bob Quintal wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Hillary is right.
>
>>>>>>> No, she's in favor of socialist medicine, which is based on
>>>>>>> theft, and therefore wrong.
> ...
|
| Show full article (3.49Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: James ArthurJames Arthur Date: Jul 6, 2007 21:45
On Jul 6, 7:40 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" earthlink.net>
wrote:> James Arthur wrote:
>
>> But this presumes that health is improved by hiring more
>> middlemen--2nd, 3rd and 4th parties. It isn't. Health is improved by
>> walking and eating vegetables. It's cheaper than sickness, and more
>> fun.
>
> Wow! If you knew what you're talking about the AMA would have a hit
> contract out on you.
What I've said is what doctors have been screaming for years. If
you follow the current literature, it's being re-confirmed time and
time again, in greater detail than ever.
It all comes back to a) the basics, and b) you really don't want to
get sick if you can avoid it. Antibiotics are miracles, and a few
other drugs are marvels, but we've still got a long way to go.
> There are a lot of conditions that this simple
> minded concept won't prevent, or cure.
|
| Show full article (1.53Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: krwkrw Date: Jul 7, 2007 06:50
> On Jul 6, 6:24 pm, James Arthur yahoo.com> wrote:>> On Jul 6, 4:06 pm, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>> On Jul 6, 3:27 pm, James Arthur yahoo.com> wrote:>>
>>>> On Jul 6, 1:47 pm, Fred Bloggs nospam.com> wrote:>>
>>>>> James Arthur wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 6, 5:26 am, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:>>
>>>>>>>You choose which country to live in and whether to drive a car and
>>>>>>>whether to make a contract etc.
>>
>>>>>> Is there no limit to the taxes justified by this rationale? No
>>>>>> question as to the usefulness, quality, or need of the 'services' so
>>>>>> forceably supplied? ...
|
| Show full article (2.80Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
