Re: conservatives/libertarians position on the minimum wage might charitably be termed 18th century
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.econ only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

 Up
Re: conservatives/libertarians position on the minimum wage might charitably be termed 18th century         

Group: sci.econ · Group Profile
Author: ccr
Date: Oct 18, 2006 13:36

What a laugh, "Heritage Foundation". You truly are a twit, Bunn. Why not the
Cato Institute if you want right wing economic statements unbacked by any
scientific data?????

Raising the minimum wage has never had any of the effects claimed by the
Heritage lies. In fact, studies, based in the real world, have shown them to
be fabrications.

But that's OK keep spouting the clueless right wing drivel, it suits you.
You are an idiot.

--
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of
fighting a foreign enemy." James Madison

"Robert Bunn" twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:C8kZg.62730$uH6.17069@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> Please pardon the self-response, but I had to share this:
>
> D. Mark Wilson, "Raising the Minimum Wage: Rhetoric v. Reality"
> http://www.heritage.org/Research/Labor/EM590.cfm
> D. Mark Wilson argues against an increase in the minimum wage in this
> April 23, 1999 Heritage Foundation Executive Memorandum. He argues that a
> higher minimum wage would:
>
> a.. not have a direct effect on poverty,
>
> b.. make it more difficult to move people from welfare to work,
>
> c.. reduce the amount of job training received by workers,
>
> d.. raise teenage unemployment rates, and
>
> e.. encourage teenagers to drop out of school.
> That ought to make it a great bipartisan effort. The Democrats want
> everybody on welfare, the Republicans want everyone who isn't on welfare
> to be a poorly trained drone, and they both want the average American to
> be too poorly educated to realize that the Two Parties are symbiotes to
> each other and parasites to the people.
>
>
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!