> MooseFET wrote:

>> On Jul 7, 1:12 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net>
>> wrote:

>>> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:10:37 -0400, Chuck Harris wrote:

>>>> Bob Quintal wrote:

>>>>> Taxes are not to pay other people's bills. they're to pay for
>>>>> things that everyboddy uses, like roads, and schools, and
>>>>> hospitals.and fire departments. You may argue that the health of
>>>>> the street sweeper is of no concern to you, but if she spreads
>>>>> tuberculosis to your neighborhood, it damn well is.

>

>>>> May I have your permission to argue that I don't give a rat's ass
>>>> if that lazy hunk of garbage and his spawn starve to death? Why
>>>> should I have to pay for him and the fruit of his lazy loins to
>>>> eat, have shelter, medical coverage, ...?

>

>>> If you're talking about the guy who sweeps your streets once a week,
>>> in that case the neighborhood could get together and ask some street-
>>> sweepers for bids, and if a majority vote for it, then each person ...

> MooseFET wrote:

>> On Jul 7, 12:58 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net>
>> wrote:

>>> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 03:29:34 +0000, Bob Quintal wrote:

>>>> Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net> wrote in

>

>>>>> What is this "access to the green" stuff you keep chanting? I

>

>>>> I stated that taxation is not theft. It's like a membership fee
>>>> to a golf club. If you want to putt on the green you gotta pay
>>>> the fee. If you don't want to putt on the greens, or drink in
>>>> the clubhousew, get off the golf course...

>

>>> Yes, precisely. But I'm not allowed to do that - if I choose not to
>>> pay those fees I never use, they will come and take my money by force.

>

>> You can choose not to do those things that take advanges of the
>> services of the government and thuse not have any fees to pay.

> ...

> MooseFET wrote:

>> On Jul 6, 1:54 pm, James Arthur yahoo.com> wrote:

>>> On Jul 5, 5:23 am, MooseFET rahul.net> wrote:

>

>>>> On Jul 4, 5:56 pm, Bob Quintal wrote:

>

>>>>> Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net> wrote
>>>>> innews:pan.2007.07.03.22.17.33.503120@example.net:

>

>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:58:44 +0000, Bob Quintal wrote:

>>>>>>> Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net> wrote in

>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:42:29 +0000, Bob Quintal wrote:

>

>>>>>>>>> Hillary is right.

>

>>>>>>>> No, she's in favor of socialist medicine, which is based on
>>>>>>>> theft, and therefore wrong.

>

>>>>>>> Public service medicine is based on theft???? ...

> MooseFET wrote:
>

>> On Jul 9, 3:47 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" earthlink.net>
>> wrote:

>

>>> What I mean is that he can eat whatever he wants, and learn that his
>>> hard and fast rules don't always apply. I have lots of people urging me
>>> to become a vegetarian "To feel better!". If I reduce the meat in my
>>> diet much I get VERY sick and so weak I can't even walk.

>

>> Going vedetarian and having diabeties would be a bad combination IMO.
>> The place you can get your protein from always will carry a large carb
>> hit. Also, your body can convert protein to sugar if it really needs
>> to. Having extra protein allows your body to convert that instead of
>> some that you may need for later.

>
> Like I said in another post, the VA dietitian was quite happy with my
> diet. Its everyone else at the VA clinic and VA hospital who tell me ...

>MooseFET wrote:
>

>> On Jul 7, 12:58 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net>
>> wrote:

>>> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 03:29:34 +0000, Bob Quintal wrote:

>>>> Richard The Dreaded Libertarian ...

>On Jul 9, 6:48 pm, Jim Thompson >Site.com> wrote:

>>

>>>There will be order but not liberty. You will have rule by "right of
>>>force" again which is exactly what democracy was supposted to end.

>>
>> 1) We don't have a democracy, we have a republic form of government.

>
>People vote. This is the democratic portion of the system. Democracy
>is how the government gains its right to govern.

>
> On Jul 9, 11:14 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>
> Barley is better is soup anyway.

>> I haven't had a raw carrot in 40 years, so I don't know. I can eat
>> small amounts of them cooked, so I use them in homemade vegetable soup,
>> along with peas, potatoes, tomatoes and green beans and barley.

>
> There's nothing wrong with that soup.

> On Jul 9, 9:31 pm, joseph2k yahoo.com> wrote:
>

>> MooseFET wrote:

>>> On Jul 7, 1:12 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net>
>>> wrote:

> On Jul 9, 2:35 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net>
> wrote:

>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 06:28:29 -0700, MooseFET wrote:

>>> On Jul 7, 3:20 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net>

>>>> That's very, very sad.

>>

>>> It would be if it was true. Equally sad is your child like trust that
>>> because the majority are honest all will be.

>>
>> Maybe it would benefit you to grow up a little bit and learn to discern
>> when a person is trustworthy.

>
> No, it would do you some good. You think you can. This just means
> you haven't met a good con artist yet.

> On Jul 9, 2:35 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net>

>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 06:28:29 -0700, MooseFET wrote:

>>> On Jul 7, 3:20 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian example.net>

>>>> That's very, very sad.

>>

>>> It would be if it was true. Equally sad is your child like trust that
>>> because the majority are honest all will be.

>>
>> Maybe it would benefit you to grow up a little bit and learn to discern
>> when a person is trustworthy.

>
> No, it would do you some good. You think you can. This just means
> you haven't met a good con artist yet.