On Feb 27, 2:09 am, Fredrico Juarrez
midtown.con> wrote:> JSH wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 7:43 pm, Fredrico Juarrez
midtown.con> wrote:>>> JSH wrote:
>>>> On Feb 26, 5:09 pm, Vend wrote:
>>>>> On 26 Feb, 07:13, Fredrico Juarrez
midtown.con> wrote:>>>>>> JSH wrote:
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> My place in history is secure even though I know a lot more than most
>>>>>>> of you clearly know so I also know that there may not be much history
>>>>>>> left! Not human history at least.
>>>>>>> But not understanding is what this situation is all about, as some
>>>>>>> people didn't understand that lying about math would invite the
>>>>>>> retribution of the math because they didn't believe in mathematics
>>>>>>> itself.
>>>>>>> The poor field was overrun by people who hate math but found a way to
>>>>>>> work the system by lying. That's all. Nothing more.
>>>>>>> But without advancement in mathematics, humanity has no future, so the
>>>>>>> Universe will just kill off the species as no longer of further use.
>>>>>>> By stopping mathematical progress, these people removed a key element
>>>>>>> in the purpose of the continued existence of the entire species so the
>>>>>>> clock is ticking down faster than any of you can imagine because
>>>>>>> you're too dumb to realize that if YOU lied and got things wrong, why
>>>>>>> couldn't others have?
>>>>>>> Guess at how many years are left, and I'm sure you'll be wrong.
>>>>>>> Yup. The test of humanity was a subtle one but it was very fair.
>>>>>>> It was all about mathematical absolutes.
>>>>>> When reading posts from JSH, you should always keep these facts in mind:
>>>>>> "Alternatively, the narcissist feels victimized by mediocre bureaucrats
>>>>>> and intellectual dwarves who consistently fail to appreciate his
>>>>>> outstanding - really, unparalleled - talents, skills, and
>>>>>> accomplishments. Being haunted by his challenged inferiors substantiates
>>>>>> the narcissist's comparative superiority. Driven by pathological envy,
>>>>>> these pygmies collude to defraud him, badger him, deny him his due,
>>>>>> denigrate, isolate, and ignore him. The narcissist projects onto this
>>>>>> second class of lesser persecutors his own deleterious emotions and
>>>>>> transformed aggression: hatred, rage, and seething jealousy."
>>>>>> "Paranoid ideation - the narcissist's deep-rooted conviction that he
>>>>>> is being persecuted by his inferiors, detractors, or powerful
>>>>>> ill-wishers - serves two psychodynamic purposes. It upholds the
>>>>>> narcissist's grandiosity and it fends off intimacy."
>>>>>> "The paranoid delusions of the narcissist are always grandiose,
>>>>>> "cosmic", or "historical". His pursuers are influential and
>>>>>> formidable. They are after his unique possessions, out to exploit his
>>>>>> expertise and special traits, or to force him to abstain and refrain
>>>>>> from certain actions. The narcissist feels that he is at the center of
>>>>>> intrigues and conspiracies of colossal magnitudes."
>>>>>>
mid.individual.net>>>>>> I'm wondering whether he really believes in what he writes or he just
>>>>> posts to get attention.
>>>> And you post to be ignored?
>>>> Or do you post to get attention?
>>>> Is there anyway to NOT post to get attention?
>>>> I'm curious, can you answer?
>>> [After a long day, and my secretary on vacation, here's what I meant
>>> to write in my previous post.]
>
>>> Yes.
>
>>> The majority of posts are made by someone merely asking a question, or a
>>> series of questions, seeking answers and advice.
>
>> But can you post without in some way seeking attention, even if it is
>> just to get answers or advice?
>
>> Are you not seeking attention with your posts, from other readers?
>
>> Or do you wish your posts to be completely ignored?
>
> I know you know the answer to this already, but I will indulge you.
>
> Posting to find an answer to a question is not the same as posting
> with the intention of drawing attention to yourself.
>
> It goes without saying that with any post there is an implied request
> for recognition and acknowledgment of the post. But the primary reason
> for posting should be in the seeking of information or advice, and not
> in the seeking of attention, solely for attention's sake.
>
> --Fredrico Juarrez
But what if you have a result to share? Are you then posting seeking
information or are you allowed to post to inform?
I'll answer, yes you can post to share information.
There are, in actuality, any number of reasons any particular person
might post, but one common thing in all of those posting is a REQUEST
for attention to the post, even if it is to ask for information or to
give it.
Do you deny that a person with narcissistic personality disorder might
make posts requesting, say, answers to homework problems versus doing
them himself?
Would those present as posts just for attention by your criteria? I
think not, which allows a more rigorous definition of your assertion:
So mental disease or disorder is irrelevant to the specific issue of
requesting attention by posting--as all postings are requests for
attention--so your actual assertion is that I post without giving
legitimate or valuable information or making legitimate requests for
help or information, only to get people to pay attention to me in
particular out of some mental disease or disorder that drives me to be
the center of attention, is that or is that not a correct assessment?
I am anxious for your answer.
Note, if you answer yes you are making a specific claim about the
validity of my mathematical ideas, saying you are evaluating them as
false or have enough information to not only conclude that they are
false, but inform others in a way meant to warn them.
Or do you disagree?
James Harris
