sci.crypt
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.crypt only
 
Advanced search
January 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 1
78910111213 2
14151617181920 3
21222324252627 4
28293031    5
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.crypt Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

 Up
  Re: JSH: State of the art with my factoring congruences         


Author: Uncle Al
Date: Jan 24, 2008 10:47

JSH wrote:
[snip crap]

It is trivially shown by mathematical induction that the number of
prime numbers is not only finite, it is small. All prime numbers are
generated by running n = 0-40 inclusive:

n^2 - n + 41

There is NO factorization problem! Mathematicians have erected a
complex, elaborate smokescreen to hide the truth! Presumed idiot JSH
was bought into the conspiracy to eructate an impossible to execute
mathematical "solution" to divert attention from the truth.

DON'T BE FOOLED! Trapdoor encryption is trivially unraveled BECAUSE
THERE ARE ONLY 41 PRIME NUMBERS!

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
1 Comment
  Re: JSH: State of the art with my factoring congruences         


Author: Duatcher
Date: Jan 24, 2008 08:43

(APE Newswire story #2938471 iffy moron crackpot infesting sci.physics
again)

"WEASEL WORDING" JSH SUPPORTS HIS "MONKEY MATH"

"JSH" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:94ca2e80-5713-4eea-95ee-ae8e92b6145b@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...

"....seems dedicated..... "

"....one of my key ideas seems to not be working....."

".....it does seem like........."

".......it should be possible........"

"How do you know which of the residues given by the factoring
congruences correspond to your target?"

"How do you know at each prime which factor is which?"

"........but for the second I'm thinking......"

" ........there may be........ "

"....those relations will be true 75%% of the time."

"........which may mean........"

"if so.......",

"If not then the multiple primes approach is toast."

"One correction as previously I thought......."
Show full article (1.30Kb)
3 Comments