On Jan 21, 9:14 pm, "an_old_fried" blogless.net>
wrote:

fake

Can someone explain to me how nothing matters at all with you people?

One of the simplest algebraic proofs in mathematical history solves
the factoring problem, and you have independent validation from
someone other than me, but still some of you misinterpret the results
and insult me, while the rest of you are quiet, as always.

I wondered for a while if some alien species had taken over the planet
and sought to end the future of the human race by keeping it from
getting its math right, but I've recently concluded that many of you
just have no clue what mathematics is.

To you it's a style, and agreement, and lots of results from the
"smart people" as determined by some vague rules who tell you what to
think.

And God help anyone you don't like, as you'll reject anything they
discover, which is like diamond merchants looking the prospector up
and down and rejecting a HUGE major diamond because they don't like
the guy.

The only conclusion available is that most of you do not do any real
mathematics.

legal according to Chinese
law, but illegal according to British law. Reference is made to
Chinese gentlemen; I believe that not one of them has his 'house'
in Hong Kong; the wife (small-footed) is kept at the family home
in China. Each of them has his harem only in Hong Kong. There may
be an exception to this rule, but I have never heard of any such
exception. (I know of only one, of a Chinese gentleman, who, for
certain reasons, was afraid to return to China.) ... I have not
known a single case of adoption by a Chinaman in Hong Kong. They
may exist in China proper, and possibly in Hong Kong ... They are
not in China proper a sacred religious obligation, except in
rare cases indeed, in which the conditions of clanship and other
stringent conditions are precisely complied with; and they have
as much to do with the necessities of the poor, and no more, than
would be the case in England or Ireland in the time of a famine.
These Chinese gentlemen say that the children are well cared for.
If girls eligible for marriage or concubinage, they are sold for
that, and form a profitable investment to a Chinese gentleman.
If not so eligible, they are sold for any, even the worst
purpose,--brothels, according to my experience in the Criminal ...

So I have a rather easy mathematical proof that I solved the factoring
problem, and I've presented all the mathematics to the world in
multiple ways.

But the fascinating thing is how useless that is with the modern
mathematical community and I see that as being a measure of its ill
health.

Like how certain posters interpreted spectacular results validating
the easy algebra presented as exactly the opposite.

Kind of reminding me when sci.math posters took publication of a paper
of mine as a negative, and then rationalized how publication didn't
matter as they excoriated the mathematical journal for publication.
And THEN some of them ripped on the math journal when the editors
caved after some sci.math'ers sent emails claiming errors in the paper
and the editors withdrew my paper after publication.

They want their cake and to eat it too.

Now my perspective on what the guys at the top of the heap in the
mathematical field do, is, I think, they look to see if the cows are
still herding well, and yes, you are the cows.

On Jan 20, 10:56 am, Enrico aol.com> wrote:

www.Man-X.org

Earth to earth Ashes to ashes dust to dust

Hello I will like you see this page And tell me what do you think
It´s FREE www.Man-X.org 3 live cams free!!

On Jan 20, 6:55 pm, JSH gmail.com> wrote:

At least you didn't do anything really stupid, like
send threatening, unsolicited messages to mathematicians
around the world, submit an incorrect paper to the Annals
of Mathematics, or demand a press release announcing your
results.

"mike3" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5a264ed5-9756-4d64-9247-5efea53dff2e@l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

Better yet, assign him to figure out why mathematicians are hiding the fact
that sqrt(4) can be negative too.

OR, that the distributive property doesn't work.

On Jan 20, 5:11 pm, mike3 yahoo.com> wrote:

I would even settle on him factoring a previously factored RSA number
and showing the steps or even code to do it - with his latest
guessowrk - I mean proof - I mean lame attempt - I mean - you get the
idea!

Then - he proves his algorithm and doesn't collpase world markets,
mating butterflies, migrating ants, rocket launches and rogue
asteroids and comets.

A good outcome for all!

John E. Hadstate wrote: