|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: +084+084
Date: Jan 20, 2008 21:05
I have an external hard drive which I want to encrypt.
I have my choices down to either TrueCrypt or SecureDoc
On the following page under "Understanding Encryption Models",
http://www.mysecuredoc.com/plus_ed.asp I wonder if TrueCrypt does the
same thing.
TrueCrypt is opensource but doesn't seem to have any 3rd party
certifications, while SecureDoc says/has a ton of certs to back it up
(below)... Although it is commercial and closed source it seems to
beat out TrueCrypt... what do you experts think?
SecureDoc certs:
FIPS 140-2 Level 2 (Certificate # 698) WinMagic is the only
Software Encryption vendor on the planet to offer this level of
protection.
-- http://winmagic.com/solutions/checklist.html
http://winmagic.com/corporate_info/awards-and-certifications.html
SecureDoc(tm) has been certified by the CSE for Common Criteria EAL 4.
SecureDoc has been evaluated under the terms and conditions of the
Canadian Common Criteria Scheme and complies with the requirements for
EAL 4 Common Criteria Assurance Level.
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
|
| |
4 Comments |
|
|
Author: ZodZod
Date: Jan 20, 2008 20:28
>> Are you sure you can read?
>>
>> Enrico shows, with really rather small examples, that
>> most choices for 'a' do not work. In one case, with
>>
>He does? Ok, if he does I'll acknowledge confusion, as I saw it
>differently.
>Hey, it's math.
your "math", is not Mathematics.
>If I'm wrong, I'm wrong.
Why are you always *Wrong*, JSH ?
>The test is always in the results.
So why don't you test your results with factoring a any number with 8 digits
?
>I'll admit that I'd feel rather disappointed if I'm wrong, but not in
>mathematics.
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: ZodZod
Date: Jan 20, 2008 20:20
> On Jan 20, 12:37 am, hbdere gmx.net> wrote:>> On Jan 20, 1:04 am, JSH gmail.com> wrote:> So, yes, now it's
>> mathematically proven that I found a solution to the>>> factoring problem, and I want to definitely thank Enrico and would
>>> like to give him mention in the paper.
>>
>> That is very honest and generous of you. You should also include a
>> hint about this newsgroup, as this will greatly ease the reviewers job
>> by providing valuable background information.
>
> They already know who I am.
>
> What has been great about Enrico's help is that he is just presenting
> information that is contradictory to some position I've taken, without
> all that extra, like insults, which doesn't help matters at all.
>
> The mathematics is relatively easy algebra, so a lot is about
> interpretation, and getting in all the fine details. ...
|
| Show full article (1.37Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: imagethisnowimagethisnow
Date: Jan 20, 2008 18:56
anyone used Simplite encryption program for Yahoo IM? Does it work or
is it just a false sense of security? Are there other better programs
other than Simplite/Secway made for Yahoo IM? Thanks for any help or
information. It seems fairly difficult to find lots of programs to
encrypt IM...........
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Antony ClementsAntony Clements
Date: Jan 20, 2008 18:53
> Any input should do. The nature of the input makes no difference
> as far as the operation of the algorithm is concerned.
I only ask because there seems to be a timing difference of between .5
seconds and 1 second depending on if it's a simple text file or a jpeg, but
without more accurate timing equipment than a watch i can't know for sure.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Phil CarmodyPhil Carmody
Date: Jan 20, 2008 18:06
"K. Jennings" resurgence.net> writes:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:49:07 +0100, Sebastian G. wrote:
>
>> K. Jennings wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> On a Intel Centrino Duo T7200 (2.20 GHz) I measured about 62 MByte/s
>>>> for AES-128 and 56 MByte/s for AES-256 per core.
>>>
>>> The numbers for Itanium 2 (Montecito at 1.6 GHz) are 184 MByte/s
>>> for AES-128 and 135 MByte/s for AES-256 again per core.
>>
>> However, one should notice that Itanium has effectively three
>> independent pipelines with a tagged VLIW architecture, whereas Core 2
>> only has two untagged pipelines sharing the same execution scheduler.
>
> In other words, IA64 is a more sophisticated, capable
> architecture than IA32.
Oh - and the sun rises in the east.
|
| Show full article (0.88Kb) |
|
5 Comments |
|
|
Author: JSHJSH
Date: Jan 19, 2008 10:06
So the scenario that would occur if I factored an RSA number is most
likely I'd be killed, and then the information would just kind of
disappear as people worked to clean up the situation and most of you
would just go on about your lives.
And soon enough it'd all be forgotten.
That is why Usenet is important in this scenario to spread the
information widely enough that by the time certain unethical people
who don't give a damn about laws figure out what it is, just killing
me and cleaning up by suppression is not an option.
Given George W. Bush's current history of lack of love of the law, I
don't think I can really be challenged on my fear that this government
in the US is quite capable of breaking any law which could mean me
getting murdered for my great achievement of discovery.
So there will be no absolute demonstration by factoring of an RSA
public key though I dare any of you to do it, as then at least I
wouldn't die alone:
Given a nonzero target composite T and integer factors f_1 and f_2,
such that f_1*f_2 = nT, and any prime p, the following relations must
be true:
|
| Show full article (1.64Kb) |
|
10 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: A. M. G. SoloA. M. G. Solo
Date: Jan 18, 2008 22:58
CALL FOR PAPERS
and
Call For Workshop Proposals
WORLDCOMP'08
The 2008 World Congress in Computer Science,
Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing
July 14-17, 2008, Las Vegas, USA
(composed of 25 Joint Conferences)
ACADEMIC SPONSORS: Research labs at Harvard University, UCLA,
Georgia Institute of Technology, University of Texas at Austin,
University of Iowa, and others (see below).
You are invited to submit a paper (and/or a proposal to organize
a session/workshop). All accepted papers will be published in the
respective conference proceedings.
The 2008 World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering,
and Applied Computing (WORLDCOMP'08) is composed of the following
25 conferences (all will be held simultaneously, same location
and dates: July 14-17, 2008, USA):
|
| Show full article (12.32Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
