Global warming redux
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.electronics.design only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

sci.electronics.design Profile…
 Up
Global warming redux         


Author: joseph2k
Date: Apr 20, 2007 05:23

Here is a site with what seems to have more of a science take on the issue:

http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.html

A least part of what makes the site interesting is that not only admit to
alternate explanations they provide pointers or even links to other ideas.
That sounds like real scientific attitude to me.

--
JosephKK
Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.  
--Schiller
8 Comments
Re: Global warming redux         


Author: Jim Thompson
Date: Apr 20, 2007 07:22

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:23:06 GMT, joseph2k yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>Here is a site with what seems to have more of a science take on the issue:
>
>http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.html
>
>A least part of what makes the site interesting is that not only admit to
>alternate explanations they provide pointers or even links to other ideas.
>That sounds like real scientific attitude to me.

Thanks for the link!

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Show full article (0.97Kb)
no comments
Re: Global warming redux         


Author: g
Date: Apr 20, 2007 10:33

On Apr 20, 8:23 am, joseph2k yahoo.com> wrote:
> Here is a site with what seems to have more of a science take on the issue:
>
> http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.html
>
> A least part of what makes the site interesting is that not only admit to
> alternate explanations they provide pointers or even links to other ideas.
> That sounds like real scientific attitude to me.
>
> --
> JosephKK
> Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.
> --Schiller

If we have global warming, the Yellowstone eruption will take care of
that, if Ca. doesn't first fall off first and then we will first have
to think about the economy. The asteroid is on its way.

greg
no comments
Re: Global warming redux         


Author: default
Date: Apr 20, 2007 13:29

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:23:06 GMT, joseph2k yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>Here is a site with what seems to have more of a science take on the issue:
>
>http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.html
>
>A least part of what makes the site interesting is that not only admit to
>alternate explanations they provide pointers or even links to other ideas.
>That sounds like real scientific attitude to me.

Sure hope he's wrong. I was looking at the evidence to suggest that
solar radiation is the primary cause of global warming . . . Lot
harder to fix than CO2, CH4. production.
--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
no comments
Re: Global warming redux         


Author: Martin Riddle
Date: Apr 20, 2007 15:47

Ozone Al !

lol

"joseph2k" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Kg2Wh.11471$YL5.9500@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>
> Here is a site with what seems to have more of a science take on the
> issue:
>
> http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.html
>
> A least part of what makes the site interesting is that not only admit to
> alternate explanations they provide pointers or even links to other ideas.
> That sounds like real scientific attitude to me.
>
> --
> JosephKK
> Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.
> --Schiller
no comments
Re: Global warming redux         


Author: Don Klipstein
Date: Apr 24, 2007 18:21

In article newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>, joseph2k wrote:
>
>Here is a site with what seems to have more of a science take on the issue:
>
>http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.html
>
>A least part of what makes the site interesting is that not only admit to
>alternate explanations they provide pointers or even links to other ideas.
>That sounds like real scientific attitude to me.

I have been there before.

I remember one idea of theirs being that temperature readings at airport
weather stations rose over the years because surrounding trees got taller.

I surely doubt better forestation of airport surroundings than before is
the real or main explanation.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Global Warming Skeptics = LOSERS. LIARSalt.2600 ·
Re: "Nuclear energy 'not the solution to global warming"sci.energy ·
Re: Global warming testsci.military.naval ·
Re: A novel explanation for putative global warming (measuring error, Central Limit Theorem)alt.global-warming ·
Re: global warmingsoc.religion.christian ·
Re: This Is Not Due To Global Warming,West Antarctic Ice Has Been Receding For 20,000 Yearsaus.cars ·
Re: Global Warming Warrior use 20-times as much energyalt.politics.usa ·
AGW advocates -> Global Warming paradise in Britain.sci.environment ·
New Proposals To Fight Global Warming Would End Civilization, Kill Billionsmisc.activism.progressive ·
Re: Czech leader Klaus fights global warming 'religion'alt.autos.toyota ·